Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,309,231
@previous (A)
Removing guns from America would be impossible, there's too many, and the people that don't want to cooperate have every means to resist.
If Democrats could have their way somehow, it would just lead to authoritarianism. A population that was forced to obey the police. Democrats say cops are racist and that only they should have guns. hmmmm
> Removing guns from America would be impossible, there's too many, and the people that don't want to cooperate have every means to resist. > > If Democrats could have their way somehow, it would just lead to authoritarianism. A population that was forced to obey the police. Democrats say cops are racist and that only they should have guns. hmmmm
@1,309,234 (A)
Please tell me how you round up the guns when there's more guns than people and they had trouble just dealing with the Bundys.
One family could stand up to them because the operations are expensive. They don't want the press. If this was tried the government would just give up or collapse.
> False dichotomy. > > > Please tell me how you round up the guns when there's more guns than people and they had trouble just dealing with the Bundys. > > One family could stand up to them because the operations are expensive. They don't want the press. If this was tried the government would just give up or collapse.
when did anyone ever round up guns? what the fuck is wrong with you?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 41 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,309,250
@1,309,239 (B)
Pull a 1986 like they did with the full auto or a Bill Clinton and limit capacity - you don't take guns, you just outlaw the sale of new guns and it sorts itself out in 20-30 years as supply decreases.
Democrats WANT to remove guns from society, and have no real plan on how to do that. So every time there's a shooting we get to hear the same whiny lines about how Republicans are responsible because they don't want to pass a lot of ineffective laws that remove due process.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,309,253
@previous (B)
What we really need are common sense federal gun laws that would further protect the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The states are getting to up some draconian bullshit, as per usual.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,309,254
@previous (G)
That would be fine, but democrats always write these bills in the worst ways possible.
The laws don't properly distinguish between different firearms. They stigmatize people who seek help for mental illness, and give a pass to people who stay out of that system. They remove due process, an allegation enough can be enough under red flag laws.
All democrats ever manage to do is drum up fear, and push sales higher. If they actually passed the laws it wouldn't work the way they expect it to.
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,309,255
@previous (B)
With democrats it's always "Do you really need 1200 rounds for your weekend hunting trip?" and never "I've read and understood the US constitution and having sworn to support and defend it, I cannot vote for this bill."
> > when did anyone ever round up guns? > > When did I ever say that happened? > > Democrats WANT to remove guns from society, and have no real plan on how to do that. So every time there's a shooting we get to hear the same whiny lines about how Republicans are responsible because they don't want to pass a lot of ineffective laws that remove due process.
My best guess is you don't understand the difference between "democrats want to" and "when did anyone ever round up guns?". Saying they want to isn't the same as saying they did.
> No, you didn't. > > My best guess is you don't understand the difference between "democrats want to" and "when did anyone ever round up guns?". Saying they want to isn't the same as saying they did. > > This isn't hard.
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,309,274
The Big Guy is very disappointed that you're not obeying his explicit orders to avoid mentioning the gun debate. That's scheduled for next week, retard. Hunter will be around to your place soon to sort this out