Topic: 54 yr. old kidnaps an 18 year old waffle house waitress, takes her to a motel, rapes her
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #12,237
After he falls asleep, she takes his pistol and kills him.
http://www.wsmv.com/story/15530101/police-gallatin-man-kidnapped-mt-juliet-woman-took-her-to-miss
http://www.wsmv.com/story/15530101/police-gallatin-man-kidnapped-mt-juliet-woman-took-her-to-miss
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #220,506
Well... He died doing what he loved.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #220,527
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #220,528
Fats !lbanned8o6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #220,529
Damn. I'm surprised this story isn't based out of Florida.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #220,534
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #220,552
@previous (C)
Okay, so he died after doing what he loved. Or maybe he loved kidnapping, cause technically he still had her kidnapped while he fell asleep. He just didn't have her restrained is all. Maybe he died while making a mistake, which actually happens pretty frequently, so really nothing too sensational happened.
Okay, so he died after doing what he loved. Or maybe he loved kidnapping, cause technically he still had her kidnapped while he fell asleep. He just didn't have her restrained is all. Maybe he died while making a mistake, which actually happens pretty frequently, so really nothing too sensational happened.
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #220,562
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 11 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,768
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
@220,529 (Fats !lbanned8o6)
Wasn't Florida host to the people who killed a boy and then put him in paint cans because they never watched Dexter and didn't know to put him in weighted bin bags and dump him in the swamp?
@220,529 (Fats !lbanned8o6)
Wasn't Florida host to the people who killed a boy and then put him in paint cans because they never watched Dexter and didn't know to put him in weighted bin bags and dump him in the swamp?
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 56 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,780
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,781
Why is Southeast USA such an utter shithole?
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,791
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,792
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
It can't just be the White people. White people have no problem being civilized here. I suspect it may be a combination of humidity, heat and the Baptist church.
It can't just be the White people. White people have no problem being civilized here. I suspect it may be a combination of humidity, heat and the Baptist church.
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,793
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,807
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,826
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,830
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
He is calling you a Jew and suggesting that you are a faggot for looking down at white people. He is suggesting that the "white trash" are superior to you, and you should kill yourself for feeling better than them. He is suggesting that a Jew like you could never be superior to a white man.
He is calling you a Jew and suggesting that you are a faggot for looking down at white people. He is suggesting that the "white trash" are superior to you, and you should kill yourself for feeling better than them. He is suggesting that a Jew like you could never be superior to a white man.
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,836
@previous (C)
> He is calling you a Jew and suggesting that you are a faggot for looking down at white people. He is suggesting that the "white trash" are superior to you, and you should kill yourself for feeling better than them. He is suggesting that a Jew like you could never be superior to a white man.
I'm not Jewish and not white trash. I am white. Very white. Pale white one could say. I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
> He is calling you a Jew and suggesting that you are a faggot for looking down at white people. He is suggesting that the "white trash" are superior to you, and you should kill yourself for feeling better than them. He is suggesting that a Jew like you could never be superior to a white man.
I'm not Jewish and not white trash. I am white. Very white. Pale white one could say. I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,850
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
I assume that this means you have no problem with my hatred of niggers from living in a state infested with them because if you didn't, then you'd be a hypocritical cretin that should kill himself.
> the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
I assume that this means you have no problem with my hatred of niggers from living in a state infested with them because if you didn't, then you'd be a hypocritical cretin that should kill himself.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,854
@220,836 (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
I never said you was Jewish. That suspicion is very Jewish of you, though.
I never said you was Jewish. That suspicion is very Jewish of you, though.
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,868
@220,850 (A)
The black people you are speaking of are in the minority and therefore are not the biggest part of the problem. While you may live in a lower class area where there is a higher concentration it does not change the fact that in areas where there are problems it can almost always be traced to white trash. If anything your hatred of blacks is hypocritical.
The black people you are speaking of are in the minority and therefore are not the biggest part of the problem. While you may live in a lower class area where there is a higher concentration it does not change the fact that in areas where there are problems it can almost always be traced to white trash. If anything your hatred of blacks is hypocritical.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,875
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> The black people you are speaking of are in the minority and therefore are not the biggest part of the problem.
