Topic: Damn. Trump was right about late abortions
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #120,657
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,320,551
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 15 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,552
Has Kamala's party figured out what a woman is yet?
!tr.t4dJfuU replied with this 1 month ago, 34 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,558
@previous (C)We know for a fact Trump does know the value of a woman.
"Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards accuser $5M"
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,561
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,563
@1,320,558 (!tr.t4dJfuU)
Put another way, Trump has never been convicted of rape or sexual abuse. A civil trial "found him liable" despite no evidence of wrongdoing, because some jurors wanted to be activists and just went with their gut feeling.
The value of a woman is entirely different than the definition of what a woman is. Democrats still don't understand how language or definitions work, and have been repeating the same meaningless circular definition for years because elementary English skills are too hard for them.
Put another way, Trump has never been convicted of rape or sexual abuse. A civil trial "found him liable" despite no evidence of wrongdoing, because some jurors wanted to be activists and just went with their gut feeling.
The value of a woman is entirely different than the definition of what a woman is. Democrats still don't understand how language or definitions work, and have been repeating the same meaningless circular definition for years because elementary English skills are too hard for them.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,567
@previous (C)
https://19thnews.org/2023/10/donald-trump-associates-sexual-misconduct-allegations/
Defend and deny: What we know about Trump and accusations of sexual misconduct
As Trump runs for president again, The 19th is examining allegations of sexual misconduct against him and others in his orbit.
Article goes on and on and on and on about Trump and Sexual assault - Starts OUT with Trump saying on an Open Mike about how he can just Grab Women by their Pussy. Brags about it.
https://19thnews.org/2023/10/donald-trump-associates-sexual-misconduct-allegations/
Defend and deny: What we know about Trump and accusations of sexual misconduct
As Trump runs for president again, The 19th is examining allegations of sexual misconduct against him and others in his orbit.
Article goes on and on and on and on about Trump and Sexual assault - Starts OUT with Trump saying on an Open Mike about how he can just Grab Women by their Pussy. Brags about it.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,568
@previous (B)
The defining feature that makes sexual assault an actual assault is that they don't let the attacker do it, but it happens anyway.
Many women do let celebrities do touch them, and if you let someone it's not assault.
The defining feature that makes sexual assault an actual assault is that they don't let the attacker do it, but it happens anyway.
Many women do let celebrities do touch them, and if you let someone it's not assault.
boof joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,569
@1,320,552 (C)
> Has Kamala's party figured out what a woman is yet?
ask yo mama
she showed me last night
> Has Kamala's party figured out what a woman is yet?
ask yo mama
she showed me last night
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 27 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,570
@1,320,563 (C)
non-circular definitions of words are an ideal to strive for, but in practice many words are defined in a circular fashion. why hone in on this one specific instance as if it has never happened before in language?
non-circular definitions of words are an ideal to strive for, but in practice many words are defined in a circular fashion. why hone in on this one specific instance as if it has never happened before in language?
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,572
@previous (F)
You can't define any word with itself, because the entire point of a definition is to explain the meaning of that word.
Can you name any other word that people insist can be defined with itself? I have only heard people try this with woman and man so that is the only instance that this would ever come up.
Obviously all word in dictionaries will end up circling around after a few lookups, but that's fine because you aren't supposed to learn a language from scratch reading a dictionary. You learn some words from experience, and then look up words that can't just have pointed out. The people trying to define woman as "someone who identifies as a woman" are not using words that eventually lead back after repeated lookups, they are using the word in it's own definition.
You can't define any word with itself, because the entire point of a definition is to explain the meaning of that word.
Can you name any other word that people insist can be defined with itself? I have only heard people try this with woman and man so that is the only instance that this would ever come up.
Obviously all word in dictionaries will end up circling around after a few lookups, but that's fine because you aren't supposed to learn a language from scratch reading a dictionary. You learn some words from experience, and then look up words that can't just have pointed out. The people trying to define woman as "someone who identifies as a woman" are not using words that eventually lead back after repeated lookups, they are using the word in it's own definition.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,593
@1,320,563 (C)
> Grab her by the pussy
They also think that somebody saying something is exactly equivalent to it actually happening physically, regardless of any context. There is no such thing as a joke or a metaphor either. Everything that is said is taken 100% literally and in all seriousness. This is because they are incapable of greater than one dimensional thought.
> Grab her by the pussy
They also think that somebody saying something is exactly equivalent to it actually happening physically, regardless of any context. There is no such thing as a joke or a metaphor either. Everything that is said is taken 100% literally and in all seriousness. This is because they are incapable of greater than one dimensional thought.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,595
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,320,604
@previous (F)
So you can't name a single word that is defined in terms of itself other than this, yet you still asked why I singled this word out.
So you can't name a single word that is defined in terms of itself other than this, yet you still asked why I singled this word out.