Topic: America has always been the Land of the Free
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #119,141
Which must have come as somewhat of a surprise to all the slaves.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,307,142
too bad that statement was made after the emancipation proclamation, you dont know that because you're a retarded faggot
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,146
The descendents of those slaves voted for inflation and money printing and now they have the same to show for a hard day's work.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 13 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,157
@previous (C)
The descendants of those slaves could not even vote until recently. Try again, racist.
The descendants of those slaves could not even vote until recently. Try again, racist.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,160
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,161
@previous (C)
My point is that black people were slaves, and only recently got legal rights on paper, but there is still massive institutional racism in "the land of the free."
My point is that black people were slaves, and only recently got legal rights on paper, but there is still massive institutional racism in "the land of the free."
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,164
@previous (A)
> My point is that black people were slaves, and only recently got legal rights on paper, but there is still massive institutional racism in "the land of the free."
"recently" i.e. 100+ years ago, how fucking stupid are you
> My point is that black people were slaves, and only recently got legal rights on paper, but there is still massive institutional racism in "the land of the free."
"recently" i.e. 100+ years ago, how fucking stupid are you
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,165
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 5 seconds later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,166
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 28 seconds later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,167
@previous (A)
That's a few years before wages stopped keeping up with the economy. Do you think that's a coincidence?
That's a few years before wages stopped keeping up with the economy. Do you think that's a coincidence?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,168
@previous (C)
Source to your data? Also, yes, a coincidence. It was also around the time that Republicans turned evil.
Source to your data? Also, yes, a coincidence. It was also around the time that Republicans turned evil.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,169
@1,307,166 (A)
> 1964 is 100+ years ago?
emancipation proclamation wasn't written in 1964 you obtuse faggot
> 1964 is 100+ years ago?
emancipation proclamation wasn't written in 1964 you obtuse faggot
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 45 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,170
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,171
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 22 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,172
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,173
@previous (A)
So you do think it's a coincidence that the moment they got the right to vote the economy stopped working?
So you do think it's a coincidence that the moment they got the right to vote the economy stopped working?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,175
@previous (C)
Yes. I also find it telling that this thread exists to make a point about freedom owning slaves, and you immediately jumped in to argue against black people.
Yes. I also find it telling that this thread exists to make a point about freedom owning slaves, and you immediately jumped in to argue against black people.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,178
@previous (A)
You pretend to be against slavery but don't care about a system that is equivalent to it. People need to work, they are paid subsistence wages that provide them just enough to keep living, and have no legal way out of it.
In order for that system to end people need to understand how it works, and you and the other Democrats don't want that because it comes back to devaluing the dollar.
You pretend to be against slavery but don't care about a system that is equivalent to it. People need to work, they are paid subsistence wages that provide them just enough to keep living, and have no legal way out of it.
In order for that system to end people need to understand how it works, and you and the other Democrats don't want that because it comes back to devaluing the dollar.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,179
@previous (C)
The modern system is not "equivalent to slavery". It sucks, but it's not human chattel slavery. That id something utterly different.
The modern system is not "equivalent to slavery". It sucks, but it's not human chattel slavery. That id something utterly different.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,181
@previous (A)
I never said "chattel", you are making a strawman because you are unable to respond to what I actually said, thanks.
For the record, there are people stuck in agricultural work to survive. The only thing Democrats ever say about that is that we need immigrants to exploit because no one here wants to do that work. People would do that work, but only for a fair pay. Hence the Demokkkratic agenda to import desperate migrants.
I never said "chattel", you are making a strawman because you are unable to respond to what I actually said, thanks.
For the record, there are people stuck in agricultural work to survive. The only thing Democrats ever say about that is that we need immigrants to exploit because no one here wants to do that work. People would do that work, but only for a fair pay. Hence the Demokkkratic agenda to import desperate migrants.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,211
@1,307,161 (A)
> My point is that black people were slaves, and only recently got legal rights on paper, but there is still massive institutional racism in "the land of the free."
What can I do that a black person can't?
What right do I have that black people doesn't?
> My point is that black people were slaves, and only recently got legal rights on paper, but there is still massive institutional racism in "the land of the free."
What can I do that a black person can't?
What right do I have that black people doesn't?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,213
@previous (D)
Here's just one of many examples. Studies have sent in the exact same CV/resume to a job. One had a "white" name like Mary, the other a "black" name like Tamika. Overwhelmingly, with everything else exactly the same, the white names got the jobs. That's just one example of many of the racism that exists. On paper, it's all equal, but in reality, it's not.
Here's just one of many examples. Studies have sent in the exact same CV/resume to a job. One had a "white" name like Mary, the other a "black" name like Tamika. Overwhelmingly, with everything else exactly the same, the white names got the jobs. That's just one example of many of the racism that exists. On paper, it's all equal, but in reality, it's not.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,216
@previous (A)
Would you rather hire John Williams, Jr, or Laquicha Floyd, for your high power executive job?
Would you rather hire John Williams, Jr, or Laquicha Floyd, for your high power executive job?
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,219
@1,307,213 (A)
Wow! What a coincidence! I just watched a video on YouTube where a white guy said the same exact thing, and guess what? The black guy put him in his place about "black names".
Forward to 6 minutes and 15 seconds and watch this black guy, with a black sounding name, discredit everything this dumbass said. I bet you won't.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kvHrY55QdlA&pp=ygUpQ2hhcmxpZSBLaXJrIElOU1VMVEVEIEJ5IEFycm9nYW50IFN0dWRlbnQ%3D
Wow! What a coincidence! I just watched a video on YouTube where a white guy said the same exact thing, and guess what? The black guy put him in his place about "black names".
Forward to 6 minutes and 15 seconds and watch this black guy, with a black sounding name, discredit everything this dumbass said. I bet you won't.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kvHrY55QdlA&pp=ygUpQ2hhcmxpZSBLaXJrIElOU1VMVEVEIEJ5IEFycm9nYW50IFN0dWRlbnQ%3D
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,227
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,232
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,240
@1,307,227 (A)
So no argument about a black guy shutting up a white guy about black sounding names? @1,307,219 (D)
So no argument about a black guy shutting up a white guy about black sounding names? @1,307,219 (D)
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,241
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,242
KILL NIGGERS NOW!!!!
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 11 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,243
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 1 second later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,244
@1,307,241 (C)
I don't know, you tell me. Matt made the claim here @1,307,213, (A) I'm just waiting for him to give me the facts.
I don't know, you tell me. Matt made the claim here @1,307,213, (A) I'm just waiting for him to give me the facts.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,246
@1,307,213 (A)
> Here's just one of many examples. Studies have sent in the exact same CV/resume to a job. One had a "white" name like Mary, the other a "black" name like Tamika. Overwhelmingly, with everything else exactly the same, the white names got the jobs. That's just one example of many of the racism that exists. On paper, it's all equal, but in reality, it's not.
> tamika
thats racist, you think black people cant have white names?
> Here's just one of many examples. Studies have sent in the exact same CV/resume to a job. One had a "white" name like Mary, the other a "black" name like Tamika. Overwhelmingly, with everything else exactly the same, the white names got the jobs. That's just one example of many of the racism that exists. On paper, it's all equal, but in reality, it's not.
> tamika
thats racist, you think black people cant have white names?
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 47 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,261
And Matt "suddenly" goes silent.
Chuckle Brother 2 !ErY2TknG0w joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,323
Why did Matt abandon his thread?