Topic: It looks like the CDC is erasing medical research concerning gender affirming care.
La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI started this discussion 1 year ago #123,501
I want to know if there is a way to obtain this information and preserve it somewhere safe, so we don't have to start all over again when this nightmare finally ends.
I know there is a bunch of third-party medical pages on the internet, and I know the Internet Archive likely captured some of these pages. Still, though, the American people are already uneducated enough concerning this subject... removing the actual research is likely going to make it impossible for people to learn.
Book burnings are about to become a thing again.
I know there is a bunch of third-party medical pages on the internet, and I know the Internet Archive likely captured some of these pages. Still, though, the American people are already uneducated enough concerning this subject... removing the actual research is likely going to make it impossible for people to learn.
Book burnings are about to become a thing again.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,345,125
It's fucking ridiculous. It's a fascist coup.
La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 24 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,128
@previous (B)
I’m concerned with preserving this knowledge so that we can keep it safe through the worst of times.
I’m concerned with preserving this knowledge so that we can keep it safe through the worst of times.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,129
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,130
"gender affirming care" is an oxymoron and also basically nonsense.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,131
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,132
La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 59 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,133
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 57 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,134
@previous (La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI)
> Kill yourself.
That's not very nice. I'm sorry you're wrong and so angry, but that's not my fault.
> Kill yourself.
That's not very nice. I'm sorry you're wrong and so angry, but that's not my fault.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,135
Catherine joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,141
This is all to demorallize transwomen so we'll agree to be sex slaves. This whole fucking election, was about cornering us so repressed Republicans can fuck us. Just fucking watch, the next thing they pass will be to make it legal for enslave transwomen.
La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,147
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 32 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,149
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,161
That's excellent news!
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,183
@1,345,130 (C)Same reason we don't keep track of other body mutilation clubs, they're on their own wavelength and not our problem.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,194
> CDC is erasing medical research concerning gender affirming care.
Male sperm (\(Y\)) contain a Y chromosome, while female sperm (\(X\)) contain an X chromosome.
The sex of a baby is determined by which chromosome the sperm contributes to the egg
Male sperm (\(Y\)) contain a Y chromosome, while female sperm (\(X\)) contain an X chromosome.
The sex of a baby is determined by which chromosome the sperm contributes to the egg
Meta joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 23 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,203
Wait why would the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention be researching sex changes? Is transgenderism a disease? Can it be prevented??
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,206
AI replied with this 1 year ago, 44 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,207
@1,345,203 (Meta)
Occasionally, the hormones that trigger the development of biological sex may not work properly on the brain, reproductive organs and genitals, causing differences between them. This may be caused by: additional hormones in the mother's system – possibly as a result of taking medication.
Out of AI mode. Clearly science can develop medications to put the brain back into normal working order.
Occasionally, the hormones that trigger the development of biological sex may not work properly on the brain, reproductive organs and genitals, causing differences between them. This may be caused by: additional hormones in the mother's system – possibly as a result of taking medication.
Out of AI mode. Clearly science can develop medications to put the brain back into normal working order.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 37 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,208
Meta double-posted this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,211
I mean it just seems weird for the CDC to be researching this sort of thing because it’s not even in the DSM anymore for years now and I don’t think many people would consider it a disease the CDC should research.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,214
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,272
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 30 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,276
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 35 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,280
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,281
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,283
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,447
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,522
The Nazi party in Germany raided and burned books from the Institute of Sexual Science, which contained research on gay and transgender topics. Not sure why I typed that because what's happening today in the US is completely different and any parallels between our situation and Nazi Germany's is liberal hysteria. This is all totally normal and okay.La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,526
@previous (L)
I sometimes wonder if any of the destroyed research then and again when the U.S. first attempted this was different from what we knew.
I have a feeling that it was mostly the same, but I’m just wondering if something else was known that we’ve yet to re-discover.
I sometimes wonder if any of the destroyed research then and again when the U.S. first attempted this was different from what we knew.
I have a feeling that it was mostly the same, but I’m just wondering if something else was known that we’ve yet to re-discover.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,527
@1,345,522 (L)Yeah. It's a shame the CDC website was, like, the only place you could learn about sex changes.
Also here's an actual Roman salute - you can see it's not even the same thing.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 49 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,538
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,540
@1,345,527 (Meta)
I learned about sex changes on a geocities webpage with spinning gifs and photos of licenses to be transsexual from Pre-Nazi Germany. And then I found minichan.org!
I learned about sex changes on a geocities webpage with spinning gifs and photos of licenses to be transsexual from Pre-Nazi Germany. And then I found minichan.org!
