Topic: "There's no state where it's legal to kill a baby after it's born"
Anonymous A started this discussion 9 months ago #120,684
A fact-check said by someone who believes women should be excused for killing newborn infants because of post-partum depression, as if these same mothers didn't have the option to put the kid up for adoption.
You can just drop a baby off at a hospital, no questions asked. Yet liberals will defend the murder of these born children. Shame.
You can just drop a baby off at a hospital, no questions asked. Yet liberals will defend the murder of these born children. Shame.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,320,778
It's called post-partum abortion and it's my child, my choice.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,779
She was telling the truth
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,782
@OPenis
Please cite the law from any of the 50 states that says that "it is legal to kill a baby after it's born."
Please cite the law from any of the 50 states that says that "it is legal to kill a baby after it's born."
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 8 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,787
@1,320,779 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
If it's technically illegal, but the mother is not prosecuted, then in practice it is legal.
Same for perjury. The law makes falsely reporting a crime itself a crime. When women are caught trying to destroy a man's entire life (NOT just lacking evidence, but proven to be lying) they are given a pass. The reasoning given is that this would discourage real rape victims, a nonsensical justification because real rape victims wont be caught lying, at worst they can't back up their accusation.
Harris said Roe v. Wade didn't allow third trimester abortions during the debate. That is also a lie. Nine states allowed abortions through the third trimester.
Why should someone vote for Harris when all 9 states have publicly available laws on the books anyone can verify, and see that she is lying? A 9 month old fetus is barely distinguishable from a born baby, and will survive if taken out of the womb.
If it's technically illegal, but the mother is not prosecuted, then in practice it is legal.
Same for perjury. The law makes falsely reporting a crime itself a crime. When women are caught trying to destroy a man's entire life (NOT just lacking evidence, but proven to be lying) they are given a pass. The reasoning given is that this would discourage real rape victims, a nonsensical justification because real rape victims wont be caught lying, at worst they can't back up their accusation.
Harris said Roe v. Wade didn't allow third trimester abortions during the debate. That is also a lie. Nine states allowed abortions through the third trimester.
Why should someone vote for Harris when all 9 states have publicly available laws on the books anyone can verify, and see that she is lying? A 9 month old fetus is barely distinguishable from a born baby, and will survive if taken out of the womb.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,788
@previous (A)
If it survives when it's taken out of the womb, it isn't an abortion
It isn't a hard concept understand. Are you stupid?
If it survives when it's taken out of the womb, it isn't an abortion
It isn't a hard concept understand. Are you stupid?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 19 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,789
@1,320,782 (D)
I can cite the laws allowing abortions through the third trimester, which Harris lied about during the debate. Wikipedia
The states letting babies be murdered after birth do not write it down in the law books. They simply refuse to prosecute when it happens.
This isn't a gotcha. Weed is illegal in the Netherlands, and Pedophilia is illegal in Thailand. We both know that what's on the books is not a reflection of the actual law as it's enforced.
I can cite the laws allowing abortions through the third trimester, which Harris lied about during the debate. Wikipedia
The states letting babies be murdered after birth do not write it down in the law books. They simply refuse to prosecute when it happens.
This isn't a gotcha. Weed is illegal in the Netherlands, and Pedophilia is illegal in Thailand. We both know that what's on the books is not a reflection of the actual law as it's enforced.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 59 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,791
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,794
@1,320,788 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
If they kill it while it's in the womb before pulling it out, how is that any better?
Playing semantics misses the point. "Terminating" a human at that stage in it's development is wrong, no matter what you call it.
If they kill it while it's in the womb before pulling it out, how is that any better?
Playing semantics misses the point. "Terminating" a human at that stage in it's development is wrong, no matter what you call it.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 35 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,795
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 5 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,796
@1,320,791 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Once again, you repeat lies, get called out WITH SOURCES and then resort to name-calling. This is how you act in every thread. Why do you even bother joining the discussion if you revert back to juvenile behavior?
Once again, you repeat lies, get called out WITH SOURCES and then resort to name-calling. This is how you act in every thread. Why do you even bother joining the discussion if you revert back to juvenile behavior?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 months ago, 39 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,797
@1,320,795 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Then why do 9 states have laws on the books that make it legal to abort an 8 or 9 month old fetus?
Why legalize something that isn't happening, and is bad?
