Topic: Republican senators are saying Biden literally ordered the shooting
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #119,370
lol these people really are nutjobs
Eternal God emperor Obama joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,308,929
He should get over it. We ban guns
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,933
Democrats have been losing this election since the debate. Now you're whining that political violence isn't working the way you thought it was.
Anyone watching screaming woke college kids yell over anyone who disagreed, or twitter warriors who can't refute any arguments and just call people names should have seen this coming.
When one party can't win in calm discussions with good ideas, they resort to other means. Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent democrats.
Anyone watching screaming woke college kids yell over anyone who disagreed, or twitter warriors who can't refute any arguments and just call people names should have seen this coming.
When one party can't win in calm discussions with good ideas, they resort to other means. Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent democrats.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,935
@previous (C)
What is your evidence that "the Democrats" were involved? The shooter was wearing a right wing shirt.
What is your evidence that "the Democrats" were involved? The shooter was wearing a right wing shirt.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,937
Which senators?
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,938
@1,308,935 (A)
Sure he was probably on board with project 2025 but couldn't find any left wing politicians nearby and this had to do.
Sure he was probably on board with project 2025 but couldn't find any left wing politicians nearby and this had to do.
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 year ago, 45 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,939
@1,308,937 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
The bicameral part is confusing for Matt. At least its the same branch!
The bicameral part is confusing for Matt. At least its the same branch!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,943
@1,308,937 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Sorry, Representative. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republican-mike-collins-accuses-biden-ordering-trump-shooting-1235059900/
Sorry, Representative. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republican-mike-collins-accuses-biden-ordering-trump-shooting-1235059900/
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,945
@1,308,935 (A)
> What is your evidence that "the Democrats" were involved?
So you're insinuating a republican was the shooter?
> The shooter was wearing a right wing shirt.
WTF did you expect the shooter to wear to get in there un-noticed? Are you really this stupid or just really that drunk.
> What is your evidence that "the Democrats" were involved?
So you're insinuating a republican was the shooter?
> The shooter was wearing a right wing shirt.
WTF did you expect the shooter to wear to get in there un-noticed? Are you really this stupid or just really that drunk.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,946
@previous (E)
I asked you first. What is your evidence that the Democrats were involved? I want an answer, not another question.
Second, what's your evidence that he wore a right wing shirt to "get in there un-noticed"? He could have worn a plain shirt. Answer, not questions, please.
I asked you first. What is your evidence that the Democrats were involved? I want an answer, not another question.
Second, what's your evidence that he wore a right wing shirt to "get in there un-noticed"? He could have worn a plain shirt. Answer, not questions, please.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,952
@previous (A)
You don't need to answer for my point to be made about you, the questions were sarcasm you dipshit.
You don't need to answer for my point to be made about you, the questions were sarcasm you dipshit.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,308,957
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,032
@1,308,946 (A)
Do you have a photo of the shooter wearing said shirt, or are you going by what the media told you?
Do you have a photo of the shooter wearing said shirt, or are you going by what the media told you?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,037
@1,308,935 (A)> The shooter was wearing a right wing shirt.
The description of his shirt shows no sign of him being right wing. You act like every democrat is against guns. You didn't have an issue with owning guns several years ago when you were posting pictures on here claiming you owned them.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,046
Blueanon
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,089
Biden said this 5 days before the shooting. He didn't even qualify it by saying peacefully and patrioticallyKook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,092
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,101
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,103
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,105
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
A long-haired Republican? An actual republican can land a shot, this was a democrat. This BlueAnon cult nonsense is convincing people that attacks against Republicans are all because of Republicans. Just think about how stupid that sounds.
A long-haired Republican? An actual republican can land a shot, this was a democrat. This BlueAnon cult nonsense is convincing people that attacks against Republicans are all because of Republicans. Just think about how stupid that sounds.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,107
@previous (C)
It's weird that you think a Republican can't have long hair. Also this was a hard shot to make. Very odd mindset from you
It's weird that you think a Republican can't have long hair. Also this was a hard shot to make. Very odd mindset from you
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,110
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Also this was a hard shot to make.
He had an assault rifle. One bullet grazed Trump and the other shots missed. He was a horrible shot if he can't hit his target with an assault rifle on multiple shots.
> Also this was a hard shot to make.
