Topic: If Ivanka wasn't my daughter, I'd be dating her. Yes, she is 13.
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #120,183
Totally not weird.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #1,315,659
Those European social democracies you jack off to don't have an age of consent groomer.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,661
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 11 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,664
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,666
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,667
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,668
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,669
@previous (A)
It does actually. You were trying to frame him as a pedophile. There's a big difference in paying this sort of compliment to your daughter when she's 13 (creepy) vs 25.
It does actually. You were trying to frame him as a pedophile. There's a big difference in paying this sort of compliment to your daughter when she's 13 (creepy) vs 25.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,670
@previous (C)
He is a pedo via the Epstein thing, but I digress. It's perfectly normal to want to date your fucking daughter. He's from New York, not fucking Alabama.
He is a pedo via the Epstein thing, but I digress. It's perfectly normal to want to date your fucking daughter. He's from New York, not fucking Alabama.
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 54 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,671
https://www.tmz.com/watch/0-7zm34rdu/
"I'm going to be dating her in ten years."
"I'm going to be dating her in ten years."
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,673
@1,315,670 (A)
> It's perfectly normal to want to date your fucking daughter. He's from New York, not fucking Alabama.
He didn't say he wanted to date her. Thanks. If you can't see the difference between a father paying his daughter a compliment about her appearance and a pedophile lusting after his own daughter, wanting to commit incest, there's something very wrong with you.
> He is a pedo via the Epstein thing, but I digress.
As soon as he discovered what Epstein was up to he wanted to have nothing more to do with him. If he's a pedo by association, then so is Stephen Hawking.
> It's perfectly normal to want to date your fucking daughter. He's from New York, not fucking Alabama.
He didn't say he wanted to date her. Thanks. If you can't see the difference between a father paying his daughter a compliment about her appearance and a pedophile lusting after his own daughter, wanting to commit incest, there's something very wrong with you.
> He is a pedo via the Epstein thing, but I digress.
As soon as he discovered what Epstein was up to he wanted to have nothing more to do with him. If he's a pedo by association, then so is Stephen Hawking.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,677
Matt tries to solicit pictures of a teenage girl's vulva. Totally not weird.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,726
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 53 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,727
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 1 year ago, 35 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,728
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,736
@1,315,727 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> What about this?
I wasn't going to comment because I'm not the greatest defender of Trump's behaviour and not interested when it comes to whataboutism, but since you asked - in the 90s when he said it, a little creepy but no different from what anybody who considered themselves the ultimate playboy might have said - note that he didn't say now, he said in ten years. Fast forward 30 years, by today's neo-puritanical, nanny-culture standards, downright creepy and unacceptable.
> What about this?
I wasn't going to comment because I'm not the greatest defender of Trump's behaviour and not interested when it comes to whataboutism, but since you asked - in the 90s when he said it, a little creepy but no different from what anybody who considered themselves the ultimate playboy might have said - note that he didn't say now, he said in ten years. Fast forward 30 years, by today's neo-puritanical, nanny-culture standards, downright creepy and unacceptable.
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 year ago, 24 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,737
@1,315,728 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> It's a different type of compliment than calling your child beautiful
It's very difficult to find the whole clip where he says this on The View. If you look at the context, he was trying to defuse the topic. The host had asked:
"I'm afraid to ask this question, but what would you do if Playboy put Ivanka on the cover of the magazine."
I mean, what kind of a fucking question is that to ask somebody about their daughter on national TV to start with?
His initial answer was:
"It would be really disappointing — not really — but it would depend on what was inside the magazine."
Then they were pushing for a comment, saying:
"That's this girl's right, people assume there will be nude photos." ... "But if there weren't you wouldn't have an issue with it?"
Which is when he said:
"I don't think Ivanka would do that inside the magazine, although she does have a very nice figure. I've said that if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her."
I think he handled the situation well - the idiot hosts of The View got their sound bite, got their chance to giggle and call him weird, and he managed to turn his answer into a nice, if slightly dodgy, compliment.
If you look at Ivanka, she clearly wasn't phased at all.
This whole thing is yet another giant nothing burger, spun out of proportion by the left.