Then why do 9 states have laws on the books that make it legal to abort an 8 or 9 month old fetus?
Why legalize something that isn't happening, and is bad?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 46 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,798
@1,320,796 (A)
If the baby is living in the womb at nine months and they remove it. It's removed ALIVE, ans is an emergency c section, not an abortion
You clearly don't have an understanding of what procedures fall under the abortion umbrella
If the baby is living in the womb at nine months and they remove it. It's removed ALIVE, ans is an emergency c section, not an abortion
You clearly don't have an understanding of what procedures fall under the abortion umbrella
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 9 months ago, 47 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,800
@1,320,797 (A)
Because when a fetus DIES in the womb, it's an abortion to remove it. You fucking mong
Because when a fetus DIES in the womb, it's an abortion to remove it. You fucking mong
(Edited 6 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,801
@1,320,798 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Can you provide a source that says terminating it is illegal in any of the 9 states listed in the article?
If not, you're making it up. The law clearly states that abortion at any stage of pregnancy is legal in those states.
Even if what you are saying now about "removing" it and seeing what happens, Harris lied when she said third trimester abortions aren't legal. Many states, including her running mate's state have explicitly allowed in.
Can you provide a source that says terminating it is illegal in any of the 9 states listed in the article?
If not, you're making it up. The law clearly states that abortion at any stage of pregnancy is legal in those states.
Even if what you are saying now about "removing" it and seeing what happens, Harris lied when she said third trimester abortions aren't legal. Many states, including her running mate's state have explicitly allowed in.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,803
@previous (A)
I dont need proof that it's illegal. You nerd proof that it's legal. You're a fucking idiot
I dont need proof that it's illegal. You nerd proof that it's legal. You're a fucking idiot
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 28 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,805
@1,320,800 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Bold of you to admit it can be alive or dead inside the mother.
What do you think happens when a woman, 8 months pregnant and fetus alive, goes to an abortionist in one of those states?
Do you think they turn her away, or just pull out the baby prematurely? They don't. They take her in, and she comes out without any living children.
Bold of you to admit it can be alive or dead inside the mother.
What do you think happens when a woman, 8 months pregnant and fetus alive, goes to an abortionist in one of those states?
Do you think they turn her away, or just pull out the baby prematurely? They don't. They take her in, and she comes out without any living children.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 15 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,806
Do some basic fucking research before you start yapping that dick sucker you call a mouth
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 2 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,807
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 months ago, 17 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,808
@1,320,806 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I did research, and cited it. You ignored that several times and keep asking for a source.
I did research, and cited it. You ignored that several times and keep asking for a source.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 20 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,809
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 53 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,811
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Considering that the democrats say it's not even alive, yes, very bold.
Still pretending I didn't give a source? Ignore information that's inconvenient, that's what your leader does.
Considering that the democrats say it's not even alive, yes, very bold.
Still pretending I didn't give a source? Ignore information that's inconvenient, that's what your leader does.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 2 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,817
@previous (A)
You didn't show a source that it's legal in any state to kill a baby after its born. You dont understand simple concepts and you look stupid
You didn't show a source that it's legal in any state to kill a baby after its born. You dont understand simple concepts and you look stupid
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,821
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You didn't show a source that it's legal in any state to kill a baby after its born.
I said twice that wasn't on the books, and that it's not prosecuted.
Again you are lying about the position I took (a strawman) because you can't have a discussion in good faith.
You and Harris both lied about third trimester abortions and I DID give a source for that.
> You didn't show a source that it's legal in any state to kill a baby after its born.
I said twice that wasn't on the books, and that it's not prosecuted.
Again you are lying about the position I took (a strawman) because you can't have a discussion in good faith.
You and Harris both lied about third trimester abortions and I DID give a source for that.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 43 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,822
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 2 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,824
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
In practice, it does.
Does anyone have to worry about being caught with weed in Holland? Does a pedophile need to worry about local police in Thailand?
Acknowledging the reality of enforcement is necessary to understand what is actually punished.
In practice, it does.
Does anyone have to worry about being caught with weed in Holland? Does a pedophile need to worry about local police in Thailand?
Acknowledging the reality of enforcement is necessary to understand what is actually punished.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 months ago, 41 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,825
@1,320,822 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The fact that post-partum abortion remains illegal but is not enforced suggests that the law is falling into desuetude.
