Minichan

Topic: Democratic economic theory: the idea that the government can create wealth simply by declaring it.

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #119,519

Keynesian delusion, the idea that money itself is wealth, and the more you make the better your economy.

Cancel student loans but don't ask where the money comes from or you will realize the working poor are subsidizing the upper-middle class

Give new homebuyers $10,000 to help them buy a house but ignore that home sellers were charging as much as they could, and this will just raise prices by $10,000. And don't ask where the money comes from, because if the answer is homeowners, that means you are giving people the same as your taking, which is pointless. And if everyone (renters and homeowners alike) are paying for this, that means it's a redistribution of money from poor renters to middle-class homeowners.

Create new jobs by spending billions more but never think about where that money would have been, and what jobs it would have created if it weren't taxed to begin with

Confusing wealth with claims on that wealth is one of many examples of democrats being completely thoughtless.

(Edited 27 minutes later.)

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 6 hours later[^] [v] #1,310,086

@OP
Ashli Babbitt is still dead.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,089

@previous (B)
So is your mom

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,092

@1,310,086 (B)
Yes, the left likes making a martyr of anyone who challenges their dogma.

Workers create wealth, printing money does not.

(Edited 14 seconds later.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 23 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,099

Cancelling the studant loans is pretty bunk - it rewards the people that could afford to take on the risk in the first place. If college was free to start with (not arguing for or against that here), then it would really have been equal opportunity for everyone.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,100

ur and idiot. lots of working class have loans for nursing school. rich ppl pay cash and often dont need that many loans.

taxes should come from those who have plenty ie big businesses and rich and go to better places ie jobs that woukdnt exist otherwise.
duh.

Anonymous E double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,101

@1,310,099 (D)
loans are given to most anybody these days so not really an issue. they cant even be killed with bankruptcy now i think.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,102

@1,310,100 (E)

> lots of working class have loans for nursing school.

Those are not the people that are struggling to pay it back. Nursing pays for itself.

> rich ppl pay cash and often dont need that many loans.

I'm not talking about the rich, but about the millions of middle and upper-middle class that took out 6 figure loans for degrees with no job prospects and want the taxpayers to foot the bill.

>
> taxes should come from those who have plenty ie big businesses and rich and go to better places ie jobs that woukdnt exist otherwise.

Those are exactly the people who avoid taxes the best. They won't be paying for it, even if the law tries to make them. Their money is protected, offshored, and they have accountants to make it look like they operate a loss.

It will only be the working class that ends up covering this.

(Edited 29 seconds later.)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,107

More pro trump bullshit posted by a clearly retarded faggot

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 31 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,111

@previous (F)
If you think economic literacy is "pro-Trump" that says a lot.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 28 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,115

@1,310,092 (A)
Let me know when you make an argument that resurrects Ashli Babbitt's bullet-ridden corpse.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 30 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,122

@previous (G)
I'm not emotionally attached to some random supporter of Trump.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,310,123

@1,310,100 (E)
> taxes should come from those who have plenty ie big businesses and rich and go to better places ie jobs that woukdnt exist otherwise.

what stopping those big businesses from relocating and taking the entire economy with them?

> ur and idiot.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.