Topic: If Biden drops out, the favored replacement could be a transwoman.
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #119,166
Gretchen could be the nominee. Biden says he wont drop out but the media is already manufacturing consent for it, and the only other name that has been dropped is Gavin Newsom.Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,307,511
Gretchen whom?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 10 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,512
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 26 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,513
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,514
If he drops out or croaks it'll Kamala and a generic white man, probably a governor. Gretch'll be a candidate in '28 or '32.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,516
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,517
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,518
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,537
@previous (B)
Her bone structure gives it away, I've never seen a ciswoman with a face that masculine.
Her bone structure gives it away, I've never seen a ciswoman with a face that masculine.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,539
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,541
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,543
@1,307,539 (B)
Bone structure is real evidence.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I go out a lot, and when I'm out I'm looking at women more than anything else. Even big women don't have those angles to their face.
Bone structure is real evidence.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I go out a lot, and when I'm out I'm looking at women more than anything else. Even big women don't have those angles to their face.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,544
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,545
@previous (B)
I don't need to be, I live amongst men and women and can see obvious signs drawing from that experience.
Even if you ignore how sharp and large her facial bones are, why does she have wide shoulders like that?
It doesn't take a doctor to realize this.
I don't need to be, I live amongst men and women and can see obvious signs drawing from that experience.
Even if you ignore how sharp and large her facial bones are, why does she have wide shoulders like that?
It doesn't take a doctor to realize this.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,546
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,547
@previous (B)
Yes, and at certain extremes those body types reveal their sex with a high degree of accuracy.
Yes, and at certain extremes those body types reveal their sex with a high degree of accuracy.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,548
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,550
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Like I said, I have seen bigger women, and the shape of their bones isn't like this even when they have pronounced facial bones. They may have wider shoulders, but never in the proportions that Gretchen does.
Like I said, I have seen bigger women, and the shape of their bones isn't like this even when they have pronounced facial bones. They may have wider shoulders, but never in the proportions that Gretchen does.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 28 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,553
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,557
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,558
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,562
You can always tell, eh op?
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,578
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,582
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
The people controlling a global empire won't leave it up to chance.
Any time a candidate offers real change they are sabotaged, and any time a politician proposes advancing empire they have everything rigged in their favor.
Democracy is there so people can scratch the itch telling them to get involved, and it's effective at placating people.
The people controlling a global empire won't leave it up to chance.
Any time a candidate offers real change they are sabotaged, and any time a politician proposes advancing empire they have everything rigged in their favor.
Democracy is there so people can scratch the itch telling them to get involved, and it's effective at placating people.