Erik !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later[^][v]#1,314,363
Begum begone. Don't worry though, she'll still try and get back in when those who hate the uk throw money at lobbyists because they want to set a precedent that opens the door to all the other isis fighters who are also locked out of the UK.
Only the euro people can now do anything. Knowing what they're like, they'll say that the UK has to let her return. Probably that will be the thing that makes the UK leave th ECHR.
Erik !saAqdaazn2 double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,314,412
@1,314,403 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
And the US government can fuck right off. Telling us to follow their example and bring their isis fighters back home. They can rot.
> Begum begone. Don't worry though, she'll still try and get back in when those who hate the uk throw money at lobbyists because they want to set a precedent that opens the door to all the other isis fighters who are also locked out of the UK.
In July 2020, the Court of Appeal ruled that Begum could return to the UK to contest the government's decision to rescind her British citizenship. It was unclear how she would return to the UK to plead her case, as the British government had previously stated that it would never let her return.[10] The Home Secretary appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom; in February 2021 the court ruled in Begum v Home Secretary in favour of the Home Secretary on all grounds.[11][12]
On 22 February 2023, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission rejected her appeal against revocation of her British citizenship, which effectively prohibits her from entering the United Kingdom. Begum's lawyers said they would appeal the decision.[55][56] On 23 February 2024, the Court of Appeal unanimously rejected a further appeal from her against the commission's decision.[65]
On 7 August 2024, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled she will not be allowed to challenge the removal of her British citizenship as the grounds of her case "do not raise an arguable point of law"..[
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,314,499
@1,314,410 (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Sorry I believe in second chances. @1,314,412 (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
I do think making someone stateless is a bit indefensible but so is joining ISIS so I pretty much don't care what happens to her. @1,314,476 (A)
We can talk out our differences over a nice bottle of wine.