Minichan

Topic: Laser pointers and the LAW

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #12,056

In Utah it is a class C misdemeanor to point a laser pointer at a law enforcement officer and is an infraction to point a laser pointer at a moving vehicle.[53]
In Arizona it is a Class 1 misdemeanor if a person "aims a laser pointer at a police officer if the person intentionally or knowingly directs the beam of light from an operating laser pointer at another person and the person knows or reasonably should know that the other person is a police officer." (Arizona Revised Statutes §13-1213) [54]

If I lived there I would just walk up to cops and point it at them lol

cops are fags

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #217,081

Lasers more powerful than 5mw for personal use are also illegal in U.S., mainly because some people are actually dumb enough to point lasers into eyes.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #217,089

@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
It is already illegal to harm people. Thus it is not necessary to regulate laser power.

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #217,090

@previous (A)
You could say the same thing about all weapons, but I agree with you. They can be dangerous though, and you can accidentally hurt someone, or yourself, with a powerful enough laser. But that's why you're careful and wear special glasses for protection. I'm sick of the government babysitting me.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,103

@217,081 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
They are completely legal as long as they are purchased from a source within the US.

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,251

@previous (C)
Oh, so the U.S. just doesn't allow the importation of such lasers. I was under the impression that they were completely illegal because I haven't been able to find a good source within the U.S. Any suggestions?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,302

@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Oh, is your little brother going to tattle on you for something?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,314

@217,089 (A)

> It is already illegal to harm people. Thus is is not necessary to regulate firearms.
> It is already illegal to harm people. Thus is is not necessary to regulate anthrax.
> It is already illegal to harm people. Thus is is not necessary to regulate tanks.

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,316

@previous (E)
I agree. I would love a tank.

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,407

@217,314 (E)

> >It is already illegal to harm people. Thus is is not necessary to regulate firearms.
Firearms need the safety lock feature to prevent misfires.
> >It is already illegal to harm people. Thus is is not necessary to regulate anthrax.
Anthrax is a disease, not a form of self-defense.
> >It is already illegal to harm people. Thus is is not necessary to regulate tanks.
Tanks need to be regulated so they can withstand war.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,409

@previous (C)

> Firearms need the safety.

So do lazers.

> Anthrax is a disease, not a form of self-defense.

Lazers are weapons, not a toy.

> Tanks need to be regulated so they can withstand war.

Lazers need to be regulated so YOU WON'T BLIND YOUR LITTLE BROTHER ANY MORE

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,411

@previous (E)
> Lazers are weapons, not a toy.
What about baseball bats?
> Lazers need to be regulated so YOU WON'T BLIND YOUR LITTLE BROTHER ANY MORE
Shut the fuck up. And stop misspelling the word laser, you little cretin.

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,414

@previous (C)
Is your brother more or less easy to feel-up now that he is blind? I bet he doesn't run away like he used to!

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,565

@217,302 (D)
Hahaha, no, I'm not to4ster.

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 double-posted this 15 years ago, 31 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,566

@217,411 (C)
IMMA FIRIN MAH LAZOR!

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,573

@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Hilarious.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #217,677

@217,314 (E)
These are all true.

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #218,224

@previous (A)
Fucking fantastic. Thanks for the info.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #218,462

@previous (C)
It is my pleasure to educate people!
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.