Notice: Proxies are blocked from creating accounts. Please visit the site without using a proxy first or restore your ID.

Minichan

Topic: Project 2025 will ban all porn in the US

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #121,367

Is THAT enough to convince you pervs not to vote for Trump?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,327,116

Voting for Trump, and this is good to hear.

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 11 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,117

Oh god. This will be almost as bad as that wall he made Mexico pay for.

Chuffed !m8sJfgzmLE joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 49 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,121

Worst they can do at this point is make a sin tax (alcohol, cigarettes, weed, gasoline). Both sides like money too much.

boof joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,133

Trump has said himself he will do this. I don't know what kind of game people play thinking that his word is good only when it is for what you agree with him doing, and that he'll conveniently not do what you disagree with him doing. I disagree with such a casual antifreedom attitude in any case. Way too much of the smell of the busibody evangelicals in there.

Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 55 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,136

@previous (boof)
Good, he should. Porn isn't my number #1 priority.

Why do Democrats put sexual degeneracy as all their top priorities?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 8 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,182

@1,327,133 (boof)
Its weird because even if he won't do these things, they should care that he says he will

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,215

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Its weird because even if he won't do these things, they should care that he says he will
Except he never said he would do those things. If he did, then please paste a video link.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 month ago, 24 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,217

@previous (G)
I didn't say he did

I said, even if he doesn't accomplish what he claims, saying he will do things is very important as well

Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 13 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,312

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> I didn't say he did

@1,327,182 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> they should care that he says he will

> he says he will

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 41 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,319

The whole rise of Trump and the maga movement is proof that idiocracy was not merly satire but also prophecy which is now sadly fulfilled.

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,349

I don't have any problems whatsoever with criminalizing porn. It has nothing but deleterious effects for everyone except the producer company.

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,351

@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
Let's ban sex while we are at it.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 month ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,366

@1,327,312 (B)
Learn to read

Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 15 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,449

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> they should care that he says he will

Why should they care about that if it didn't happen?

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,451

@previous (B)

When she said "he says he will", she obviously didn't say that he said he will. What she actually said was something completely different... Learn to read!

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,464

You guys think the progressives aren't capable of banning porn too? All they need to do is say it's offensive to: women, gays, blacks, etc and pull the plug. We'll be left with a bunch of Lizzos strutting around on stage for entertainment - that's all you get.

Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,477

@1,327,451 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
This must be like when she said women couldn't have bank accounts, and didn't actually mean women couldn't have bank accounts.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,490

I can’t wait for the massive porn black market this is going to cause.

Anonymous G replied with this 1 month ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,498

You (@1,327,182 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)):
> he says he will

Me (@1,327,215 (G)):
> he never said he would do those things.

You (@1,327,217 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)):
> I didn't say he did.

Yes, you did. And you said it again:
> saying he will do things

I repeat, he never said he will do those things.

Indie the Grate joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,506

@previous (G)
> Obsession

Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,537

@previous (Indie the Grate)
Kook has a habit of writing one thing, and then insisting a completely separate thing without understanding the difference.

Indie the Grate replied with this 1 month ago, 19 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,547

@previous (B)
Kook also has a habit of attracting deranged, obsessive stalkers. Thanks.

Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 48 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,563

@previous (Indie the Grate)
Did someone ask to see her vulva?

Anonymous G replied with this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,567

@1,327,506 (Indie the Grate)
Sorry but two comments, one being to point out a direct contradiction, is not even close to what one might label "obsession".

Indie the Grate replied with this 1 month ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,570

@previous (G)
Whom do you feel that I was accusing of "obsession", praytell?

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 43 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,572

@1,327,563 (B)

> Did someone ask to see her vulva?

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 1 month ago, 21 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,573

This might even be worse than the time he deported all the illegal immigrants!

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 54 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,583

AI is going to kill porn either way.

Anonymous G replied with this 1 month ago, 7 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,327,646

@1,327,570 (Indie the Grate)
> Whom do you feel that I was accusing of "obsession", praytell?
Since you commented on my post, I, in fact, thought it might be I.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.