Topic: is there a compiled list on some site of all the feminists lies debunked?
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #121,321
E.g.
- rule of thumb means you can beat your wife
- women weren't allowed to have bank accounts
- Bible verse against homosex actually translates to no pedo
- pay gap for same jobs
Etc.
- rule of thumb means you can beat your wife
- women weren't allowed to have bank accounts
- Bible verse against homosex actually translates to no pedo
- pay gap for same jobs
Etc.
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,326,701
I think the low hanging fruit ones would be on snopes
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,703
@previous (boof)
Really? I thought they were liberal
And they wouldn't have a list would they? It would be separate pages to find
Really? I thought they were liberal
And they wouldn't have a list would they? It would be separate pages to find
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,705
@previous (A)
right -- I don't think they purport to be any specific political stripe, but they get a liberal label from propagandists who deliberately spread bullshit by various means in the older media, then by email, and that was a vast resource of shit to debunk. These liars hate it when you debunk them, and train the public to dismiss them as agents of some opposing political group. Snopes never set out to be a political group.
I mean, I wanted to check about the boiling a frog metaphor, and noticed they did not have it yet, so I submitted the idea and soon they had a page on it.
I'm trying to find the forum they used to have, but it looks like that disappeard -- it was a second resource to see what people discussed about content on the site, shame
right -- I don't think they purport to be any specific political stripe, but they get a liberal label from propagandists who deliberately spread bullshit by various means in the older media, then by email, and that was a vast resource of shit to debunk. These liars hate it when you debunk them, and train the public to dismiss them as agents of some opposing political group. Snopes never set out to be a political group.
I mean, I wanted to check about the boiling a frog metaphor, and noticed they did not have it yet, so I submitted the idea and soon they had a page on it.
I'm trying to find the forum they used to have, but it looks like that disappeard -- it was a second resource to see what people discussed about content on the site, shame
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
boof double-posted this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,706
OK, wikipedia has a page devoted to false etymologies of words and phrases, and the thumb one is there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_false_etymologies_of_English_words
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_false_etymologies_of_English_words
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,711
Women weren't allowed to have bank accounts
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,717
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,719
Can you not debunk for yourself
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,722
build a better debunking compilation, and the world will beat a path to your patreon
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,726
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 41 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,728
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,729
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,730
@1,326,711 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
There was never a law that said that, and there are many women who had bank accounts from back then.
Women inherited money, had jobs, and even got credit.
The myth stemmed from some banks requiring a cosigner for credit because most women didn't have jobs.
Please show any laws or other evidence that women were prohibited from opening bank accounts. Not just some random gender studies professor claiming it without their own source.
My grandmother was from that era and had a bank account, as did her mother. There's biographies where women talk about having these accounts too.
@1,326,719 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
I have a few already, but I'm sure theres more. It would also be convenient for people who don't know about any of these yet.
There was never a law that said that, and there are many women who had bank accounts from back then.
Women inherited money, had jobs, and even got credit.
The myth stemmed from some banks requiring a cosigner for credit because most women didn't have jobs.
Please show any laws or other evidence that women were prohibited from opening bank accounts. Not just some random gender studies professor claiming it without their own source.
My grandmother was from that era and had a bank account, as did her mother. There's biographies where women talk about having these accounts too.
@1,326,719 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
I have a few already, but I'm sure theres more. It would also be convenient for people who don't know about any of these yet.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,732
@previous (A)
They had to pass laws to allow women to have bank accounts and other rights
Your passed on anecdotes don't erase women's reality of the past
Requiring male cosigners for women to have bank accounts was discrimination
They had to pass laws to allow women to have bank accounts and other rights
Your passed on anecdotes don't erase women's reality of the past
Requiring male cosigners for women to have bank accounts was discrimination
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,733
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 34 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,737
I'm wondering if I misremember snopes ever having a forum now
the wayback machine only started saving snopes in 2021 for fuck sake
the wayback machine only started saving snopes in 2021 for fuck sake
boof double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,740
so like, how many items would the list have
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,745
@1,326,732 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
>Women weren't allowed to have bank accounts
> Many women had bank accounts, businesses weren't forced to lend to women.
Got it.
>
> Many women had bank accounts, businesses weren't forced to lend to women.
Got it.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,746
@1,326,733 (G)
That image almost seems to imply that women only got the right to open them in the 1960s.
Women had bank accounts in the 1800s.
That image almost seems to imply that women only got the right to open them in the 1960s.
Women had bank accounts in the 1800s.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,747
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,748
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,749
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,750
as opposed to fat
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 8 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,772
I was denied getting a bank account because I was unemployed. I went to another bank. They gave me an account. So were unemployed people not allowed bank accounts (this was 1988 btw)?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,773
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 23 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,776
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,777
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,780
@1,326,773 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You equated no law to force businesses to lend to these women with not being allowed to have bank accounts.
If you don't understand the difference then you have a mental defect that prevents you from comprehending the meaning of words.
You equated no law to force businesses to lend to these women with not being allowed to have bank accounts.
If you don't understand the difference then you have a mental defect that prevents you from comprehending the meaning of words.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 34 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,782
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,789
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,792
@previous (H)
> > Make false claim
> > Get passive aggressive when called out
I'm fully aggressive, moron
> > Make false claim
> > Get passive aggressive when called out
I'm fully aggressive, moron
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 59 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,793
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,795
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,803
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
What is your diagnosis?
Borderline personality disorder?
What is your diagnosis?
Borderline personality disorder?
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,817
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,825
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 31 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,826
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,827
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,828
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,831
Jeepers, what's going on now
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 57 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,839
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,840
@1,326,772 (I)
They declined opening an account because they were worried you would not be able to pay the 5 eurie monthly fee??
They declined opening an account because they were worried you would not be able to pay the 5 eurie monthly fee??
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 41 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,843
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
They reasoning was an ATM which was offline might still give out a small amount of money which I might put my account in negative and I never pay them back.
They reasoning was an ATM which was offline might still give out a small amount of money which I might put my account in negative and I never pay them back.