Most blacks in this region are nigger trash, as most of the GOOD black people fled/are fleeing the city.
> While you may live in a lower class area where there is a higher concentration
I live near an area where there is a high concentration of black trash (aka: niggers) as I live 10 miles east of Detroit.
> it does not change the fact that in areas where there are problems it can almost always be traced to white trash.
The problems of white trash can almost always be traced back to baptist Christianity or poverty.
> If anything your hatred of blacks is hypocritical.
Where, in that post, did I say that I hated black people? Nowhere. I used the term nigger (meaning low-class black trash), not the term black people (meaning all black people).
> The black people you are speaking of are in the minority and therefore are not the biggest part of the problem.
Most blacks in this region are nigger trash, as most of the GOOD black people fled/are fleeing the city.
> While you may live in a lower class area where there is a higher concentration
I live near an area where there is a high concentration of black trash (aka: niggers) as I live 10 miles east of Detroit.
> it does not change the fact that in areas where there are problems it can almost always be traced to white trash.
The problems of white trash can almost always be traced back to baptist Christianity or poverty.
> If anything your hatred of blacks is hypocritical.
Where, in that post, did I say that I hated black people? Nowhere. I used the term nigger (meaning low-class black trash), not the term black people (meaning all black people).
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,877
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,883
@220,875 (A)
> >The black people you are speaking of are in the minority and therefore are not the biggest part of the problem.
> Most blacks in this region are nigger trash, as most of the GOOD black people fled/are fleeing the city.
Nigger trash. Hate speech
> >While you may live in a lower class area where there is a higher concentration
> I live near an area where there is a high concentration of black trash (aka: niggers) as I live 10 miles east of Detroit.
Aka: niggers. Hate speech
> >it does not change the fact that in areas where there are problems it can almost always be traced to white trash.
> The problems of white trash can almost always be traced back to baptist Christianity or poverty.
Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
> >If anything your hatred of blacks is hypocritical.
> Where, in that post, did I say that I hated black people? Nowhere. I used the term nigger (meaning low-class black trash), not the term black people (meaning all black people).
Nigger. Hate speech
I think we have both proven my point. Unless you would like to keep posting and prove it some more.
> >The black people you are speaking of are in the minority and therefore are not the biggest part of the problem.
> Most blacks in this region are nigger trash, as most of the GOOD black people fled/are fleeing the city.
Nigger trash. Hate speech
> >While you may live in a lower class area where there is a higher concentration
> I live near an area where there is a high concentration of black trash (aka: niggers) as I live 10 miles east of Detroit.
Aka: niggers. Hate speech
> >it does not change the fact that in areas where there are problems it can almost always be traced to white trash.
> The problems of white trash can almost always be traced back to baptist Christianity or poverty.
Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
> >If anything your hatred of blacks is hypocritical.
> Where, in that post, did I say that I hated black people? Nowhere. I used the term nigger (meaning low-class black trash), not the term black people (meaning all black people).
Nigger. Hate speech
I think we have both proven my point. Unless you would like to keep posting and prove it some more.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,892
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> Nigger. Hate speech
Let's see about YOUR "hate speech"...
@220,836 (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
Redneck. Hate speech.
> Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
Christianity: a religion forced upon the Northern Europeans by Eurasian invaders. The religion was founded by a Jew (Paul) and spread by the southern Europeans. Exactly how is this religion the fault of the white man, when it is clearly the fault of the brown man?
> I think we have both proven my point.
What point would that be? That I am somehow a hypocrite for hating black trash and you're somehow not a hypocrite for hating white trash?
> Nigger. Hate speech
Let's see about YOUR "hate speech"...
@220,836 (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
Redneck. Hate speech.
> Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
Christianity: a religion forced upon the Northern Europeans by Eurasian invaders. The religion was founded by a Jew (Paul) and spread by the southern Europeans. Exactly how is this religion the fault of the white man, when it is clearly the fault of the brown man?
> I think we have both proven my point.
