Notice: Welcome to Minichan, an account has automatically been created and assigned to you, you don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password. Alternatively, you can restore your ID.

Minichan

Topic: I'm finding some of the excuses in the Gisèle Pelicot rape case to be less than convincing.

Anonymous A started this discussion 8 months ago #121,125

Some of these jackasses are claiming that scratching yourself in your sleep means you're aware and consenting to copulation. I find that a shaky premise.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyek8pgy7po

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 8 months ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,324,825

Is it shocking that so many men participated or is it shocking that so few men participated?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 8 months ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,324,844

> Many of the men have admitted wrongdoing and, like Vincent C, even apologised to Gisèle Pelicot in the courtroom, but they have also insisted that since they didn’t intend to rape, they should not be found guilty of it.

French penal code says that there is no offence without the intent to commit it; I think that they'll be found liable for "infractions-non intentionnelles" because it will be argued that they were reckless or negligent when committing the act.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 8 months ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,324,973

@1,324,825 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Maybe I am old fashioned but I think being raped by fifty men is a lot.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 months ago, 1 week later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,326,393

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Just your average gang-bang today

Anonymous E double-posted this 6 months ago, 1 month later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,331,998

Sacred Deux!

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,332,015

@1,324,825 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> Is it shocking that so many men participated or is it shocking that so few men participated?

If she were attractive the number would have been in the tens of thousands. While the experience was no doubt traumatic for her she's lucky she's ugly and I think the judge will bear that in mind when sentencing her husband. I don't think he'll get the 20 years the prosecution are asking for.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 months ago, 1 day later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,332,273

@previous (F)
What a weird thing to think

boof joined in and replied with this 6 months ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,332,294

so like, how did the lady figure out that she was getting whored out in her sleeep

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 months ago, 22 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,332,305

@previous (boof)
They caught the get filming upskirt videos in a grocery store, and footage of the rapes were on his phone as well. I think he had also been doing weird stuff with his daughter

boof replied with this 6 months ago, 6 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,332,307

dang

Anonymous F replied with this 5 months ago, 1 week later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,210

@1,332,273 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> What a weird thing to think

There's nothing weird about acknowledging that if that woman had been hot the number of guys who'd taken advantage of the offer her husband was making would be exponentially higher than it was. Ugliness does not have many upsides but that woman inadvertently discovered one of them.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 months ago, 20 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,334,214

@previous (F)
It's weird you think it'll change his sentencing. You seem like a coomer

Anonymous F replied with this 5 months ago, 1 week later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,335,776

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> It's weird you think it'll change his sentencing.

The men were given more lenient sentences than the prosecution were asking for. Just as I told you would happen.

https://www.france24.com/en/video/20241219-pelicot-children-women-s-rights-groups-slam-too-lenient-sentences-for-co-defendants

If that woman was hot instead of looking like a sack of potatoes the judge would have given them the maximum penalty.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 5 months ago, 3 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,335,784

@previous (F)
What a dumb thing to infer

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 5 months ago, 1 day later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,336,043

FUCK YOU

Anonymous F replied with this 4 months ago, 3 weeks later, 3 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,340,666

@1,335,784 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> What a dumb thing to infer

The judge literally said in his sentencing that he wasn't imposing the maximum sentence because "if you're honest with yourself they probably did you a favor".

Erik !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 1 hour later, 3 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,340,671

@1,324,973 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Virtue signalling again

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 4 months ago, 53 minutes later, 3 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,340,675

@1,340,666 (F)
Source?

Anonymous F replied with this 4 months ago, 2 weeks later, 3 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,344,796

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
40 minutes into this documentary on the case:

https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/provence-alpes-cote-d-azur/bouches-du-rhone/marseille/gisele-pelicot-et-la-soumission-chimique-un-documentaire-exceptionnel-en-janvier-sur-france-televisions-l-arme-secrete-des-violeurs-3083809.html

Anonymous F double-posted this 3 months ago, 1 month later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,651

That shut her up.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,653

@previous (F)
Get a life you creep

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 12 hours later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,790

@1,340,666 (F)
@1,344,796 (F)
dam lol

Anonymous J double-posted this 3 months ago, 30 seconds later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,791

@1,351,653 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
fembois first

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 9 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,793

@previous (J)
What

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 months ago, 4 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,797

@1,332,273 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Not just weird. Horrible.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 months ago, 42 minutes later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,805

@previous (K)
Yes

boof replied with this 3 months ago, 2 hours later, 4 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,351,820

Good news, US government has rescued these men from France and restored their freedom

Anonymous F replied with this 2 months ago, 2 weeks later, 5 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,355,650

@1,351,653 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> demands proof
> gets given proof
> resorts to insults and emotional outbursts

> claims not to feel like a woman

Anonymous F double-posted this 2 months ago, 1 week later, 5 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,357,580

That shut her up again.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 34 minutes later, 5 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,357,588

If it were any other country, I would ask how could this happen. But it’s France so it make sense somehow.
:

You are required to fill in a captcha for your first 5 posts. That's only 5 more! We apologize, but this helps stop spam.

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.