Topic: Transgender Identity and Experiences of Violence Victimization, Substance Use, Suicide Risk, and Sex
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #123,581
I just took a screenshot node of the information on the CDC website concerning transgender issues. This is viable information that is just being neglected because it doesn't fit the agenda of the current administration. Basically, the reason why I am posting this here is to save it for future generations to have accurate information, in other words, this right here:> CDC’s website is being modified to comply with President Trump’s Executive Orders.
I'm not sure if this information would be changed to fit a more conservative narrow viewpoint of the scientific data or not, but it's important to make sure the current information isn't lost.
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,345,894
wouldn't an outfit like the CDC have backups of their shit already for pete's sake
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,896
@previous (boof)Most likely but given how this smells like a book burning tactic, you can never have too many backups. I know there is the Internet Archive, but you know the federal government will likely try to take them down.
@previous (boof)
Here is another article.
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,897
good, good --it is a lesson to anyone who cares for data -- get that shit duplicated in anticipation of enemies of knowledge coming round
there should have been three more Libraries of Alexandria
there should have been three more Libraries of Alexandria
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 25 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,898
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 39 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,899
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 1 year ago, 52 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,900
@1,345,897 (boof)
There is so much information on the CDC website that it's fucking annoying that it's likely all just going to be tossed away.
There is so much information on the CDC website that it's fucking annoying that it's likely all just going to be tossed away.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,918
Shut the fuck up Catherine
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,936
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 28 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,941
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,943
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,948
Problem Solver joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 23 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,949
@previous (A)
Fund the CDC to create medications to turn Transsexuals into their sex at birth. Simple brain meds to correct the mental problem.
Fund the CDC to create medications to turn Transsexuals into their sex at birth. Simple brain meds to correct the mental problem.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 24 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,968
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 26 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,998
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,006
@1,345,949 (Problem Solver)
This is dangerous thinking, pal. The minute you do this then it's only going to open the door to "fixing" other problems like autism and down's syndrome.
At which point you have to ask the question as to why you're doing this? The neurotypical world is practically literally making you into a good little worker drone.
Do you want to create a new race of super humans?
That sounds like what you're trying to go for in the end game.
In which case, I will have to end you, eugenicist shitbag.
This is dangerous thinking, pal. The minute you do this then it's only going to open the door to "fixing" other problems like autism and down's syndrome.
At which point you have to ask the question as to why you're doing this? The neurotypical world is practically literally making you into a good little worker drone.
Do you want to create a new race of super humans?
That sounds like what you're trying to go for in the end game.
In which case, I will have to end you, eugenicist shitbag.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,007
@previous (A)
But you have no problem with "dangerous thinking". It can't only be bad when it's something you don't like. Having "bad ideas" is a natural part of the human experience
But you have no problem with "dangerous thinking". It can't only be bad when it's something you don't like. Having "bad ideas" is a natural part of the human experience
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 18 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,010
@1,346,006 (A)
> This is dangerous thinking, pal. The minute you do this then it's only going to open the door to "fixing" other problems like autism and down's syndrome.
>
> At which point you have to ask the question as to why you're doing this? The neurotypical world is practically literally making you into a good little worker drone.
>
> Do you want to create a new race of super humans?
>
> That sounds like what you're trying to go for in the end game.
>
> In which case, I will have to end you, eugenicist shitbag.
He didn't say anything even bad. If anything he is kinder than I am. I'd actually they rather find out what genes are causing it if that is the case and element it from the gene pool along with those other conditions you mentioned.
> This is dangerous thinking, pal. The minute you do this then it's only going to open the door to "fixing" other problems like autism and down's syndrome.
>
> At which point you have to ask the question as to why you're doing this? The neurotypical world is practically literally making you into a good little worker drone.
>
> Do you want to create a new race of super humans?
>
> That sounds like what you're trying to go for in the end game.
>
> In which case, I will have to end you, eugenicist shitbag.
He didn't say anything even bad. If anything he is kinder than I am. I'd actually they rather find out what genes are causing it if that is the case and element it from the gene pool along with those other conditions you mentioned.
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,012
@1,346,006 (A)
Down's syndrome is a genuine genetic fuck up. They have yet to find the cause of autism and of course will one day.
> Having "bad ideas" is a natural part of the human experience
So, one day someone like Catharine wakes up and says to self, I would rather be the other gender.
