Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,313,799
I wonder if anybody really has a clear picture of what is going on, there's people protesting and then there's people rioting. In both groups there's racists and normal people. Then there's the normal everyday "thugs" scoring in on the action.
Then there's police brutality and incompetence and general chaos. Couple all that with a media, the way that it is, and you get a big mess
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,313,847
@1,313,799 (D) > there's people protesting and then there's people rioting. In both groups there's racists and normal people. Then there's the normal everyday "thugs" scoring in on the action. > Then there's police brutality and incompetence and general chaos. Couple all that with a media, the way that it is, and you get a big mess
This. Except the people protesting really do have genuine complaints that are being ignored. E.g. Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs (before you cry racism and islamaphobia etc, I'm calling them that because it is factually correct - that is demonstrably their ethnicity). More recently they are upset about the child murders in Southport and the disproportionate response from the government. They are also annoyed about being conflated with "far right thugs" by Starmer and feel betrayed and disenfranchised. Those cunts throwing bricks, attacking mosques and doing Nazi salutes are really not helping though.
> before you cry racism and islamaphobia etc, I'm calling them that because it is factually correct - that is demonstrably their ethnicity
The people who get mad at pointing that out have never argued it was incorrect, they just get mad because you've associated something negative with a "minority group".
They have never cared about truth, only feelings. This disclaimer is pointless, because the people that understand weren't offended in the first place.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,313,914
@1,313,849 (G) > they just get mad because you've associated something negative with a "minority group".
Yes, exactly like how the chavs are mad because they're being associated with a minority group of "right wing thugs".
> This disclaimer is pointless
No it wasn't. People are very quick to label others racist and play whatabout games.
> because the people that understand weren't offended in the first place.
Yes, but there are several more who don't understand or don't know and get offended on their behalf.
> > they just get mad because you've associated something negative with a "minority group". > Yes, exactly like how the chavs are mad because they're being associated with a minority group of "right wing thugs".
No, they're mad that the two-tier policing system gives rapists and murderers lighter sentences than natives who post mean things on social media.
> > > they just get mad because you've associated something negative with a "minority group". > > Yes, exactly like how the chavs are mad because they're being associated with a minority group of "right wing thugs". > No, they're mad that the two-tier policing system gives rapists and murderers lighter sentences than natives who post mean things on social media.