The fact that post-partum abortion remains illegal but is not enforced suggests that the law is falling into desuetude.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,829
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 second later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,830
@1,320,825 (B)
A situation that a presidential candidate has every right to acknowledge, and propose solutions to.
Unfortunately one candidate is refusing to acknowledge the problem, and even telling explicit lies on stage about abortions laws.
The moderators were referring to abortion as a "right", clearly showing bias, because this debate is between two candidates who disagree about whether it's a crime or a right.
Is it any surprise a biased moderator wouldn't fact-check Harris, and cite the laws that do make third trimester abortion legal?
A situation that a presidential candidate has every right to acknowledge, and propose solutions to.
Unfortunately one candidate is refusing to acknowledge the problem, and even telling explicit lies on stage about abortions laws.
The moderators were referring to abortion as a "right", clearly showing bias, because this debate is between two candidates who disagree about whether it's a crime or a right.
Is it any surprise a biased moderator wouldn't fact-check Harris, and cite the laws that do make third trimester abortion legal?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 33 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,831
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,835
@1,320,829 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I gave you a source for the laws that Harris lied about.
Saying "do your research" over and over without engaging with what I'm saying is exactly how anti-vaxxers I've met act. They can't cite research themselves, and they don't care about the medical research or laws on the books that contradict them.
If you have to ignore my source, lie about my position, and name-call each time you can't refute my statements those are all signs you are in the wrong.
I gave you a source for the laws that Harris lied about.
Saying "do your research" over and over without engaging with what I'm saying is exactly how anti-vaxxers I've met act. They can't cite research themselves, and they don't care about the medical research or laws on the books that contradict them.
If you have to ignore my source, lie about my position, and name-call each time you can't refute my statements those are all signs you are in the wrong.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 47 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,836
People like op would crack my shit up if they didn't make up nearly half of the voting population. Terrifying. God I want to go back to when people like this were just weirdos that everyone pointed and laughed at, like flat earthers. Instead anything they believe is an "opinion" and is for some reason treated as just as valid as any other. Madness.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 39 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,837
@1,320,835 (A)
Literally look up why late term abortions happen. You could look this up and you won't. You knew you didn't know what you were talking about regarding this issue, and decided to lecture us any way
Literally look up why late term abortions happen. You could look this up and you won't. You knew you didn't know what you were talking about regarding this issue, and decided to lecture us any way
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 9 months ago, 38 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,839
@1,320,836 (E)
He won't bother doing a google search and reading four paragraphs. He's fucking trash
He won't bother doing a google search and reading four paragraphs. He's fucking trash
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,841
@1,320,836 (E)
> People like op would crack my shit up if they didn't make up nearly half of the voting population.
People that care when a presidential candidate lie on stage?
This is the world you live in, if you lie, many people will care.
> Instead anything they believe is an "opinion" and is for some reason treated as just as valid as any other. Madness.
I didn't give an opinion, I cited laws.
Kook can't cite anything, because she thinks her opinion matters more than the verifiable laws written in the public record.
I guess your truth is that any sources that contradict you don't count? You act like the law is an opinion, and it's not.
> People like op would crack my shit up if they didn't make up nearly half of the voting population.
People that care when a presidential candidate lie on stage?
This is the world you live in, if you lie, many people will care.
> Instead anything they believe is an "opinion" and is for some reason treated as just as valid as any other. Madness.
I didn't give an opinion, I cited laws.
Kook can't cite anything, because she thinks her opinion matters more than the verifiable laws written in the public record.
I guess your truth is that any sources that contradict you don't count? You act like the law is an opinion, and it's not.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,842
@1,320,839 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I gave a source, and you didn't.
I've got google open, so please tell me what law makes third-trimester abortion illegal in the 9 states mentioned.
You can't, you're vaguely referring to some law that doesn't exist.
I didn't ask you to defend my point for me, I gave a link. That's the difference between us.
I gave a source, and you didn't.
I've got google open, so please tell me what law makes third-trimester abortion illegal in the 9 states mentioned.
You can't, you're vaguely referring to some law that doesn't exist.
I didn't ask you to defend my point for me, I gave a link. That's the difference between us.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 9 months ago, 2 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,843
@1,320,837 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Literally look up why late term abortions happen.