What point would that be? That I am somehow a hypocrite for hating black trash and you're somehow not a hypocrite for hating white trash?
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,896
@previous (A)
> >Nigger. Hate speech
> Let's see about YOUR "hate speech"...
>
> > I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
> Redneck. Hate speech.
Redneck is not recognized as a racial slur, if anything it's a term of endearment.
> >Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
> Christianity: a religion forced upon the Northern Europeans by Eurasian invaders. The religion was founded by a Jew (Paul) and spread by the southern Europeans. Exactly how is this religion the fault of the white man, when it is clearly the fault of the brown man?
The white man embraced Christianity and allowed its barbarity to flourish when he brought it to the New World.
> >I think we have both proven my point.
> What point would that be? That I am somehow a hypocrite for hating black trash and you're somehow not a hypocrite for hating white trash?
Within those questions you have found the answer to your questions.
> >Nigger. Hate speech
> Let's see about YOUR "hate speech"...
>
> > I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
> Redneck. Hate speech.
Redneck is not recognized as a racial slur, if anything it's a term of endearment.
> >Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
> Christianity: a religion forced upon the Northern Europeans by Eurasian invaders. The religion was founded by a Jew (Paul) and spread by the southern Europeans. Exactly how is this religion the fault of the white man, when it is clearly the fault of the brown man?
The white man embraced Christianity and allowed its barbarity to flourish when he brought it to the New World.
> >I think we have both proven my point.
> What point would that be? That I am somehow a hypocrite for hating black trash and you're somehow not a hypocrite for hating white trash?
Within those questions you have found the answer to your questions.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,903
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> > >Nigger. Hate speech
> > Let's see about YOUR "hate speech"...
> >
> > > I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
> > Redneck. Hate speech.
> Redneck is not recognized as a racial slur
Oh, okay.
> if anything it's a term of endearment.
Nigger is a term of endearment... unless the user of the word is white.
> > >Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
> > Christianity: a religion forced upon the Northern Europeans by Eurasian invaders. The religion was founded by a Jew (Paul) and spread by the southern Europeans. Exactly how is this religion the fault of the white man, when it is clearly the fault of the brown man?
> The white man embraced Christianity and allowed its barbarity to flourish when he brought it to the New World.
The Eurasians of the decadent Roman empire converted the Northern European (white) pagans by the sword (meaning against their will), meaning they were forced to bow to the monotheistic Semitic god יהוה and his bastard son Jesus Christ. To claim that they allowed Christianity to flourish is like saying a rape victim and their descendents allowed AIDS to flourish.
> > >I think we have both proven my point.
> > What point would that be? That I am somehow a hypocrite for hating black trash and you're somehow not a hypocrite for hating white trash?
> Within those questions you have found the answer to your questions.
I don't think you're a hypocrite for hating white trash; I think you're a hypocrite for finding problems with my hatred of black trash.
> > >Nigger. Hate speech
> > Let's see about YOUR "hate speech"...
> >
> > > I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
> > Redneck. Hate speech.
> Redneck is not recognized as a racial slur
Oh, okay.
> if anything it's a term of endearment.
Nigger is a term of endearment... unless the user of the word is white.
> > >Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
> > Christianity: a religion forced upon the Northern Europeans by Eurasian invaders. The religion was founded by a Jew (Paul) and spread by the southern Europeans. Exactly how is this religion the fault of the white man, when it is clearly the fault of the brown man?
> The white man embraced Christianity and allowed its barbarity to flourish when he brought it to the New World.
The Eurasians of the decadent Roman empire converted the Northern European (white) pagans by the sword (meaning against their will), meaning they were forced to bow to the monotheistic Semitic god יהוה and his bastard son Jesus Christ. To claim that they allowed Christianity to flourish is like saying a rape victim and their descendents allowed AIDS to flourish.
> > >I think we have both proven my point.
> > What point would that be? That I am somehow a hypocrite for hating black trash and you're somehow not a hypocrite for hating white trash?
> Within those questions you have found the answer to your questions.
