"A young female farm worker was fed alive to a herd of pigs"
Paragraph 2:
"Igor Zaika admits attacking his boss's 17-year-old daughter, and is believed to have knocked her unconscious and left her to be mauled to death by pigs"
Paragraph 4:
"It was originally thought that she had been attacked and killed solely by aggressive pigs, but now officers say they only mauled her after she was knocked out"
Conclusion: if you did indeed read the whole thing and still think a girl was "fed alive to a herd of pigs" then you're a retard, which the Daily Mail banks on you being.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,331,228
@previous (B)
Yes. Do YOU understand that someone fleeing an unconscious person who later gets mauled doesn't mean they've "fed them to a herd of pigs"?
If you knock someone unconscious and throw them into the floor of a pigpen and they are eaten by pigs, then I think it's accurate to say that you've fed someone to pigs.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,331,257
@previous (C) > That Igor Zaika did not feed a 17 year old girl to pigs
From the article:
> 'The man deliberately left the girl to be eaten by pigs, because he knew that the animals would attack the body', said a report by news outlet Readovka.
If you knock someone out knowing they'll be mauled by pigs, and they're mauled by pigs, you have fed that person to pigs.
> >That Igor Zaika did not feed a 17 year old girl to pigs > > From the article: > > >'The man deliberately left the girl to be eaten by pigs, because he knew that the animals would attack the body, said a report by news outlet Readovka. > > If you knock someone out knowing they'll be mauled by pigs, and they're mauled by pigs, you have fed that person to pigs.
Once more: she was not eaten by pigs.
And 2nd: what you've quoted about intent is speculation by an unnamed newspaper source.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,331,264
@1,331,259 (C) > Once more: she was not eaten by pigs.
She was left to be mauled and died from massive blood loss after sustaining multiple bite injuries. She doesn't need to have been cooked and hand-fed to them for it to be fair to say she was "fed to pigs". The Daily Mail is using the same language as Readovka.
Victims of Roman damnatio ad bestias often weren't literally eaten either, yet we still describe them as being "fed to the animals" or "eaten alive".
Also, thanks for agreeing she was not eaten by pigs and hence the story is bullshit.
> and died from massive blood loss after sustaining multiple bite injuries.
Not what the article says.
Also, thanks for again agreeing she was not fed to pigs.
You think a guy attacks and rapes a woman and then flees the scene leaving her still alive in the belief that a bunch of 'domesticated' pigs she'd literally just been feeding would finish off the job?
> Why would a news article about a person being charged with murder go into detail about how pigs devour humans?
Because it's a tabloid paper suggesting her boyfriend was met with a sickening scene of...er, what looked like a few "bite marks". If that girl's guts has been eaten out then believe me the Daily Mail of all tabloids would have it in the headline.
> You think a guy attacks and rapes a woman and then flees the scene leaving her still alive in the belief that a bunch of 'domesticated' pigs she'd literally just been feeding would finish off the job?
By his own admission, yes.
Житель деревни Укшанка, который ранее был задержан по подозрению в убийстве по неосторожности, признался, что специально оставил школьницу на съедение свиньям. Об этом сообщило ГСУ СК РФ по Красноярскому краю и Республике Хакасия.
A resident of the village of Ukshanka, who was previously detained on suspicion of manslaughter, admitted that he deliberately left the schoolgirl to be eaten by pigs. This was reported by the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for Krasnoyarsk Krai and the Republic of Khakassia.
Citation needed. Show his confession. Or you're trusting the word of an unnamed Russian government official that this "vodka-fuelled" drunken wreck who fled the scene in terror had this masterplan all along?
> Preliminary forensic data indicate that the schoolgirl died from blood loss caused by damage to the femoral artery. TASS (Earliest report, before the guy's confession.)
> Law enforcement officials believe that the man wanted to take revenge on her father, his boss, and slaughter his cattle, but he came across the girl and hit her several times with a stick. The girl lost consciousness and fell in the barn, the pigs bit through her femoral artery, and she died from blood loss. https://www.gazeta.ru/social/2024/11/26/20139307.shtml
> The drunk and disgruntled employee took a stick and hit the schoolgirl on the head several times. She fell. The neighbor knew that the girl could have been attacked by pigs, but left her lying in the barn and disappeared. The man was detained. During interrogation, he fully admitted his guilt. радио «Красноярск Главный»
> The man knew that the pigs could eat the body, so he left it and walked away. In order to cover up the crime, he burned the deceased's phone and a log. https://readovka.news/news/212529
> According to detectives, last Saturday the farmer and his wife left for Krasnoyarsk, and the drunk worker decided to kill the boss's animals out of revenge, took a knife, a log and made his way into the farm building with the cattle. Seeing the girl there, he hit her several times on the head with a birch log and then left her unconscious, realizing that the pigs could attack the schoolgirl. > > "To cover up the traces of the crime, the man took a telephone and a log from the scene of the crime, after which he burned them in the stove at his home," the department said. https://rg.ru/2024/11/27/reg-sibfo/na-soseda-pogibshej-pod-krasnoiarskom-shkolnicy-zaveli-delo-o-zhestokom-ubijstve.html
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 51 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,331,291
So it's clearly being widely reported that he knew she would be attacked if left alone and unconscious, and confessed as such. You don't have to be a cattleman, which he is, to know pigs will maul and eat a lifeless body: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/02/oregon-farmer-eaten-by-pigs
Anonymous F double-posted this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,331,292
@1,331,290 (C)
Some time after he attacked her and fed her to the pigs, her family intervened and found her lifeless body. She had already sustained massive blood loss from the pig bites to her femoral artery (her finger was also bitten off), and sadly succumbed to her injuries.
> Some time after he attacked her and fed her to the pigs, her family intervened and found her lifeless body.
"Some time after I fed my girlfriend the cake, my sister walked in and discovered the cake"
You're a special one aren't you?
And it was hours before the family showed up because they'd been trying to contact the boyfriend, yet all the wild voracious herd of pigs had done was nibble a finger?
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,331,305
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Exactly. They chewed her ear off, bit through her femoral artery, and left her covered in bite marks. That qualifies.
The article doesn't even say she was "eaten" anyway. It says she was "fed to pigs". If I hear that someone knocked a dude out and fed them to wolves but they miraculously survived, I wouldn't bat an eyelid at their use of "fed".
> Would you complain if someone said, "I left my unconscious dog in the vicinity of food and then fled the house in a drunken panic. It's what I call feeding!"
Fixed to show you you're a special one, aren't you.
> You're clearly not an expert in how pigs eat humans. They tear open the belly and consume the innards.
Weird how that girl's belly and innards were untouched. Maybe the rapacious herd of pigs were planning on nibbling their way to her guts via her pinkie.
> Your own article that says the extent of her injuries was a cut on her thigh and her little pinkie sustaining a nibble.
False. It mentions those injuries but never claims they were the full extent of her injuries.
We don't know the full extent yet. We only know she had injuries to her head, leg, and hand. The TASS article cites a "preliminary medical report". The NIA-Hakasia article describes "multiple animal bite marks on the head and various parts of the body" and closes to say a "forensic medical examination has been ordered and is ongoing".
So we know her finger was bitten and her thigh was cut but they're still trying to figure out the little detail of whether or not her belly was torn open and her innards ripped out?