Not every case is the same. I'm sure some of them are understandable.
That doesn't excuse lying on stage. Harris could have acknowledged the law and said it was justified because the mother's life was at risk or anything else.
Instead she made a choice to lie.
> You could look this up and you won't. You knew you didn't know what you were talking about regarding this issue, and decided to lecture us any way
It's not my job to look up a source that defends your position.
I did my research and found laws legalizing 3rd trimester abortion.
Neither you nor I could find anything saying it was illegal. If you did find this, you'd paste the link yourself, you wouldn't ask me to do your work for you.
> Literally look up why late term abortions happen.
Not every case is the same. I'm sure some of them are understandable.
That doesn't excuse lying on stage. Harris could have acknowledged the law and said it was justified because the mother's life was at risk or anything else.
Instead she made a choice to lie.
> You could look this up and you won't. You knew you didn't know what you were talking about regarding this issue, and decided to lecture us any way
It's not my job to look up a source that defends your position.
I did my research and found laws legalizing 3rd trimester abortion.
Neither you nor I could find anything saying it was illegal. If you did find this, you'd paste the link yourself, you wouldn't ask me to do your work for you.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 13 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,845
@previous (A)
Most are understandable. Women have no reason to what 9 months to get an abortion. Women wait 9 months when they want a baby!
And you didn't find any states where it's legal to kill a baby after it's born
Most are understandable. Women have no reason to what 9 months to get an abortion. Women wait 9 months when they want a baby!
And you didn't find any states where it's legal to kill a baby after it's born
(Edited 5 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 47 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,846
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'd have more respect for Harris if she said that instead of lying about the law.
> And you didn't find any states where it's legal to kill a baby after it's born
We've been over this three times, you are making a strawman, and I'm not repeating this a 4th time.
If you need to lie about the position someone took, you have a problem.
I'd have more respect for Harris if she said that instead of lying about the law.
> And you didn't find any states where it's legal to kill a baby after it's born
We've been over this three times, you are making a strawman, and I'm not repeating this a 4th time.
If you need to lie about the position someone took, you have a problem.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,847
@previous (A)
It's not a lie. Trump kept saying that they would abort 9 month old babies, put them on a table, and figure out what to do with them. He was implying that they were killing 9 month old babies
That isn't what happens
It's not a lie. Trump kept saying that they would abort 9 month old babies, put them on a table, and figure out what to do with them. He was implying that they were killing 9 month old babies
That isn't what happens
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,848
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm not referring to that, I'm referring to a part in the debate where he said Roe v. Wade allowed third trimester abortions and Harris shook her head and said it didn't.
Third trimester abortions were and are allowed in 9 states.
I'm not referring to that, I'm referring to a part in the debate where he said Roe v. Wade allowed third trimester abortions and Harris shook her head and said it didn't.
Third trimester abortions were and are allowed in 9 states.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,850
@previous (A)
And I'm referring to how you started this topic
And third trimester abortions should be free and legal so that women don't septic from a fetus rotting inside of them
And I'm referring to how you started this topic
And third trimester abortions should be free and legal so that women don't septic from a fetus rotting inside of them
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,851
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> And I'm referring to how you started this topic
I've said multiple times that after birth, there is no law legalizing it. Stop trying to twist my words.
> And third trimester abortions should be free and legal so that women don't septic from a fetus rotting inside of them
It is legal in many states, despite the lie Harris told on stage.
> And I'm referring to how you started this topic
I've said multiple times that after birth, there is no law legalizing it. Stop trying to twist my words.
> And third trimester abortions should be free and legal so that women don't septic from a fetus rotting inside of them
It is legal in many states, despite the lie Harris told on stage.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 months ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,852
Here's an article about a a video of Planned Parenthood executives talking about their procedures. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/3115477/planned-parenthood-sting-video-suppressed-by-harris-released/
Harris suppressed the video.
It's disgusting, but it's important to know what's going on. There's a reason censorship is promoted and used by the Democrats so often, they know that an open discussion of the evidence collected would turn public opinion against them.
When the "impartial moderators" state that abortion is a right, and refuse to ask the candidates about leaks like this, is it any wonder Trump doesn't want to come back to a debate like that? It's not their job to take his side either, but they should be neutral.
Harris suppressed the video.