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,543
@1,345,538 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
All the angles are wrong. Also if Elon is openly Nazi why didn’t he do a proper Sieg heil!? Why didn’t he say anything about Jews? What kind of “Nazi” buddies up with Benjamin Netanyahu, does an apology/groveling tour at Auschwitz, and advocates for more H1B Indian indentured servants? This isn’t anything like National Socialism.
All the angles are wrong. Also if Elon is openly Nazi why didn’t he do a proper Sieg heil!? Why didn’t he say anything about Jews? What kind of “Nazi” buddies up with Benjamin Netanyahu, does an apology/groveling tour at Auschwitz, and advocates for more H1B Indian indentured servants? This isn’t anything like National Socialism.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,544
@previous (Meta)
I saw the video from multiple angles and it looked like a Nazi salute
I think he thought he was being funny and edgy
I saw the video from multiple angles and it looked like a Nazi salute
I think he thought he was being funny and edgy
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,545
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It absolutely was. His beliefs, his past, his actions, and the fact that he did it twice makes it obvious.
It absolutely was. His beliefs, his past, his actions, and the fact that he did it twice makes it obvious.
Anonymous L replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,549
@1,345,543 (Meta)
I don't think Nazis were busting out protractors to ensure all the angles were exact. What an absurd rebuttal. As for the Jew remark, you're focusing on a specific detail as a way to ignore the overarching similarities. You may as well say, well this isn't the 1930s so therefore there can be no overlap in their beliefs or actions. The fascist playbook always calls for an out-group to be demonized. For the nazis that was the Jews. That doesn't mean it always has to be Jews.
I don't think Nazis were busting out protractors to ensure all the angles were exact. What an absurd rebuttal. As for the Jew remark, you're focusing on a specific detail as a way to ignore the overarching similarities. You may as well say, well this isn't the 1930s so therefore there can be no overlap in their beliefs or actions. The fascist playbook always calls for an out-group to be demonized. For the nazis that was the Jews. That doesn't mean it always has to be Jews.
Martthew Milsden replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,570
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,589
La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 30 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,592
@1,345,570 (Martthew Milsden)
I love how you’re still retarded enough to point fingers at the same god damn party.
I love how you’re still retarded enough to point fingers at the same god damn party.
Meta replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,659
@1,345,549 (L)
No I am asking for the overlap (not gestures or salutes or whatever but the actual speech ideology) in Elon’s speeches and speeches that would have been given by NSDAP leaders in the ‘30s to mid ‘40s because I am genuinely not seeing much overlap between Elon and the NSDAP in terms of worldview or policies or goals.
No I am asking for the overlap (not gestures or salutes or whatever but the actual speech ideology) in Elon’s speeches and speeches that would have been given by NSDAP leaders in the ‘30s to mid ‘40s because I am genuinely not seeing much overlap between Elon and the NSDAP in terms of worldview or policies or goals.
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Meta double-posted this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,661
@1,345,549 (L)
Here’s some actual NSDAP propaganda so you can see what I mean: https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/ww2era.htm
Here’s some actual NSDAP propaganda so you can see what I mean: https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/ww2era.htm
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,662
@1,345,549 (L)
> The fascist playbook always calls for an out-group to be demonized. For the nazis that was the Jews. That doesn't mean it always has to be Jews.
What about demonising people who voted for Trump and trying to make "MAGA" an out-group? Would people who do that qualify as fascist/neo-Nazi?
> The fascist playbook always calls for an out-group to be demonized. For the nazis that was the Jews. That doesn't mean it always has to be Jews.
What about demonising people who voted for Trump and trying to make "MAGA" an out-group? Would people who do that qualify as fascist/neo-Nazi?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,664
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,666
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You're right, MAGA is a choice people are free to make in a democratic country. Is demonising them for this choice something fascists would do?
You're right, MAGA is a choice people are free to make in a democratic country. Is demonising them for this choice something fascists would do?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,668
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,669
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
1. You dodged the question.
2. That being the case, the liberals are now mimicking them.
1. You dodged the question.
2. That being the case, the liberals are now mimicking them.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,670
@previous (N)
I think that seeing conservatives demonize people for how they are born for such a long time, makes me care far less about demonizing people for who they vote for
It isn't automatically fascist to demonize someone for their actions
Hope that helps
I think that seeing conservatives demonize people for how they are born for such a long time, makes me care far less about demonizing people for who they vote for
It isn't automatically fascist to demonize someone for their actions
Hope that helps
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,673
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I think that seeing conservatives demonize people for how they are born for such a long time, makes me care far less about demonizing people for who they vote for
So you're fine with hatred and intolerance provided you agree with it. Got it.
> I think that seeing conservatives demonize people for how they are born for such a long time, makes me care far less about demonizing people for who they vote for
So you're fine with hatred and intolerance provided you agree with it. Got it.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,675
La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,681
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,683
@previous (La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI)
> You’re kind of a pussy, bro. Yet you identify as ‘male.’