I don't think you're a hypocrite for hating white trash; I think you're a hypocrite for finding problems with my hatred of black trash.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,908
@previous (A)
Clearly, white people are inferior to Eurasians then. You're just mad because white people will always be at most the 2nd or 3rd best ethnicity.
Clearly, white people are inferior to Eurasians then. You're just mad because white people will always be at most the 2nd or 3rd best ethnicity.
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,910
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 9 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,911
It's only racist if you hate people from another race, if you hare your own race then it's just being bitter.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,914
@220,908 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
They may have had superior technology due to a higher supply of resources, but that does NOT mean that they are somehow "superior". REMEMBER: the Latin language has died, while Nordic languages like Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, Faroese and Icelandic flourish.
They may have had superior technology due to a higher supply of resources, but that does NOT mean that they are somehow "superior". REMEMBER: the Latin language has died, while Nordic languages like Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, Faroese and Icelandic flourish.
!VoCaLoNunI joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,915
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,916
@220,903 (A)
> > > >Nigger. Hate speech
> > > Let's see about YOUR "hate speech"...
> > >
> > > > I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
> > > Redneck. Hate speech.
> > Redneck is not recognized as a racial slur
> Oh, okay.
> >if anything it's a term of endearment.
> Nigger is a term of endearment... unless the user of the word is white.
The only reason a white person would use that term is racism.
> > > >Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
> > > Christianity: a religion forced upon the Northern Europeans by Eurasian invaders. The religion was founded by a Jew (Paul) and spread by the southern Europeans. Exactly how is this religion the fault of the white man, when it is clearly the fault of the brown man?
> > The white man embraced Christianity and allowed its barbarity to flourish when he brought it to the New World.
> The Eurasians of the decadent Roman empire converted the Northern European (white) pagans by the sword (meaning against their will), meaning they were forced to bow to the monotheistic Semitic god יהוה and his bastard son Jesus Christ. To claim that they allowed Christianity to flourish is like saying a rape victim and their descendents allowed AIDS to flourish.
And when the Roman Empire was conquered by white barbarians what was the reason for staying Christian?
> > > >I think we have both proven my point.
> > > What point would that be? That I am somehow a hypocrite for hating black trash and you're somehow not a hypocrite for hating white trash?
> > Within those questions you have found the answer to your questions.
> I don't think you're a hypocrite for hating white trash; I think you're a hypocrite for finding problems with my hatred of black trash.
Your problem is that you don't know when you have lost and you insist on responding. But please do carry on and continue to prove me right.
> > > >Nigger. Hate speech
> > > Let's see about YOUR "hate speech"...
> > >
> > > > I dislike just about every race but the rednecks are the worst ones because I live in a state infested with them.
> > > Redneck. Hate speech.
> > Redneck is not recognized as a racial slur
> Oh, okay.
> >if anything it's a term of endearment.
> Nigger is a term of endearment... unless the user of the word is white.
The only reason a white person would use that term is racism.
> > > >Christianity and poverty, brought to this continent by white men.
> > > Christianity: a religion forced upon the Northern Europeans by Eurasian invaders. The religion was founded by a Jew (Paul) and spread by the southern Europeans. Exactly how is this religion the fault of the white man, when it is clearly the fault of the brown man?
> > The white man embraced Christianity and allowed its barbarity to flourish when he brought it to the New World.
> The Eurasians of the decadent Roman empire converted the Northern European (white) pagans by the sword (meaning against their will), meaning they were forced to bow to the monotheistic Semitic god יהוה and his bastard son Jesus Christ. To claim that they allowed Christianity to flourish is like saying a rape victim and their descendents allowed AIDS to flourish.
And when the Roman Empire was conquered by white barbarians what was the reason for staying Christian?
> > > >I think we have both proven my point.
> > > What point would that be? That I am somehow a hypocrite for hating black trash and you're somehow not a hypocrite for hating white trash?
> > Within those questions you have found the answer to your questions.
> I don't think you're a hypocrite for hating white trash; I think you're a hypocrite for finding problems with my hatred of black trash.
Your problem is that you don't know when you have lost and you insist on responding. But please do carry on and continue to prove me right.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,920
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> The only reason a white person would use that term is racism.
