Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago#123,538
I hate that men don't want to admit this and often times point the finger at women being overly emotional. Yet men will dwell over a girl for months if not years whining about how they're going to be alone forever if they're not by their side. They always think with emotion and yet pass themselves off as being logical individuals. This is only true when they know how to be honest with themselves about what they're feeling and how to properly dwell with their emotions.
Women tend to be more logical because they know what is and isn't good for them, even if a man tells them otherwise. They just have problems with setting boundaries or feeling like a burden because men always impose the idea that they're not allowed to have personal boundaries.
Feminism isn't self-sustaining, the antinatalism will keep it a minority interest group.
Most women I've met have emotional outbursts and justify it, and couldn't name any elementary concepts in logic. What's the point in saying feminists are the rational ones when so many don't bother using that framework for the world anyway?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,345,576
Yes, the idea that men aren't emotional has always been hysterically funny to me. Men are just as emotional as women, and orders of magnitude more violent. Those emotions manifest in the assaults, beatings, rapes, and murders that are overwhelmingly committed by men.
Anonymous E double-posted this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,345,577
@1,345,535 (B)
Antinatalism is very much a minority position among feminists. Even among ecofeminists, arguably the most sympathetic to antinatalism, it's a miniscule number who subscribe to it.
> I’d argue that men are more emotional than women.
Quite possibly, but consider that determination, resolve, contentment, interest, gratitude, awe, hope, and love are also emotions.
"Emotional" doesn't mean "irrational". Emotions can appear for rational reasons, be shaped by rational thought processes, and lend themselves to perfectly rational conclusions/outcomes.
But I suspect biological sex plays a far lesser role than cultural and societal influences. Even though some things, nevertheless, appear to hold true regardless of cultural context, e.g. women typically cry more, men are considerably more physically violent, and women tend to be more empathetic (although, interestingly, not necessarily more forgiving).
> Antinatalism is very much a minority position among feminists.
The most pronatalist feminists will be vocal about how it's a choice and encourage delaying pregnancy. A lot of the modern rhetoric practically encourages lesbianism. There's no quiverfull movement in the feminists space because it's already self-selected for tokophobes.
> From what I've seen, men seem to think that nearly any feeling or act that they experience is rational
Compared to women, nearly everything men do is. If you don't know the difference between the two, and you think like the typical woman, it's nothing more than an empty word validating another's ideas. > Also, many males don't count anger/jealousy when they talk about whether men or women are more emotional
Almost all interacting between these two groups has feminists expressing anger rather than acting dialectical. "Jealousy" is a joke, women have a pattern of disloyalty that result in men taking calculated actions to detect cheating and react to avoid costs.