Topic: Quantum physics is a hoax for narcissistic middle class sweats.
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #122,202
Flawed experiments and incoherent theories, espoused by an all-jew network of "academics" leeching off of public education funds would have you believe that particles have no set position.
Their evidence? The particles are so small that their instruments interfere with the results they are measuring.
Here's a thought eggheads: just because you can't figure it out, just because it may be impossible to figure out, does not mean that particles are not in a set place.
Defunding physics is the answer. Millions of pretentious unproductive physics grads, but how many ever discover anything new in physics? 0.0001%.
Their evidence? The particles are so small that their instruments interfere with the results they are measuring.
Here's a thought eggheads: just because you can't figure it out, just because it may be impossible to figure out, does not mean that particles are not in a set place.
Defunding physics is the answer. Millions of pretentious unproductive physics grads, but how many ever discover anything new in physics? 0.0001%.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 24 minutes later[^] [v] #1,334,971
You must be a Trump supporter.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 21 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,972
So what's your solution genius
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,973
so like, quantum computing. what even is that
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,974
@1,334,971 (B)
95% of the people on this planet are not Americans, but that 5% seems to think everyone else is Americans just like them. Think before you speak, child.
95% of the people on this planet are not Americans, but that 5% seems to think everyone else is Americans just like them. Think before you speak, child.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,975
@previous (A)
I don't care if you're American. You still support Donald Trump if you think quantum physics is fake.
I don't care if you're American. You still support Donald Trump if you think quantum physics is fake.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 53 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,976
@1,334,973 (boof)
A technology that does not rely on the idea of a particle never really being in any one place.
A ball can spin. One particle of that ball, the smallest particle possible, can also spin. Quantum computing uses that principle to compute in a new way that is more efficient than traditional computers.
Some parts of quantum science are just common sense, real physics. Some scientists do real work involving that science. Most of the published work in quantum mechanics is just nonsense that real scientists don't have the time or inclination to dispell.
A technology that does not rely on the idea of a particle never really being in any one place.
A ball can spin. One particle of that ball, the smallest particle possible, can also spin. Quantum computing uses that principle to compute in a new way that is more efficient than traditional computers.
Some parts of quantum science are just common sense, real physics. Some scientists do real work involving that science. Most of the published work in quantum mechanics is just nonsense that real scientists don't have the time or inclination to dispell.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 48 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,977
@1,334,973 (boof)
Classic computers (like we're using) use bits to process information. A bit can be a 0, or a 1.
Quantum computing uses qubits that can be a 0, a 1 or both all at the same time. They also use a process called entanglement, which allows qubits to be connected in a way that is very powerful for certain tasks.
Classic computers (like we're using) use bits to process information. A bit can be a 0, or a 1.
Quantum computing uses qubits that can be a 0, a 1 or both all at the same time. They also use a process called entanglement, which allows qubits to be connected in a way that is very powerful for certain tasks.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,978
@1,334,975 (B)
I don't follow American politics, it's just decadent capitalist psychopaths paying marketing teams to enrage the people.
Certainly Trump will not dismantle the physics departments, he is part of the same system that produces that incoherent nonsense. The powers that be want to distract people with any form of entertainment and shiny fads so that they cannot develop a class consciousness.
I don't follow American politics, it's just decadent capitalist psychopaths paying marketing teams to enrage the people.
Certainly Trump will not dismantle the physics departments, he is part of the same system that produces that incoherent nonsense. The powers that be want to distract people with any form of entertainment and shiny fads so that they cannot develop a class consciousness.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 46 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,979
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,981
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,982
@previous (boof)
Superconducting materials (the Google one uses this), or trapped ions, or optical splitters on silicon, or there's a cool one that is a synthetic diamond with specifically engineered flaws. It's highly experimental so there are a bunch of different methods. Google and IBM swear by the superconducting materials chip type, but the weakness is it has to be kept at almost absolute zero to work. There's some Japanese lab doing the ion trap thing, but it's supposed to be not as powerful.
Superconducting materials (the Google one uses this), or trapped ions, or optical splitters on silicon, or there's a cool one that is a synthetic diamond with specifically engineered flaws. It's highly experimental so there are a bunch of different methods. Google and IBM swear by the superconducting materials chip type, but the weakness is it has to be kept at almost absolute zero to work. There's some Japanese lab doing the ion trap thing, but it's supposed to be not as powerful.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,991
Do you mean swedes