Now that is racist.
> And when the Roman Empire was conquered by white barbarians what was the reason for staying Christian?
The reason for staying with/converting to Christianity was to avoid being killed for being a heathen. Christianity is funny that way.
> Your problem is that you don't know when you have lost and you insist on responding. But please do carry on and continue to prove me right.
Cease your smugness and admit that you were wrong. Or just keep on chanting that you are right and that I am a hypocrite for disliking a race that I like rather than disliking the race you dislike.
> The only reason a white person would use that term is racism.
Now that is racist.
> And when the Roman Empire was conquered by white barbarians what was the reason for staying Christian?
The reason for staying with/converting to Christianity was to avoid being killed for being a heathen. Christianity is funny that way.
> Your problem is that you don't know when you have lost and you insist on responding. But please do carry on and continue to prove me right.
Cease your smugness and admit that you were wrong. Or just keep on chanting that you are right and that I am a hypocrite for disliking a race that I like rather than disliking the race you dislike.
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 33 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,929
@previous (A)
> >The only reason a white person would use that term is racism.
> Now that is racist.
A racist screaming racism at something that is not racist. Nothing new there.
> >And when the Roman Empire was conquered by white barbarians what was the reason for staying Christian?
> The reason for staying with/converting to Christianity was to avoid being killed for being a heathen. Christianity is funny that way.
So when Rome had fallen and Christianity could be abandoned they stayed with it because??? Perhaps it was their inferior intellect that made then adhere to such fairy tales.
> >Your problem is that you don't know when you have lost and you insist on responding. But please do carry on and continue to prove me right.
> Cease your smugness and admit that you were wrong. Or just keep on chanting that you are right and that I am a hypocrite for disliking a race that I like rather than disliking the race you dislike.
I'm not chanting anything, you have done enough of that for both of us.
> >The only reason a white person would use that term is racism.
> Now that is racist.
A racist screaming racism at something that is not racist. Nothing new there.
> >And when the Roman Empire was conquered by white barbarians what was the reason for staying Christian?
> The reason for staying with/converting to Christianity was to avoid being killed for being a heathen. Christianity is funny that way.
So when Rome had fallen and Christianity could be abandoned they stayed with it because??? Perhaps it was their inferior intellect that made then adhere to such fairy tales.
> >Your problem is that you don't know when you have lost and you insist on responding. But please do carry on and continue to prove me right.
> Cease your smugness and admit that you were wrong. Or just keep on chanting that you are right and that I am a hypocrite for disliking a race that I like rather than disliking the race you dislike.
I'm not chanting anything, you have done enough of that for both of us.
Fats !lbanned8o6 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,930
@220,920 (A)> Cease your smugness and admit that you were wrong.
> admit that you were wrong.
> Leo Vegas
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,940
I hate piggies
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,943
@220,929 (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> A racist screaming racism at something that is not racist. Nothing new there.
Are you honestly trying to say that excluding a certain race from using a certain word ISN'T racist?
> So when Rome had fallen and Christianity could be abandoned they stayed with it because???
They stuck with it because of threat of violence from the converted Christians.
> Perhaps it was their inferior intellect that made then adhere to such fairy tales.
They're not the ones who formed the Christian religion, now are they.
> I'm not chanting anything, you have done enough of that for both of us.
I'll take that as your admission of being wrong.
@220,930 (Fats !lbanned8o6)
> Leo Vegas
> not a hypocrite
> A racist screaming racism at something that is not racist. Nothing new there.
Are you honestly trying to say that excluding a certain race from using a certain word ISN'T racist?
> So when Rome had fallen and Christianity could be abandoned they stayed with it because???
They stuck with it because of threat of violence from the converted Christians.
> Perhaps it was their inferior intellect that made then adhere to such fairy tales.
They're not the ones who formed the Christian religion, now are they.
> I'm not chanting anything, you have done enough of that for both of us.
I'll take that as your admission of being wrong.