> It's a different type of compliment than calling your child beautiful
It's very difficult to find the whole clip where he says this on The View. If you look at the context, he was trying to defuse the topic. The host had asked:
"I'm afraid to ask this question, but what would you do if Playboy put Ivanka on the cover of the magazine."
I mean, what kind of a fucking question is that to ask somebody about their daughter on national TV to start with?
His initial answer was:
"It would be really disappointing — not really — but it would depend on what was inside the magazine."
Then they were pushing for a comment, saying:
"That's this girl's right, people assume there will be nude photos." ... "But if there weren't you wouldn't have an issue with it?"
Which is when he said:
"I don't think Ivanka would do that inside the magazine, although she does have a very nice figure. I've said that if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her."
I think he handled the situation well - the idiot hosts of The View got their sound bite, got their chance to giggle and call him weird, and he managed to turn his answer into a nice, if slightly dodgy, compliment.
If you look at Ivanka, she clearly wasn't phased at all.
This whole thing is yet another giant nothing burger, spun out of proportion by the left.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,738
Anonymous G double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,739
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 45 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,740
@1,315,659 (B)
You Americans have an age of consent ot 21, and many of your politicians want to raise it even higher. You have no perspective on this...
You Americans have an age of consent ot 21, and many of your politicians want to raise it even higher. You have no perspective on this...
Bullshit Detector. replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,742
@previous (H)
> You Americans have an age of consent ot 21, and many of your politicians want to raise it even higher. You have no perspective on this...
https://www.bhwlawfirm.com/legal-age-consent-united-states-map/
16 -17 -18
Not a single state has it at 21
Clearly the country you live in has a horrid education system.
> You Americans have an age of consent ot 21, and many of your politicians want to raise it even higher. You have no perspective on this...
https://www.bhwlawfirm.com/legal-age-consent-united-states-map/
16 -17 -18
Not a single state has it at 21
Clearly the country you live in has a horrid education system.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,744
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,745
@1,315,737 (C)
Did they ask him because he has a connection to Playboy magazine? How did it come up?
Did they ask him because he has a connection to Playboy magazine? How did it come up?
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,746
Trump is definitely weird about his daughter though. Once when she was an adult, they went on a talk show and the host asked what they have in common. Ivanka said golf, I believe, and Trump said sex
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,747
"dating" sounds like a euphemism, like "sleeping"
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,752
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,753
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,754
@previous (A)
Age doesn't make a difference to you when you were trying to get an underaged girl to send you pics of her vulva.
Age doesn't make a difference to you when you were trying to get an underaged girl to send you pics of her vulva.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 24 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,756
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 57 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,758
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,767
@1,315,745 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Did they ask him because he has a connection to Playboy magazine? How did it come up?
Honestly I have no idea. You'll have to look for the whole episode. I can't find it anywhere online.
> Did they ask him because he has a connection to Playboy magazine? How did it come up?
Honestly I have no idea. You'll have to look for the whole episode. I can't find it anywhere online.
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,788
@1,315,747 (boof)
> "dating" sounds like a euphemism, like "sleeping"
In the 50s & 60s (Trump's youth) it meant going on dates with, i.e. dinner, movie, bowling etc., basically courting. It certainly didn't mean fucking.
> "dating" sounds like a euphemism, like "sleeping"
In the 50s & 60s (Trump's youth) it meant going on dates with, i.e. dinner, movie, bowling etc., basically courting. It certainly didn't mean fucking.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,804
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,806
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Dating absolutely lead to sex during that era.
Yes, of course... well, it lead to marriage, then sex. However there was no fucking involved during the dating period, at least there wasn't meant to be in civilized society.
(Source: parents & grandparents)
> Dating absolutely lead to sex during that era.
Yes, of course... well, it lead to marriage, then sex. However there was no fucking involved during the dating period, at least there wasn't meant to be in civilized society.
(Source: parents & grandparents)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,808
She's pretty. Her father is a bad person.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,822
Thomas B Rutter joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,824
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,827
@1,315,822 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Tons of people had premarital sex in the 60s. What are you talking about?
