Topic: I'm a liberal, but I agree Trump did not actually say that
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #121,372
He did not say he wants Liz Cheney to be shot. He imagined a hypothetical scenario in war where she would run away if guns were pointed at her. He did not say that he wanted guns to be pointed at her. See, unlike the Trump cultists, I can admit when liberals are wrong.
boof joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,327,138
If I saw Trump about to rape a girl, I'd slit his fuckin throught
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 6 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,140
boof replied with this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,143
the hypothetical slit
Chuckle Brother 2 !ErY2TknG0w joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,159
Shut the fuck up Matt
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 4 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,183
He did say if he loses there will be massive bloodshed
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,184
He also mimicked giving a microphone a blowjob at a Milwaukee conference yesterday. Such a man of God
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 33 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,191
@OP"Trump Assails Liz Cheney and Imagines Guns ‘Shooting at Her’
"“Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face.”
boof replied with this 1 month ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,227
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 11 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,230
@1,327,183 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> He did say if he loses there will be massive bloodshed
He was talking about the markets.
> He did say if he loses there will be massive bloodshed
He was talking about the markets.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 month ago, 10 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,231
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,233
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Not really, in fact it's very common to use warlike language to describe such things.
Not really, in fact it's very common to use warlike language to describe such things.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,234
@1,327,231 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> What an odd way to describe such a thing
You've not heard such phrases as "there'll be carnage in the markets"?
> What an odd way to describe such a thing
You've not heard such phrases as "there'll be carnage in the markets"?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,236
@1,327,233 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
@previous (F)
We have different standards for someone who is the president or for someone who is running for president
@previous (F)
We have different standards for someone who is the president or for someone who is running for president
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 1 month ago, 11 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,237
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 10 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,304
@1,327,231 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> What an odd way to describe such a thing
It is relatively common, surprisingly: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=markets+bloodshed
> What an odd way to describe such a thing
It is relatively common, surprisingly: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=markets+bloodshed
Meta !Sober//iZs double-posted this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,305
@OP
Now do "fine people" which even Snopes has debunked.
Now do "fine people" which even Snopes has debunked.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 15 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,307
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 1 month ago, 7 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,308
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,309
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
The rally. The Nazis, and the anti-Nazis. How many tens of thousands of horrible things does he have to say before you take it seriously and stop trying to clean it up for him?
The rally. The Nazis, and the anti-Nazis. How many tens of thousands of horrible things does he have to say before you take it seriously and stop trying to clean it up for him?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,311
@previous (A)
> write off half the country
> they don't support you politically
shocked_pikachu.jpg.exe
> write off half the country
> they don't support you politically
shocked_pikachu.jpg.exe
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 13 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,313
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 30 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,314
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,315
@1,327,309 (A)
Debunked. Stop spreading misinformation: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
Debunked. Stop spreading misinformation: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
Chuckle Brother 2 !ErY2TknG0w replied with this 1 month ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,316
Shut the fuck up Matt.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,317
@1,327,315 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Not debunked. The entire world saw him say it. Go gaslight someone else.
Not debunked. The entire world saw him say it. Go gaslight someone else.
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 1 month ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,470
@1,327,309 (A)
> The rally. The Nazis, and the anti-Nazis.
Not everyone at UtR was a Nazi, which is what he was saying.
> The rally. The Nazis, and the anti-Nazis.
Not everyone at UtR was a Nazi, which is what he was saying.