Minichan

Topic: Why should the jury believe Luigi did it?

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #122,066

AI generated videos are available for the public to make today. The cops could have doctored up a video to frame him, any idiot could do that to convince the public they did their job.

Any lawyer should get this guy out of jail ASAP.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 52 minutes later[^] [v] #1,333,611

#JusticeForLuigi

Anonymous B double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,612

The prosecutions entire argument: "Trust me bro"

Anonymous B triple-posted this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,616

The 480p CCTV footage: Deepfaked
The DNA results: They're still tuning the black box algorithm to give the result they want, anti-scientific hokum produced by highly-motivated data-hackers
The items placed in evidence upon arrest: planted by police, probably

I have reasonable doubts.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,617

@previous (B)
Prosecutors still use bitemark analysis and the police still use polygraphs, both are pseudoscience. Exhibit A on Netflix goes over how fake it all is.

Generating believable CCTV footage on Sora is very easy, then crop the watermark. These pigs just found the first guy they could and some rookie stayed up all night tweaking the deepfakes.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 33 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,619

What I want to know is, if Luigi truly carried out this shooting, then why would he have fled on an e-bike and not have simply jumped down a green pipe to instantly get away?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 9 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,674

@previous (C)
Stay current with the news. He admitted to it in a note he wrote and had on his person. So it's no longer an IF.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 56 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,685

@previous (D)
Gullible shits like you are a prosecutors wet dream.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,687

@previous (A)
Luigi?? They giving you internet access in that cell??

Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 2 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,688

@1,333,685 (A)
So, you think the Gun will not match the bullets. Or the suppressor or the 4 fake ID's.
Also he gave lots of evidence in person until his brain reminded him to shut the fuck up and only Later ask for a Lawyer.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,690

@previous (D)

Have you not read the other thread? The shadow cabal of plain clothes cops have used their unlimited resources to frame this guy in particular.

Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,691

@previous (F)
> their unlimited resources
Ya forget it was his desire for this AND NOT any unlimited resources that will have him ending up, with all the gay sex he desires and quality prison food.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,692

@previous (D)

Ha ha rape is so funny

Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,693

@previous (F)
I did say
> all the gay sex he desires

He grew up with VERY Rich parents. Lived a privilege life. Soon he will dwell in luxury.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,695

@previous (D)

Looks nicer than my place tbh

Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,696

@previous (F)
Perhaps yet you get to step outside. Walk to a nice park. Flirt with some girls. To go from luxury to a tiny cell...
Perhaps he will end up with a bunk bed for a cell mate. Space remains the same.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,727

Mario did it. Taking the fall for it.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,763

@1,333,693 (D)
Illegible gibberish.

Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,771

@1,333,688 (D)
The bore pattern of a 3D printed gun? Get serious. The "forensics lab" is pulling an all nighter as we speak to print up a match

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,777

@1,333,727 (G)

> Mario did it. Taking the fall for it.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,782

@1,333,771 (B)
This is the average American's mindset now. No wonder this country is going to shit.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,807

@1,333,690 (F)
> The shadow cabal of plain clothes cops
The police do explicitly admit to having undercover operations.

> have used their unlimited resources
The NYPD has a larger budget, and more manpower than many national armies. Generating CCTV footage is no obstacle.

> to frame this guy in particular.
They released photos of different people in a desperate attempt to convince people he did it. Now they can silence a critic of the for-profit healthcare industry at the same time they take pressure off to find the killer.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,831

@previous (A)
Yes if there was a guy running around killing CEOs, the rich and powerful would say "hey just nab some random guy who didn't do it and frame him so the murderer can remain free to murder us."

Have you considered joining Mensa?

Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,837

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
They wouldn't want to risk pursuing a jury murder trial, because even with all their fake evidence production capabilities, they know some of us still have our wits about us and that the legal standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt" is too high to clear. They would simply assassinate the person they truly suspect of committing the crime (assuming he isn't a current agent of the state) and then hold a fake trial using a random fall guy.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,840

@previous (B)

I think you are utterly delusional

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,841

@1,333,837 (B)
So they would not risk using fake evidence for the real guy who left real evidence behind because people are too smart to fall for that. Instead they will use fake evidence for the fake guy because that will fool people. Do I have that right?

Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 11 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,842

@1,333,840 (F)
But not Fake Anon who just suggested that the rich and powerful control the police and the nation's systems of justice?

(Edited 14 minutes later.)

Anonymous B double-posted this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,843

@1,333,841 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yes, exactly. The real shooter is already dead or has assumed a new identity by now. Now they put on the show trial in an attempt to quell discontent. It would be the least risky move for the scared CEOs who, in your hypothesis, run the entire justice system in America

(Edited 10 minutes later.)

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,847

@1,333,842 (B)

Fake Anon is blatantly being sarcastic

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,851

@1,333,843 (B)
That wasn't my theory, I was adopting your framing of the issue to try and show why it was somewhere between foolish and insane.

Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,853

@1,333,843 (B)
You should sue your mother for dropping you on your head. Now you're going to tell us Ted was innocent.

Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,861

@1,333,851 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You were strawmanning, nobody had said anything about the "rich and powerful" at that point. And now I can't play your same silly little games? You literally heard the other Anon say "They", referring to the police, and immediately likened their statement to a "Crazy conspiracy theory about the elite!"

(Edited 4 minutes later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,882

@1,333,831 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
They won't stop looking for him, so this changes nothing. They'll disappear the real killer if they find him. That, or the whole job was orchestrated by UH investors looking to stop the insider trading investigation.

You're talking as if they need to let him go once the patsy is taken in, or that the real risk is him doing this again. No, the real risk is the masses see this and think he got away with it, inspiring copycats emboldened by the thought of impunity.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,887

@1,333,861 (B)
You are donkey brained!!

Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,333,949

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
I have proof that I am not.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.