It's disgusting, but it's important to know what's going on. There's a reason censorship is promoted and used by the Democrats so often, they know that an open discussion of the evidence collected would turn public opinion against them.
When the "impartial moderators" state that abortion is a right, and refuse to ask the candidates about leaks like this, is it any wonder Trump doesn't want to come back to a debate like that? It's not their job to take his side either, but they should be neutral.
Anonymous E replied with this 9 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,853
@previous (A)
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-planned-parenthood/
Do not rely on the Washington Examiner for reliable information.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-planned-parenthood/
Do not rely on the Washington Examiner for reliable information.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,854
Anonymous E replied with this 9 months ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,856
@1,320,787 (A)
> Harris said Roe v. Wade didn't allow third trimester abortions during the debate. That is also a lie. Nine states allowed abortions through the third trimester.
There is an important asterisk here you're leaving out. Roe v Wade ONLY allowed for such late abortions when it was necessary for life of the mother. This is NOT what Trump and the MAGA republicans are saying. At best they are lying by omission in order to convince people like you that anyone in their third trimester can walk into clinic and abort no questions asked. This does not happen.
> Harris said Roe v. Wade didn't allow third trimester abortions during the debate. That is also a lie. Nine states allowed abortions through the third trimester.
There is an important asterisk here you're leaving out. Roe v Wade ONLY allowed for such late abortions when it was necessary for life of the mother. This is NOT what Trump and the MAGA republicans are saying. At best they are lying by omission in order to convince people like you that anyone in their third trimester can walk into clinic and abort no questions asked. This does not happen.
Anonymous E double-posted this 9 months ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,857
@1,320,854 (A)
Snopes has an entire sources section at the bottom of the article. Don't take the article's word for it, check out the sources.
Snopes has an entire sources section at the bottom of the article. Don't take the article's word for it, check out the sources.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,859
@1,320,800 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Because when a fetus DIES in the womb, it's an abortion to remove it. You fucking mong
That's called a miscarriage and has always, of course, been legal throughout history everywhere. An abortion is the deliberate killing and removal of a fetus which may or may not be viable.
> Because when a fetus DIES in the womb, it's an abortion to remove it. You fucking mong
That's called a miscarriage and has always, of course, been legal throughout history everywhere. An abortion is the deliberate killing and removal of a fetus which may or may not be viable.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,862
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 9 months ago, 28 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,863
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 9 months ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,867
@1,320,859 (F)
I'm sorry Im being so aggressive and I'll try to be better about explaining it kindly
A miscarriage is the spontaneous expulsion of the fetus. It happens without outside intervention
I'm sorry Im being so aggressive and I'll try to be better about explaining it kindly
A miscarriage is the spontaneous expulsion of the fetus. It happens without outside intervention
Anonymous F replied with this 9 months ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,869
@1,320,862 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You're completely wrong and you look stupid
Um, you are completely wrong and also astonishingly arrogant.
How can you not know the difference between stillbirths (miscarriages in the third trimester) or, if you insist, "spontaneous abortions" ... and abortions? The former is natural and occurs all the time. The latter is a deliberate act, the intention of which is to terminate the pregnancy.
> and you look stupid
You are so quick to call others stupid when you have such a poor grasp on facts and reality. This makes you look incredibly foolish.
> You're completely wrong and you look stupid
Um, you are completely wrong and also astonishingly arrogant.
How can you not know the difference between stillbirths (miscarriages in the third trimester) or, if you insist, "spontaneous abortions" ... and abortions? The former is natural and occurs all the time. The latter is a deliberate act, the intention of which is to terminate the pregnancy.
> and you look stupid
You are so quick to call others stupid when you have such a poor grasp on facts and reality. This makes you look incredibly foolish.
Anonymous F double-posted this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,870
@1,320,867 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I'm sorry Im being so aggressive
Thank you.
> A miscarriage is the spontaneous expulsion of the fetus. It happens without outside intervention
Yes, that's what I said.
> I'm sorry Im being so aggressive
Thank you.
> A miscarriage is the spontaneous expulsion of the fetus. It happens without outside intervention
Yes, that's what I said.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,873
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 9 months ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,874
@1,320,870 (F)
I'm pretty I know what you're not understanding but I just need confirmation before I proceed
I'm pretty I know what you're not understanding but I just need confirmation before I proceed
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,877
How do you say I dont know how pregnancy works for 100 alex
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,878
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,879
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,880
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You'll post 50 times to teach, but won't back up your statements with any sources.
