Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 6 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,311,342
@1,311,260 (E)
Of course it hurts. I never said otherwise. The point is that she did not throw it, and they were far away, and there were tons of other options besides killing her.
> Of course it hurts. I never said otherwise. The point is that she did not throw it, and they were far away, and there were tons of other options besides killing her.
List the "tons" of other options. And leaving her alone and letting her go is not an option at this point.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,311,349
@previous (H)
1. Stepping back.
2. Leaving the house.
3. Tazing her.
4. De-escalating and talking her down like police in many countries are trained to do.
boof (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 35 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,311,352
@1,311,346 (H)
did you know that she was the one who called the police because she was afraid of a prowler outside? they found none, but then the guy decides to check the lady out in case there's something else to find, because he's bored? I don't know. Anyway he tells the lady to take care of the pot that's boiling and she complies with every bark. Then he gets suddenly enraged by the word "rebuke".
> 1. Stepping back.
No and there are no law enforcements who will do that. > 2. Leaving the house.
They will not just turn their back on a suspect and leave. > 3. Tazing her.
This is a possibility but with that pan of water she would have been electrocuted or boiled. > 4. De-escalating and talking her down like police in many countries are trained to do.
Yes wasting tax dollars and calling a swat team and a negotiator for some dumb bitch who won't put a pan of water down...ok > > That's just off the top of my head.
You stated a ton. So now you have had time to think. List 6 more of your bright ideas. I would guess 10 would equal a ton. You have listed 4.
Anonymous K replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,311,394
@previous (B)
Why did you not get pissed when Ashley Babbitt was shot and killed? Wouldn't a taser been more efficient? Or is it because you believe she was a part of the so called "coup", that she got what she deserved?
Anonymous K replied with this 1 year ago, 35 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,311,407
@1,311,396 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Then would you agree all the protesters during the peaceful protests rioting all across the country should have been gunned down as well?
@previous (B)
At one point, you said she got what she deserved, now you think differently?
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Do you not consider any type of officer government officials(city police, county sheriff, state police, FBI, CIA, Secret Service)?
I've noticed you're changing your stance on this gun issue. First you bitch and complain about cops killing unarmed black people, and would never say anything about unarmed white people being shot.
Now all of a sudden after you were called out about Babbitt being shot while unarmed, you act like you're trying be on both sides.
> I think if you'd ask the right questions in the right way, you'd be surprised again
the only surprise is that you dont actually have a legitimate stance on anything and like to be obtuse in the dumbest way possible because you get off on arguing with everyone over anything