@220,930 (Fats !lbanned8o6)
> Leo Vegas
> not a hypocrite
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,949
Opie is prett mad
!VoCaLoNunI replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,950
Fats !lbanned8o6 replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,953
@220,943 (A)
> Leo Vegas
> not a hypocrite
still im mamou, probally guna b here all nite! we been bbq'n since 1 n we still bbq'n! i love ma family! jus wish ma sista n jae was here ta make it complete! waitin ta c wut da nite brings! well well well cnt wait till friday! lovin ma fukn lyfe! got ma hata shades on, cnt fuk wid me. missin ma bae! wish ma car was fixd so i culd go c him! lovin his ways! hmu on da cell!
> Leo Vegas
> not a hypocrite
still im mamou, probally guna b here all nite! we been bbq'n since 1 n we still bbq'n! i love ma family! jus wish ma sista n jae was here ta make it complete! waitin ta c wut da nite brings! well well well cnt wait till friday! lovin ma fukn lyfe! got ma hata shades on, cnt fuk wid me. missin ma bae! wish ma car was fixd so i culd go c him! lovin his ways! hmu on da cell!
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,960
@220,943 (A)
> >A racist screaming racism at something that is not racist. Nothing new there.
> Are you honestly trying to say that excluding a certain race from using a certain word ISN'T racist?
I'm saying that it is hypocritical of you to call anything racist.
> >So when Rome had fallen and Christianity could be abandoned they stayed with it because???
> They stuck with it because of threat of violence from the converted Christians.
So they could conquer a world power but not Christianity?
> >Perhaps it was their inferior intellect that made then adhere to such fairy tales.
> They're not the ones who formed the Christian religion, now are they.
They are the ones who allowed it to flourish now aren't they?
> >I'm not chanting anything, you have done enough of that for both of us.
> I'll take that as your admission of being wrong.
So the one person who has been proving me right the entire time thinks I'm wrong. Hypocrite.
> >A racist screaming racism at something that is not racist. Nothing new there.
> Are you honestly trying to say that excluding a certain race from using a certain word ISN'T racist?
I'm saying that it is hypocritical of you to call anything racist.
> >So when Rome had fallen and Christianity could be abandoned they stayed with it because???
> They stuck with it because of threat of violence from the converted Christians.
So they could conquer a world power but not Christianity?
> >Perhaps it was their inferior intellect that made then adhere to such fairy tales.
> They're not the ones who formed the Christian religion, now are they.
They are the ones who allowed it to flourish now aren't they?
> >I'm not chanting anything, you have done enough of that for both of us.
> I'll take that as your admission of being wrong.
So the one person who has been proving me right the entire time thinks I'm wrong. Hypocrite.
(Edited 55 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 32 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,969
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> I'm saying that it is hypocritical of you to call anything racist.
Are you saying that racists can't call out racism? That may be hypocritical if I were denying the fact that I am racist, but I don't deny it.
> So they could conquer a world power but not Christianity?
They conquered a world power AFTER the Germanics converted to Christianity. The Scandinavians didn't even accept Christianity until the 8th-12th century. Scandinavia was the last to convert and the first to cast away Christianity.
> So the one person who has been proving me right the entire time thinks I'm wrong. Hypocrite.
The only thing that has been proven right in this part of the argument (you being a hypocrite for criticizing my prejudice while holding a similar prejudice) is me.
> I'm saying that it is hypocritical of you to call anything racist.
Are you saying that racists can't call out racism? That may be hypocritical if I were denying the fact that I am racist, but I don't deny it.
> So they could conquer a world power but not Christianity?
They conquered a world power AFTER the Germanics converted to Christianity. The Scandinavians didn't even accept Christianity until the 8th-12th century. Scandinavia was the last to convert and the first to cast away Christianity.
> So the one person who has been proving me right the entire time thinks I'm wrong. Hypocrite.
The only thing that has been proven right in this part of the argument (you being a hypocrite for criticizing my prejudice while holding a similar prejudice) is me.