Why are you being dense? It's so tiresome. I am talking about what people generally meant by the term "dating" in the 50s & 60s. I'm not talking about what they actually got up to. It may be a euphemism for sex today, but it wasn't back then.
> Tons of people had premarital sex in the 60s. What are you talking about?
Why are you being dense? It's so tiresome. I am talking about what people generally meant by the term "dating" in the 50s & 60s. I'm not talking about what they actually got up to. It may be a euphemism for sex today, but it wasn't back then.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,832
@previous (C)
It was a euphamusn for going on dates, and then necking, and then fucking
It was a euphamusn for going on dates, and then necking, and then fucking
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 26 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,835
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,840
@1,315,832 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> It was a euphamusn for going on dates, and then necking, and then fucking
No it wasn't. Thanks.
We need Syntax's take on this. He's the only person old enough to remember.
> It was a euphamusn for going on dates, and then necking, and then fucking
No it wasn't. Thanks.
We need Syntax's take on this. He's the only person old enough to remember.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,842
@previous (C)
It's weird you think you ate with this
A very common date at that time was called "parking". Also people would ride on things called the tunnel of love so that they could make out. Or go to the movies for the same reason
Did you never date??
It's weird you think you ate with this
A very common date at that time was called "parking". Also people would ride on things called the tunnel of love so that they could make out. Or go to the movies for the same reason
Did you never date??
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,844
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> It's weird you think you ate with this
I'm weird? You are completely bonkers for going on arguing the toss about this when you are 100% wrong. What are you trying to gain/prove?
> A very common date at that time was called "parking". Also people would ride on things called the tunnel of love so that they could make out. Or go to the movies for the same reason
Yes, so? Did he say "parking"? No. He said "dating", which, at the time meant, specifically, courting in public. Emphasis on in public. What may or may not have happened after the date is irrelevant.
> Did you never date??
I have dated, but how is that relevant? I am not from that era.
> It's weird you think you ate with this
I'm weird? You are completely bonkers for going on arguing the toss about this when you are 100% wrong. What are you trying to gain/prove?
> A very common date at that time was called "parking". Also people would ride on things called the tunnel of love so that they could make out. Or go to the movies for the same reason
Yes, so? Did he say "parking"? No. He said "dating", which, at the time meant, specifically, courting in public. Emphasis on in public. What may or may not have happened after the date is irrelevant.
> Did you never date??
I have dated, but how is that relevant? I am not from that era.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,845
@previous (C)
When people dated, they always took time to find places to be alone
You'd know that if you had actually dated
When people dated, they always took time to find places to be alone
You'd know that if you had actually dated
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 38 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,852
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> When people dated, they always took time to find places to be alone
>
> You'd know that if you had actually dated
Yes, Kook. This is irrelevant to the argument about semantics.
You know what, so tired of this - have it your way: Trump is a raging pedo who, when he said "perhaps I'd be dating her." what he actually meant was, "I wanna take her out, park with her and fuck her."
> When people dated, they always took time to find places to be alone
>
> You'd know that if you had actually dated
Yes, Kook. This is irrelevant to the argument about semantics.
You know what, so tired of this - have it your way: Trump is a raging pedo who, when he said "perhaps I'd be dating her." what he actually meant was, "I wanna take her out, park with her and fuck her."
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,853
@previous (C)
That is what he meant as evident by the multiple gross comments he's made about her
That is what he meant as evident by the multiple gross comments he's made about her
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 30 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,854
@1,315,742 (Bullshit Detector.)
Why would any education system that isn't America teach what America's age of consent is? You stupid son of a bitch, fuck you!
Why would any education system that isn't America teach what America's age of consent is? You stupid son of a bitch, fuck you!
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 6 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,907
grown men don't go on dates, unless with a teen
"go out somewhere", sure, but date? fuck off
"go out somewhere", sure, but date? fuck off
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,942
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,962
@previous (K)
> It's the same thing.
Apparently it isn't - Kook proved that "dating" is synonymous with "fucking".
> It's the same thing.
Apparently it isn't - Kook proved that "dating" is synonymous with "fucking".
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,963
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,315,983
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,316,020
