Topic: Facebook are apparently pedophile defenders.
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #120,023 How in the ever-loving Christ is this post hate speech? If you mean hate speech against pedophiles, fair enough, but is that really the hill you want to die on?
Because how the fuck was this hate speech against gays or even trannies.
This was an anti-pedo post and Facebook restricted my account for hate speech.
You really want to die on this hill, Mark, Meta, whomever you call yourselves?
You fucking pervs. Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 12 minutes later[^] [v] #1,314,324 @OP
Nobody cares about this except you.
Go outside and touch grass, please.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,325 Death threats against anyone will get your post removed, that doesn't mean they are defending them.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,326 Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 15 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,333 You didn't pay your influencer tax (hold up a protein powder or E-bike in your photo next time)
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 9 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,336 @OP
what they are indicating is the defaming of homos and trannies by making them out to be p, so rest easy
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,344 @previous (boof )
That's literally not what that post was incinerating.
Facebook are fucking tards.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago , 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,345 boof replied with this 1 year ago , 54 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,353 @1,314,344 (A)
ohhhh that was your comment. apparently if any human reviewed it, they is not so good with the Anglais
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago , 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,354 Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,366 @1,314,353 (boof )
They banned
@OP for not using the latest version of newspeak. Thanks.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,314,400 @1,314,354 (D)
I hadn't considered growing a skullet then using hair rollers
↕