Where have I "identified" as anything?
> You’re kind of a pussy, bro. Yet you identify as ‘male.’
Where have I "identified" as anything?
Anonymous N double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,684
@1,345,675 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I can definitely hate someones choices. Absolutely
Hating someone's choices is not the same as hating the person and demonising them for those choices. Hate the sin, love the sinner etc.
> I can definitely hate someones choices. Absolutely
Hating someone's choices is not the same as hating the person and demonising them for those choices. Hate the sin, love the sinner etc.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,686
La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,688
@1,345,683 (N)
Your gender likely aligns with your biological sex. So, by default, you identify as something. You’re most likely identifying as ‘male,’ but I fail to see any evidence for that since you whine like a little bitch.
Your gender likely aligns with your biological sex. So, by default, you identify as something. You’re most likely identifying as ‘male,’ but I fail to see any evidence for that since you whine like a little bitch.
Anonymous M replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,691
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 34 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,692
@1,345,688 (La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI)
> You’re most likely identifying as ‘male,’ but I fail to see any evidence for that
You're a bit of a retard aren't you?
> You’re most likely identifying as ‘male,’ but I fail to see any evidence for that
You're a bit of a retard aren't you?
Anonymous N double-posted this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,695
@1,345,686 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Explain how they differ in functionality
I hate that my sister smokes. I hate the choice she makes to smoke. When I speak to her about it, I use love, compassion and understanding, because people on the whole don't change their life choices or ideology by being called names and demonised. No homophobe or racist ever stopped being homophobic or racist because of an insult.
> Explain how they differ in functionality
I hate that my sister smokes. I hate the choice she makes to smoke. When I speak to her about it, I use love, compassion and understanding, because people on the whole don't change their life choices or ideology by being called names and demonised. No homophobe or racist ever stopped being homophobic or racist because of an insult.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,698
@previous (N)
Do you try and pass laws to keep her from smoking?
Do you teach small children that your sister will go to hell for smoking?
I really don't care when racists and homophones get insulted, to be frank
Do you try and pass laws to keep her from smoking?
Do you teach small children that your sister will go to hell for smoking?
I really don't care when racists and homophones get insulted, to be frank
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 31 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,699
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,705
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,706
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,708
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,711
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,713
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,716
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,719
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,721
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,724
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 19 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,725
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,726
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You like her just the way she is. And that is a beautiful thing
Interesting logic. If you liked a child cancer patient just the way they were, would that be "a beautiful thing"?
> You like her just the way she is. And that is a beautiful thing
Interesting logic. If you liked a child cancer patient just the way they were, would that be "a beautiful thing"?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,729
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,730
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Yes
So it's a "beautiful thing" that you wouldn't want to change the fact they have cancer. Ok then.
> Yes
So it's a "beautiful thing" that you wouldn't want to change the fact they have cancer. Ok then.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,733
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 36 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,734
@1,345,729 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Look, I quickly grow bored of dumb people so I'm going to leave you with this: you have a hatred of men and it pleases you to see troubled males hack themselves up and "become girls". You do not care about Catherine's well-being. You have spent years exploiting and encouraging Catherine's confusion and self-loathing. You can "what a dumb comment" this all you like but it won't change its truth.
Ok, I'm done with you.
Look, I quickly grow bored of dumb people so I'm going to leave you with this: you have a hatred of men and it pleases you to see troubled males hack themselves up and "become girls". You do not care about Catherine's well-being. You have spent years exploiting and encouraging Catherine's confusion and self-loathing. You can "what a dumb comment" this all you like but it won't change its truth.
Ok, I'm done with you.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 41 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,736
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,798
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
They're probably a nonce
They're probably a nonce
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,805
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Is the cancer not attached to them?
Is the cancer not attached to them?
Anonymous O replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,809
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
> Kook has always been a nonce.
Who's a bigger one him or you?
> Kook has always been a nonce.
Who's a bigger one him or you?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,816
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Attached to them as well
Attached to them as well
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,345,880
@1,345,692 (N)
> You're a bit of a retard aren't you?
A bit of a retard? *complete.
@1,345,698 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I really don't care when racists and homophones get insulted
You know that a homophone is a word that sounds the same as another word, right? E.g. hair and hare.
@1,345,699 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Do you think she'll become smarter if you insult her?
*he'll... *him
> You're a bit of a retard aren't you?
A bit of a retard? *complete.
@1,345,698 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I really don't care when racists and homophones get insulted
You know that a homophone is a word that sounds the same as another word, right? E.g. hair and hare.
@1,345,699 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Do you think she'll become smarter if you insult her?
*he'll... *him