Topic: How bad can it get before something happens?
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #122,447
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 24 seconds later[^] [v] #1,336,501
The last time homelessness hit a record high was just before the last global financial crisis.(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 1 year ago, 32 seconds later, 56 seconds after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,502
Even office space isn't being used.Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,516
Things are happening, immense human suffering. This can probably happen a lot more before something happens because humans are flawed
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,517
Just move somewhere cheaper and easier to live in like everyone else has ever done for the entire existence of the species
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,518
my junkie pod invention would come in really handy now, just sayin
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,531
@1,336,517 (C)
These are national figures, so people should leave the country and set themselves up in an entirely different culture? That is very expensive, moving everything to a new country costs thousands of dollars in shipping fees and bureaucratic fees.
The homeless figure is at a record high because this is not how it has always been done. The recent numbers are outliers compared to the rest of the data.
These are national figures, so people should leave the country and set themselves up in an entirely different culture? That is very expensive, moving everything to a new country costs thousands of dollars in shipping fees and bureaucratic fees.
The homeless figure is at a record high because this is not how it has always been done. The recent numbers are outliers compared to the rest of the data.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 25 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,536
@previous (A)
That's a national mean average, there are places in America where it's very cheap to live and places where it's very expensive to live.
> That is very expensive
Just walk out your door and go to a new place. If you aren't prepared to do that, your situation can't be so bad.
That's a national mean average, there are places in America where it's very cheap to live and places where it's very expensive to live.
> That is very expensive
Just walk out your door and go to a new place. If you aren't prepared to do that, your situation can't be so bad.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,539
Luigi
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 44 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,543
@1,336,536 (C)
> That's a national mean average, there are places in America where it's very cheap to live and places where it's very expensive to live.
Both places are more expensive, and the number of homeless increases in tandem with those rising prices.
> Just walk out your door and go to a new place. If you aren't prepared to do that, your situation can't be so bad.
Cheaper areas still require paystubs from a local employer, and you can't walk your furniture to the affordable rural town.
Why do you think homeless numbers are up?
> That's a national mean average, there are places in America where it's very cheap to live and places where it's very expensive to live.
Both places are more expensive, and the number of homeless increases in tandem with those rising prices.
> Just walk out your door and go to a new place. If you aren't prepared to do that, your situation can't be so bad.
Cheaper areas still require paystubs from a local employer, and you can't walk your furniture to the affordable rural town.
Why do you think homeless numbers are up?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 30 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,548
lol what are homeless people going to do about it?
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,553
@1,336,543 (A)
There are more than 2 places in the USA
Abandon your furniture, start over again. You can get a job somewhere else easily before you even leave.
Homeless people are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate elsewhere. Most of them choose to be in the street, by behaving so disgustingly that they're banned from all the local help centers. Some think they're being countercultural. Most are just goddamn druggies.
There are more than 2 places in the USA
Abandon your furniture, start over again. You can get a job somewhere else easily before you even leave.
Homeless people are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate elsewhere. Most of them choose to be in the street, by behaving so disgustingly that they're banned from all the local help centers. Some think they're being countercultural. Most are just goddamn druggies.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,578
@previous (C)
Why are there more people that are strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort when the cost of housing goes up?
Why are there more people that are strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort when the cost of housing goes up?
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,606
@previous (A)
Because they are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate towards somewhere else to live and work.
Because they are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate towards somewhere else to live and work.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,748
@previous (C)
They are are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate towards somewhere else to live and work because are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate towards somewhere else to live and work? Quod semper est
They are are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate towards somewhere else to live and work because are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate towards somewhere else to live and work? Quod semper est
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,813
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,820
@previous (C)
I asked "Why are there more people that are strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort when the cost of housing goes up?"
I asked "Why are there more people that are strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort when the cost of housing goes up?"
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,821
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,823
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 45 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,824
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,826
@previous (C)
> Homeless people are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate elsewhere
> why?
> Because they are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate towards somewhere else to live and work.
> ???
> it's not circular reasoning.
> Homeless people are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate elsewhere
> why?
> Because they are too strung out, stupid, lazy or unwilling to make the effort to migrate towards somewhere else to live and work.
> ???
> it's not circular reasoning.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,839
@previous (A)
Think about it for a second, and maybe you'll understand? And once again, that's not what you asked.
Think about it for a second, and maybe you'll understand? And once again, that's not what you asked.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)