Topic: Matt Gaetz as Attorney General
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #121,597
Legit lolling.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,329,186
Trump just abolished the age of consent.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,193
His appointments are fucking insane.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,194
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 42 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,195
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,196
@previous (C)
straight, white, rich, old male Biden appointed these two straight, white, rich, old males.
straight, white, rich, old male Biden appointed these two straight, white, rich, old males.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,197
@previous (B)
Which is why we need other people. And are you sure that gentleman on the right is a straight man?
Which is why we need other people. And are you sure that gentleman on the right is a straight man?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,201
I support this because he seems like he'd be very bad at his job and we need as many ineffective and useless people in the Trump administration as possible.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 2 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,202
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,204
Anonymous B triple-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,205
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,207
@1,329,204 (B)
@previous (B)
I don't think Trump will appoint either of these people to a role in his administration.
@previous (B)
I don't think Trump will appoint either of these people to a role in his administration.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 36 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,208
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,210
@1,329,201 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> I support this because he seems like he'd be very bad at his job and we need as many ineffective and useless people in the Trump administration as possible.
He's the only cast member of Trump Season 5 likely to keep his job into Season 6, because unlike Sessions and Barr he's going to do his level best to turn the office of AG into Trump's personal law firm.
That said and given how the Republicans disdain him as much as the Democrats (Ultra-MAGA loons aside), I'm thinking of this baffling pick as a test of fealty. Ninety percent of congressional Republicans would affirm the BTK killer for a cabinet position if ordered to do so by Il Duce, and here's where he ferrets out the other 10.
> I support this because he seems like he'd be very bad at his job and we need as many ineffective and useless people in the Trump administration as possible.
He's the only cast member of Trump Season 5 likely to keep his job into Season 6, because unlike Sessions and Barr he's going to do his level best to turn the office of AG into Trump's personal law firm.
That said and given how the Republicans disdain him as much as the Democrats (Ultra-MAGA loons aside), I'm thinking of this baffling pick as a test of fealty. Ninety percent of congressional Republicans would affirm the BTK killer for a cabinet position if ordered to do so by Il Duce, and here's where he ferrets out the other 10.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,212
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,216
What the fuck man
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,217
@1,329,195 (C)
> We need more people who are not straight, white, rich, old men in government.
Why? Is there any evidence at all that gay, black, poor young women are better at governing?
> We need more people who are not straight, white, rich, old men in government.
Why? Is there any evidence at all that gay, black, poor young women are better at governing?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,329,223
@1,329,210 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
I never want to predict anyone lasting long in a Trump administration, but if he spends most of his time suing CNN or the NYT for being mean to Trump instead of gutting the Clean Air or Voting Rights Acts I'll take that as a win. I'm not sure there's a whole lot else left to hope for tbh.
I never want to predict anyone lasting long in a Trump administration, but if he spends most of his time suing CNN or the NYT for being mean to Trump instead of gutting the Clean Air or Voting Rights Acts I'll take that as a win. I'm not sure there's a whole lot else left to hope for tbh.
(Edited 59 minutes later.)