I have no doubt that one day Medical Science will find a drug to fix such a condition. In the meantime Catharine is free to try and trick people into thinking he is a she.
Down's syndrome is a genuine genetic fuck up. They have yet to find the cause of autism and of course will one day.
> Having "bad ideas" is a natural part of the human experience
So, one day someone like Catharine wakes up and says to self, I would rather be the other gender.
I have no doubt that one day Medical Science will find a drug to fix such a condition. In the meantime Catharine is free to try and trick people into thinking he is a she.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,014
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,017
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 26 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,027
@1,346,012 (G)
> Down's syndrome is a genuine genetic fuck up. They have yet to find the cause of autism and of course will one day.
> > Having "bad ideas" is a natural part of the human experience
>
> So, one day someone like Catharine wakes up and says to self, I would rather be the other gender.
> I have no doubt that one day Medical Science will find a drug to fix such a condition. In the meantime Catharine is free to try and trick people into thinking he is a she.
Down syndrome 100 percent should be eliminated from the gene pool along arguably anyone who thinks it should not.
> Down's syndrome is a genuine genetic fuck up. They have yet to find the cause of autism and of course will one day.
> > Having "bad ideas" is a natural part of the human experience
>
> So, one day someone like Catharine wakes up and says to self, I would rather be the other gender.
> I have no doubt that one day Medical Science will find a drug to fix such a condition. In the meantime Catharine is free to try and trick people into thinking he is a she.
Down syndrome 100 percent should be eliminated from the gene pool along arguably anyone who thinks it should not.
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,032
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 11 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,033
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,088
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You're a creep. You not her
I respect Catherine’s choice to live as a woman and I will always address her with she/her pronouns but Syntax is right, Catherine is a biological man and always will be.
> You're a creep. You not her
I respect Catherine’s choice to live as a woman and I will always address her with she/her pronouns but Syntax is right, Catherine is a biological man and always will be.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,090
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,111
Catherine if you are listening you will never be a real woman. And we won't ever let you forget that fact.Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,112
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,114
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,138
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,148
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,206
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,215
@1,346,017 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Why do you always have to treat her like that?
Catherine is rude and antagonistic to anyone in here who dares have a different opinion to him on the 'transgender' issue. You're only upset about it because it pleases you to see men make themselves ludicrous.
> Why do you always have to treat her like that?
Catherine is rude and antagonistic to anyone in here who dares have a different opinion to him on the 'transgender' issue. You're only upset about it because it pleases you to see men make themselves ludicrous.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,218
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,223
Anonymous L replied with this 1 year ago, 1 second later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,224
@1,346,218 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
And he's a cunt to those who don't so quit worrying about him and let him live his life. Do you think if you take your eye off him for half a minute he might stop mutilating himself for your amusement? Leave him out of your hatred of men.
And he's a cunt to those who don't so quit worrying about him and let him live his life. Do you think if you take your eye off him for half a minute he might stop mutilating himself for your amusement? Leave him out of your hatred of men.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,227
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 18 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,228
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,230
Catherine should kill HEr self.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,233
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,237
@1,346,090 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Why do you think she needs to hear that from you?
because she’s a hypocrite and an asshole who talks about herself in the third person and has a fake Cato persona she made up to garner sympathy
> Why do you think she needs to hear that from you?
because she’s a hypocrite and an asshole who talks about herself in the third person and has a fake Cato persona she made up to garner sympathy
Anonymous L replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,238
@1,346,228 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Why don't you quote worrying about what I'm doing
I'm not worrying about it. I'm advising you to drop the sanctimony. Syntax is unnecessarily rude to Catherine, it's true, but what you do is far worse. Pretending to have Catherine's best interests at heart when in fact he's just a part of your pathological loathing of men.
> Why don't you quote worrying about what I'm doing
I'm not worrying about it. I'm advising you to drop the sanctimony. Syntax is unnecessarily rude to Catherine, it's true, but what you do is far worse. Pretending to have Catherine's best interests at heart when in fact he's just a part of your pathological loathing of men.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,241
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 45 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,242
Nony replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,346,258
@1,346,218 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,346,218 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> She's fine to people who treat her respectfully
Karma. When he treats me and others with respect. Then and only then.
@1,346,218 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> She's fine to people who treat her respectfully
Karma. When he treats me and others with respect. Then and only then.