I gave you a source showing that 3rd trimester abortions were legal in 9 states, now you show any source contradicting that.
You'll post 50 times to teach, but won't back up your statements with any sources.
I gave you a source showing that 3rd trimester abortions were legal in 9 states, now you show any source contradicting that.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 23 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,881
@previous (A)
You started this topic with dishonesty and have also proven that you and sad amount of other people don't understand simple concepts about a topic that's easy to research
I DONT disagree that some states allow third trimester abortions, because I ACTUALLY understand that it doesn't involve killing healthy babies. So I am in favor of them being legal
Hope that helps
You started this topic with dishonesty and have also proven that you and sad amount of other people don't understand simple concepts about a topic that's easy to research
I DONT disagree that some states allow third trimester abortions, because I ACTUALLY understand that it doesn't involve killing healthy babies. So I am in favor of them being legal
Hope that helps
boof joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,882
I think you can only kill the infant in self defence.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,884
@1,320,881 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I DONT disagree that some states allow third trimester abortions
Finally.
It took you a long time to admit it, and Harris still refuses to acknowledge this.
I was never dishonest, and you never showed one source to show I was wrong about anything. Harris did lie, and yet you will be backing that dishonest politician.
> I DONT disagree that some states allow third trimester abortions
Finally.
It took you a long time to admit it, and Harris still refuses to acknowledge this.
I was never dishonest, and you never showed one source to show I was wrong about anything. Harris did lie, and yet you will be backing that dishonest politician.
boof replied with this 9 months ago, 44 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,889
Anonymous D replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,890
boof replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,892
Gone with the Wind, the story of southern belle who's pussy lips done gone flew away
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,922
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 4 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,938
@OP
Republican's are totally OK with the born baby starving to death because the mother is unable to care for it - Cannot afford health care so the baby dies from some fixable problem.
That is Post Abortion death which Republicans allow.
Republican's are totally OK with the born baby starving to death because the mother is unable to care for it - Cannot afford health care so the baby dies from some fixable problem.
That is Post Abortion death which Republicans allow.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,940
Anonymous B replied with this 9 months ago, 2 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,950
Post-Partum abortions are rampant in the USA. Almost 6% of new American mothers abort post-fetus in the fourth trimester.
Anonymous K replied with this 9 months ago, 7 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,956
@previous (B)
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/trump-made-false-claims-late-term-abortion-debate-rcna159460
Trump made false claims about 'late-term abortion' during the debate, experts say
On Thursday, Trump repeated claims he made in 2016 regarding late-in-pregnancy abortions during a debate against then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
He claimed: “They will take the life of a child in the eighth month, the ninth month and even after birth.”
By definition, late-in-pregnancy abortions take place at or after 21 weeks of pregnancy. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
less than 1% of all abortions occur at this stage of pregnancy.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/trump-made-false-claims-late-term-abortion-debate-rcna159460
Trump made false claims about 'late-term abortion' during the debate, experts say
On Thursday, Trump repeated claims he made in 2016 regarding late-in-pregnancy abortions during a debate against then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
He claimed: “They will take the life of a child in the eighth month, the ninth month and even after birth.”
By definition, late-in-pregnancy abortions take place at or after 21 weeks of pregnancy. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
less than 1% of all abortions occur at this stage of pregnancy.
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 9 months ago, 50 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,971
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 20 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,978
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,993
@1,320,922 (J)
I gave my source.
@1,320,940 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You were but you won't admit it
Then quote me.
> You're not an curious person, it's obvious
It's not my job to make your argument for you.
I gave my source.
@1,320,940 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You were but you won't admit it
Then quote me.
> You're not an curious person, it's obvious
It's not my job to make your argument for you.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 9 months ago, 14 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,995
@previous (A)
It's all through your post
You made your own argument and ended up looking stupid. Why are so many of you clueless about this topic?
It's all through your post
You made your own argument and ended up looking stupid. Why are so many of you clueless about this topic?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 44 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,999
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> It's all through your post
You keep saying that and can't quote me. That speaks for itself.
> Why are so many of you clueless about this topic?
When you make a strawman, you can make it say whatever you want.
