Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago#122,066
AI generated videos are available for the public to make today. The cops could have doctored up a video to frame him, any idiot could do that to convince the public they did their job.
Anonymous B triple-posted this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,333,616
The 480p CCTV footage: Deepfaked
The DNA results: They're still tuning the black box algorithm to give the result they want, anti-scientific hokum produced by highly-motivated data-hackers
The items placed in evidence upon arrest: planted by police, probably
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,333,617
@previous (B)
Prosecutors still use bitemark analysis and the police still use polygraphs, both are pseudoscience. Exhibit A on Netflix goes over how fake it all is.
Generating believable CCTV footage on Sora is very easy, then crop the watermark. These pigs just found the first guy they could and some rookie stayed up all night tweaking the deepfakes.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 33 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,333,619
What I want to know is, if Luigi truly carried out this shooting, then why would he have fled on an e-bike and not have simply jumped down a green pipe to instantly get away?
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 2 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,333,688
@1,333,685 (A)
So, you think the Gun will not match the bullets. Or the suppressor or the 4 fake ID's.
Also he gave lots of evidence in person until his brain reminded him to shut the fuck up and only Later ask for a Lawyer.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,333,691
@previous (F) > their unlimited resources
Ya forget it was his desire for this AND NOT any unlimited resources that will have him ending up, with all the gay sex he desires and quality prison food.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,333,696
@previous (F)
Perhaps yet you get to step outside. Walk to a nice park. Flirt with some girls. To go from luxury to a tiny cell...
Perhaps he will end up with a bunk bed for a cell mate. Space remains the same.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,333,807
@1,333,690 (F) > The shadow cabal of plain clothes cops
The police do explicitly admit to having undercover operations.
> have used their unlimited resources
The NYPD has a larger budget, and more manpower than many national armies. Generating CCTV footage is no obstacle.
> to frame this guy in particular.
They released photos of different people in a desperate attempt to convince people he did it. Now they can silence a critic of the for-profit healthcare industry at the same time they take pressure off to find the killer.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,333,831
@previous (A)
Yes if there was a guy running around killing CEOs, the rich and powerful would say "hey just nab some random guy who didn't do it and frame him so the murderer can remain free to murder us."
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,333,837
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
They wouldn't want to risk pursuing a jury murder trial, because even with all their fake evidence production capabilities, they know some of us still have our wits about us and that the legal standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt" is too high to clear. They would simply assassinate the person they truly suspect of committing the crime (assuming he isn't a current agent of the state) and then hold a fake trial using a random fall guy.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,333,841
@1,333,837 (B)
So they would not risk using fake evidence for the real guy who left real evidence behind because people are too smart to fall for that. Instead they will use fake evidence for the fake guy because that will fool people. Do I have that right?
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,333,843
@1,333,841 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yes, exactly. The real shooter is already dead or has assumed a new identity by now. Now they put on the show trial in an attempt to quell discontent. It would be the least risky move for the scared CEOs who, in your hypothesis, run the entire justice system in America
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,333,861
@1,333,851 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You were strawmanning, nobody had said anything about the "rich and powerful" at that point. And now I can't play your same silly little games? You literally heard the other Anon say "They", referring to the police, and immediately likened their statement to a "Crazy conspiracy theory about the elite!"
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,333,882
@1,333,831 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
They won't stop looking for him, so this changes nothing. They'll disappear the real killer if they find him. That, or the whole job was orchestrated by UH investors looking to stop the insider trading investigation.
You're talking as if they need to let him go once the patsy is taken in, or that the real risk is him doing this again. No, the real risk is the masses see this and think he got away with it, inspiring copycats emboldened by the thought of impunity.