Triptych !LightPenis joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,982
@220,903 (A)
Nigger was a term used during slave times. It was used to denote human chattel. It took away a black's humanity. That's why it's considered a racist term if used by a white, child. :3
Nigger was a term used during slave times. It was used to denote human chattel. It took away a black's humanity. That's why it's considered a racist term if used by a white, child. :3
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,984
@220,969 (A)
> >I'm saying that it is hypocritical of you to call anything racist.
> Are you saying that racists can't call out racism? That may be hypocritical if I were denying the fact that I am racist, but I don't deny it.
So then we can both agree that you are a hypocrite.
> >So they could conquer a world power but not Christianity?
> They conquered a world power AFTER the Germanics converted to Christianity. The Scandinavians didn't even accept Christianity until the 8th-12th century. Scandinavia was the last to convert and the first to cast away Christianity.
So then you agree that the Germanics were too weak minded to break away from Christianity.
> >So the one person who has been proving me right the entire time thinks I'm wrong. Hypocrite.
> The only thing that has been proven right in this part of the argument (you being a hypocrite for criticizing my prejudice while holding a similar prejudice) is me.
I have stated facts. You're the one who has been spouting racial slurs and proving your hypocrisy.
> >I'm saying that it is hypocritical of you to call anything racist.
> Are you saying that racists can't call out racism? That may be hypocritical if I were denying the fact that I am racist, but I don't deny it.
So then we can both agree that you are a hypocrite.
> >So they could conquer a world power but not Christianity?
> They conquered a world power AFTER the Germanics converted to Christianity. The Scandinavians didn't even accept Christianity until the 8th-12th century. Scandinavia was the last to convert and the first to cast away Christianity.
So then you agree that the Germanics were too weak minded to break away from Christianity.
> >So the one person who has been proving me right the entire time thinks I'm wrong. Hypocrite.
> The only thing that has been proven right in this part of the argument (you being a hypocrite for criticizing my prejudice while holding a similar prejudice) is me.
I have stated facts. You're the one who has been spouting racial slurs and proving your hypocrisy.
(Edited 42 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,994
@220,982 (Triptych !LightPenis)
That does not make it not racist to exclude a race from using the word.
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> > >I'm saying that it is hypocritical of you to call anything racist.
> > Are you saying that racists can't call out racism? That may be hypocritical if I were denying the fact that I am racist, but I don't deny it.
> So then we can both agree that you are a hypocrite.
I am a racist, not a hypocrite.
> > >So they could conquer a world power but not Christianity?
> > They conquered a world power AFTER the Germanics converted to Christianity. The Scandinavians didn't even accept Christianity until the 8th-12th century. Scandinavia was the last to convert and the first to cast away Christianity.
> So then you agree that the Germanics were too weak minded to break away from Christianity.
The germanics were weak and caved into Christianity yes, but the Nordics, however, kept on resisting and keeping their ideals until they began to embrace an amalgam of Christianity and Paganism.
> > >So the one person who has been proving me right the entire time thinks I'm wrong. Hypocrite.
> > The only thing that has been proven right in this part of the argument (you being a hypocrite for criticizing my prejudice while holding a similar prejudice) is me.
> I have stated facts. You're the one who has been spouting racial slurs and proving your hypocrisy.
What hypocrisy? I have little shame in my hatred of black trash just as you have little shame in your hatred of white trash. But you keep on denying it. You are like a child with their fingers in their ears going LALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU.
That does not make it not racist to exclude a race from using the word.
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
> > >I'm saying that it is hypocritical of you to call anything racist.
> > Are you saying that racists can't call out racism? That may be hypocritical if I were denying the fact that I am racist, but I don't deny it.
> So then we can both agree that you are a hypocrite.
I am a racist, not a hypocrite.
> > >So they could conquer a world power but not Christianity?
> > They conquered a world power AFTER the Germanics converted to Christianity. The Scandinavians didn't even accept Christianity until the 8th-12th century. Scandinavia was the last to convert and the first to cast away Christianity.
> So then you agree that the Germanics were too weak minded to break away from Christianity.
The germanics were weak and caved into Christianity yes, but the Nordics, however, kept on resisting and keeping their ideals until they began to embrace an amalgam of Christianity and Paganism.