> It's all through your post
You keep saying that and can't quote me. That speaks for itself.
> Why are so many of you clueless about this topic?
When you make a strawman, you can make it say whatever you want.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 21 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,002
Anonymous L double-posted this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,003
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 15 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,004
Anonymous L replied with this 9 months ago, 54 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,007
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 22 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,008
When I see Americans arguing about abortion online, it makes me grateful that I'm not American. Much the same as how their arguments about guns make me feel.
This is your problem, and I'm happy to leave you to it. Well, you and lots of thrid-world or highly religious countries.
This is your problem, and I'm happy to leave you to it. Well, you and lots of thrid-world or highly religious countries.
Anonymous B replied with this 9 months ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,009
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,013
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 9 months ago, 50 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,014
@1,321,008 (M)
Many countries ban abortion, and the democrats idolize those countries and want to import them into the country.
The one upside to a democratic agenda is importing people with family values.
Many countries ban abortion, and the democrats idolize those countries and want to import them into the country.
The one upside to a democratic agenda is importing people with family values.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 9 months ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,037
abortion is basically human sacrifice, except in the case of blacks, in which case its pest control.
boof replied with this 9 months ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,045
@1,321,014 (A)
your logic failed -- often people want to leave countries like that to get more freedoms. if they loved not having freedoms, they wouldn't follow someone's wish to get imported, that's retarded
your logic failed -- often people want to leave countries like that to get more freedoms. if they loved not having freedoms, they wouldn't follow someone's wish to get imported, that's retarded
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 19 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,186
Anonymous N replied with this 9 months ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,237
@previous (A)
Migrants are not coming to America for jobs, they're coming for uncle sames new age homestead act.
Migrants are not coming to America for jobs, they're coming for uncle sames new age homestead act.
Anonymous D replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,238
@previous (N)
Wrong. They are coming for Chinese sewer oil brides.
Wrong. They are coming for Chinese sewer oil brides.
(Edited 14 hours later by a moderator.)
Anonymous L replied with this 9 months ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,239
Anonymous D replied with this 9 months ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,240
@previous (L)
The bitch needs to go back to Kunming if she wants someone to make a cat for dinner.
The bitch needs to go back to Kunming if she wants someone to make a cat for dinner.
(Edited 14 hours later by a moderator.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,242
@1,321,239 (L)
If he was a rapist they would have convicted him for it.
A man who is caught on a candid recording implying it matters whether they let you do it doesn't sound like a rapist.
If he was a rapist they would have convicted him for it.
A man who is caught on a candid recording implying it matters whether they let you do it doesn't sound like a rapist.
Anonymous L replied with this 9 months ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,245
@previous (A)
Found liable by a civil court of digitally raping a woman. You will vote for him because you believe rape and sexual abuse is acceptable. End of story.
Found liable by a civil court of digitally raping a woman. You will vote for him because you believe rape and sexual abuse is acceptable. End of story.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 months ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,248
Anonymous L replied with this 9 months ago, 51 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,264
@previous (A)
You know he's rapist. You admire him for that. You'll vote for him because he's a rapist. If he wins, you'll revel in the fact that a rapist and serial sex abuser is (again) the most powerful man on the planet. You aren't alone. Many of his followers agree with you, equating rape with dominance and power.
You know he's rapist. You admire him for that. You'll vote for him because he's a rapist. If he wins, you'll revel in the fact that a rapist and serial sex abuser is (again) the most powerful man on the planet. You aren't alone. Many of his followers agree with you, equating rape with dominance and power.
boof replied with this 9 months ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,274
@1,321,186 (A)
depends on the immigrant. some are refugees, for instance, seeking refuge. anyway why the fuck call them migrants? migration is when they fly north and south with the seasons.
depends on the immigrant. some are refugees, for instance, seeking refuge. anyway why the fuck call them migrants? migration is when they fly north and south with the seasons.
Anonymous N replied with this 9 months ago, 35 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,289
@1,321,264 (L)no one of sound mind actually thinks that laddie, you really, really need to get laid. or at least have a wank.
Anonymous L replied with this 9 months ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,292
Anonymous N replied with this 9 months ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,297
Anonymous N double-posted this 9 months ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,321,298
however, its all moot, since trump will never be guilty of anything actionable outside the delusions of inceldom.