Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Topic: Cage-fighting event with two boys aged eight and nine causes controversy
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago#12,193
> A cage-fighting event which involved a bout between two boys aged eight and nine has generated worldwide headlines and outrage, yet many other people regard it as a healthy, harmless activity.
> After seeing video of the boys' fight, held at a Labour club in Preston earlier this month, Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt said it "feels very barbaric" and acknowledged that if children took part "some people will ask some questions".
> Lancashire Police, however, will be asking no more questions - officers had "looked into this matter fully and there are no issues for us to pursue," they said.
> The boys took part in a demonstration wrestling bout that involved submissions, but no punching or kicking.
sluggy joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#219,966
It's just cause it's in a cage.
!VoCaLoNunI joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#219,986
So did you paint them red too?
Or did you shine lasers in their eyes?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 34 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#220,042
@219,966 (sluggy)
Probably, and all the grown men watching. But they weren't kicking or punching so I don't see the need for all this hysteria.
sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#220,044
@previous (A)
I highly doubt the men watching were getting off.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#220,106
@previous (sluggy)
And where in my post did I connotate that they were "getting off" watching it?
sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#220,110
@previous (A) > Probably, and all the grown men watching.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#220,113
@previous (sluggy)
Fail to see where I implied they were somehow "getting off" sexually or otherwise. You were the only one to come up with that nonsense.
sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#220,120
@previous (A)
My mistake. I should've know since they were boys, and boys are gross and dirty and no one but weirdos who molest their brothers and paint their calipers would find them appealing.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#220,129
@previous (sluggy)
I love my little brother very much and would never hurt or "molest" him. Can you stop that and pick on a real criminal?
sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#220,150
@previous (A)
Look, I didn't say you would. I was just describing the type of person who would enjoy watching two young boys wrestle shirtless.
green joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#220,176