> > >So the one person who has been proving me right the entire time thinks I'm wrong. Hypocrite.
> > The only thing that has been proven right in this part of the argument (you being a hypocrite for criticizing my prejudice while holding a similar prejudice) is me.
> I have stated facts. You're the one who has been spouting racial slurs and proving your hypocrisy.
What hypocrisy? I have little shame in my hatred of black trash just as you have little shame in your hatred of white trash. But you keep on denying it. You are like a child with their fingers in their ears going LALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU.
Fats !lbanned8o6 replied with this 15 years ago, 19 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #220,999
@previous (A)
What happened to you in the wave-pool back in '94? I have vague memories of two midgets stacked up wearing a rain-coat and a cowboy hat. The smell of lavender seems to spark something as well. Was "Room At the Top" by Adam Ant playing for some reason? Please. I know this is difficult for you. It is for me, too, but it is another step toward my recovery. Thank you!
What happened to you in the wave-pool back in '94? I have vague memories of two midgets stacked up wearing a rain-coat and a cowboy hat. The smell of lavender seems to spark something as well. Was "Room At the Top" by Adam Ant playing for some reason? Please. I know this is difficult for you. It is for me, too, but it is another step toward my recovery. Thank you!
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #221,047
@220,914 (A)
Latin did not die; fuck you are stupid. It simple changed slightly and evolved into several new languages.
Latin did not die; fuck you are stupid. It simple changed slightly and evolved into several new languages.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #221,048
@previous (J)
Latin is a dead language, meaning it has died. Fuck you are stupid.
It simple changed
Fuck you are stupid.
Latin is a dead language, meaning it has died. Fuck you are stupid.
It simple changed
Fuck you are stupid.
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #221,049
@220,994 (A)
You have contradicted yourself and proven nothing. If it was your aim to further cement the notion that you are nothing more than an undereducated child with no life experience then you have met success.
You have contradicted yourself and proven nothing. If it was your aim to further cement the notion that you are nothing more than an undereducated child with no life experience then you have met success.
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #221,050
@221,048 (A)
> Latin is a dead language, meaning it has died. Fuck you are stupid.
> It simple changed
> It simple changed
> It simple
You are one to be lecturing people on language.
> Fuck you are stupid
You are one to be lecturing people on being stupid.
> Latin is a dead language, meaning it has died. Fuck you are stupid.
> It simple changed
> It simple changed
> It simple
You are one to be lecturing people on language.
> Fuck you are stupid
You are one to be lecturing people on being stupid.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #221,052
@221,049 (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
I really like how you've resorted to petty insults. It shows how much you've lost this argument.
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
I meant to greentext "It simple changed" but I made a slight mistake with the backspace button. If you look at the reply I responded to, you'd clearly see that I was, in fact, insulting him for that typo.
I really like how you've resorted to petty insults. It shows how much you've lost this argument.
@previous (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
I meant to greentext "It simple changed" but I made a slight mistake with the backspace button. If you look at the reply I responded to, you'd clearly see that I was, in fact, insulting him for that typo.
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #221,055
@previous (A)
Excuses excuses. You feel the need to respond because you know you are wrong and have lost. Isn't that correct?
Excuses excuses. You feel the need to respond because you know you are wrong and have lost. Isn't that correct?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #221,056
dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #221,057
Anonymous J replied with this 15 years ago, 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #221,460
[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #225,200
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Oh fuck me.
Oh fuck me.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #225,243
@221,048 (A)
> Latin is a dead language, meaning it has died. Fuck you are stupid.
Lol, no. Old Latin, Classical Latin, Late Latin, Medieval Latin, Renaissance Latin and New Latin are dead languages. They developed, in that order, into the current standard, which is called Contemporary Latin.
> Latin is a dead language, meaning it has died. Fuck you are stupid.
Lol, no. Old Latin, Classical Latin, Late Latin, Medieval Latin, Renaissance Latin and New Latin are dead languages. They developed, in that order, into the current standard, which is called Contemporary Latin.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #225,245
Why was this thread bumped?