He had an assault rifle. One bullet grazed Trump and the other shots missed. He was a horrible shot if he can't hit his target with an assault rifle on multiple shots.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,113
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,115
@previous (I)It was an AR-15 Which the NRA with the assistance of the Republican Party makes totally available to all who desire it.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 51 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,116
@previous (K)
If you change your stylesheet to https://minichan.net/style/black.css you can post from an assault fora
If you change your stylesheet to https://minichan.net/style/black.css you can post from an assault fora
Anonymous K replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,118
@1,309,032 (F)
According to US media reports, Crooks was wearing a T-shirt from Demolition Ranch, a YouTube channel known for its guns and demolition content. The channel has millions of subscribers featuring videos on different guns and explosive devices.
According to US media reports, Crooks was wearing a T-shirt from Demolition Ranch, a YouTube channel known for its guns and demolition content. The channel has millions of subscribers featuring videos on different guns and explosive devices.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,119
@1,308,935 (A)
> What is your evidence that "the Democrats" were involved? The shooter was wearing a right wing shirt.
there isnt any, these dumb motherfuckers instantly started blaming "the deep state" as soon as it happened
> What is your evidence that "the Democrats" were involved? The shooter was wearing a right wing shirt.
there isnt any, these dumb motherfuckers instantly started blaming "the deep state" as soon as it happened
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,121
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,124
Chuckle Brother 2 !ErY2TknG0w replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,127
@1,309,118 (K)
> According to US media reports, Crooks was wearing a T-shirt from Demolition Ranch, a YouTube channel known for its guns and demolition content. The channel has millions of subscribers featuring videos on different guns and explosive devices.
So that makes them far right extremists?
> According to US media reports, Crooks was wearing a T-shirt from Demolition Ranch, a YouTube channel known for its guns and demolition content. The channel has millions of subscribers featuring videos on different guns and explosive devices.
So that makes them far right extremists?
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 36 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,139
@1,308,935 (A)
> The shooter was wearing a right wing shirt.
Oh well that proves he was definitely a Nazi then. Case closed. Lol, have you any idea how ridiculous you sound?
He must have known he was going to die. I bet he wore that shirt just to make clots like you foam at the mouth and leap to conclusions.
> The shooter was wearing a right wing shirt.
Oh well that proves he was definitely a Nazi then. Case closed. Lol, have you any idea how ridiculous you sound?
He must have known he was going to die. I bet he wore that shirt just to make clots like you foam at the mouth and leap to conclusions.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,142
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,157
Again which senators? You have failed to name a single republican senator.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,163
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,170
Tell us again about the guns you own Matt.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,189
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,191
Anonymous M replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,198
@previous (N)
> wasn't it a 150 yard shot?
150 meters (164 yards). This is the same distance from which U.S. Army recruits must hit a target to qualify with the M16 assault rifle in basic training. Glad you think that's a piece of cake with an AR semi-automatic (basically the civilian version of the military M16).
> wasn't it a 150 yard shot?
150 meters (164 yards). This is the same distance from which U.S. Army recruits must hit a target to qualify with the M16 assault rifle in basic training. Glad you think that's a piece of cake with an AR semi-automatic (basically the civilian version of the military M16).
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,199
@previous (M)
I take my opinion from the shooting experts who said on the news that anybody should be able to line up a target with a scoped rifle and hit it from that distance.
I take my opinion from the shooting experts who said on the news that anybody should be able to line up a target with a scoped rifle and hit it from that distance.
Anonymous L replied with this 1 year ago, 53 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,200
@1,309,124 (I)
> I'll have you know there are very fine retards on both sides of this debate
no, sorry, any jingoistic fuckwads/maga morons are the only retards.
> I'll have you know there are very fine retards on both sides of this debate
no, sorry, any jingoistic fuckwads/maga morons are the only retards.
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 3 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,201
Anonymous M replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,309,204
@1,309,199 (N)
> "shooting experts"
In Red Dead Redemption 2?
If anything, the shooter's mistake was in trying to be cool and going for a head shot. If he'd aimed for the heart it would be all over.
> "shooting experts"
In Red Dead Redemption 2?
If anything, the shooter's mistake was in trying to be cool and going for a head shot. If he'd aimed for the heart it would be all over.