Minichan

Topic: Remember when lab leak theory was called a dangerous conspiracy theory, and facebook banned the idea

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #123,239

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/25/us/politics/cia-covid-lab-leak.html

Now it's the favored explanation from the CIA.

This won't be a learning experience for any censors, they'll just insist it's different next time they try to ban people from talking about an idea.

boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later[^] [v] #1,343,307

dipshit, the lab idea has always been speculative, and remains uncertain, among other possible scenarios. that idea alone was never dismissed as crackpot conspiracy mongering. it was the pile of other bullshit put on top of that idea that was so fucking retarded and deserving of "fuck off". There were speculations upon that speculation that did not help anyone's understanding. But you know that. You just post shit out of boredom and lack of imagination of something new.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 7 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,335

All that does is help make Covid a thing. It was never a thing, it was a cold. The rest was a psyop.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 6 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,396

@previous (C)
Harvard Medical School, I presume?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,406

@1,343,307 (boof)

Yes, it's speculative, and how are we supposed to speculate and figure out new things when those ideas are banned from the start?

The point of allowing these ideas isn't that they are proven, it's to create a discussion about these ideas and let people figure it out.

If we ban ideas that aren't proven yet, why even have comments? Might as well ban comments altogether to stop any speculation, and only allow state-approved authors to write anything.

The fact that they banned an idea that is now the leading theory should prove how flawed this type of censorship is.

(Edited 17 seconds later.)

boof replied with this 1 year ago, 29 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,419

@previous (E)
they weren't "banned from the start" so fuck you

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,421

I remember that when people were saying ban people from China entering, people went crazy making racism accusations.

boof replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,422

@previous (F)
yeah Chinese-looking people were getting harassed in public. it was fucking stupid.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,557

@previous (boof)

I mean more that when DT said we should stop people coming from China, redditors were going ape shit.

boof replied with this 1 year ago, 52 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,582

@previous (F)
ape shit you say

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,583

@OP
The lab leak theory has always been the official story since day 1, just as the humble Jew has always stood proud in our great nation

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,708

@1,343,419 (boof)
Yes they were. You didn't need to have any crazy add-ons, any post suggesting it was a lab leak would get censored.

Meta joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,710

@1,343,557 (F)
You mean one of the strategies he tried to contain the Chinese virus pouring out of China... was quarantining China?

What a horrible racist!

boof replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,720

@1,343,708 (E)
oh? was this following the rash of serious bullshit from the troll farms? was this lazy automated moderating the response?

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 47 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,721

@previous (boof)

> oh? was this following the rash of serious bullshit from the troll farms? was this lazy automated moderating the response?

Zuckerberg married a Chinese woman, you do the math

boof replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,343,723

@previous (E)
I hear the Chinese kids are really good at it
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.