Minichan

Topic: Have you ever looked into the Catholic "incorruptibles"?

Dana started this discussion 1 year ago #120,942

These are the corpses of Catholic saints that apparently do not decompose like normal humans. I was interested, so I did some research. I was disappointed, but not surprised, to find out that most of them are skeletons underneath wax effigies, and the others are clearly mummified.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later[^] [v] #1,323,014

Knock it off Matt

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 33 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,015

They appear wax-like but except for a very few counterfeits are genuinely just the bodies.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,016

Occasionally humans get (lucky I guess?? I dunno, it's still a dead corpse) better treatment in death and they don't go straight to worm food. You can bet if we all got mausoleums there would be a lot more bodies that aren't 100% skeletons.

My favorite part is when they get all superstitious and start parting out the dead for relics :D.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,045

corpse wax is the answer. shits fucking obnoxious and in the right conditions enough of it can form on a body to render it immune to further decay.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,046

Catholic saints were pedophiles just like most current priests.

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,047

@previous (F)
even after correcting for the population differences between priests and the general public, teachers are waaaayyyyyyyy more likely to rape a kid than a priest.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,049

@previous (E)
Teachers get caught and prosecuted. The church protects priests and always covers up the crimes they do.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,051

@previous (F)

> Teachers get caught and prosecuted. The church protects priests and always covers up the crimes they do.

Citation needed.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,052

@previous (G)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases
More reading than you have time for.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 27 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,057

@1,323,051 (G)
The Catholic church will send molester priests to new towns so that they have a fresh set of victims available

(Edited 23 seconds later.)

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,059

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
And even send them to a country where they cannot be extradited for prosecution.

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,060

@1,323,049 (F)
if a teacher gets caught more often than the priests then why is the teacher fucking minors more often?

by repeating this lie as if it were truth you are enabling pedophilia by giving the far more numerous group(percentage wise) some measure of cover by shifting the blame onto the priests.

(Edited 41 seconds later.)

Dana (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,070

@1,323,045 (E)
It's not even corpse wax. It's just a wax effigy intentionally sculpted by a human artist. I am talking about the ones who look still living, which is most of them. The ones that are not effigies over bones are obviously mummified like, say, an Egyptian mummy.

Dana (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 13 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,072

Here's an example: Padre Pio. It's not his real face. His skull is in there, but the face you see is a wax sculpture.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,075

@previous (Dana)
Its very lifelike

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 36 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,076

@1,323,060 (E)
Why are you taking the side of pedophile priests?

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,078

@previous (F)
theyd have to exist first

Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,079

@previous (E)

> theyd have to exist first

You're dumb as all fuck. Even the current Pope says they exist and apologizes for them - Not that he has done a thing to stop them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases
The prior Pope admits to covering up the pedophilia
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/24/former-pope-benedict-statement-child-sexual-abuse-inquiry
Former pope Benedict admits making false claim to child sexual abuse inquiry

Ex-pontiff blames editorial ‘oversight’ for previous statement he was absent from 1980 meeting over suspected paedophile priest

Dana (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 27 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,080

@1,323,075 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It is, but it's not him. It's a wax sculpture.

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,081

@1,323,079 (F)
thanks for proving my earliest claim, dumbfuck

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 28 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,082

@1,323,080 (Dana)
Oh I understood. I'm just marveling at the craftsmanship

Is that little girl one wax as well?

Dana (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 41 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,083

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The one whose eyes allegedly open but it's really a trick of the light? No, she is embalmed in a carefully controlled environment.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 43 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,085

@previous (Dana)

She isn't embalmed, she is incorruptible.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 17 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,086

@1,323,083 (Dana)
I think so. She has a bow in her hair?

Dana (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,323,089

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yes, that one.

@1,323,085 (C)
We know that she is carefully embalmed.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.