Topic: If you're going to accuse all trans people of being child groomers...
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #119,119
...maybe don't get caught literally grooming a child yourself.Pic related.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,307,011
The word literally is doing all kinds of heavy lifting here.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,019
@OP
> ...maybe don't get caught literally grooming a child yourself.
>
> Pic related.
i was wondering what happened to that guy
> ...maybe don't get caught literally grooming a child yourself.
>
> Pic related.
i was wondering what happened to that guy
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 59 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,025
Whom is that?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 7 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,056
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 18 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,058
@OP
> ...maybe don't get caught literally grooming a child yourself.
>
> Pic related.
what, I can't believe Hall or Oates, I think that's Oates, would do that
> ...maybe don't get caught literally grooming a child yourself.
>
> Pic related.
what, I can't believe Hall or Oates, I think that's Oates, would do that
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 13 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,190
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 18 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,194
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That could mean anything. I think it is important context that the police have decided that it's nothing they need to take action over.
That could mean anything. I think it is important context that the police have decided that it's nothing they need to take action over.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,198
@previous (B)
You can be an absolute creep without police deciding to get involved
You can be an absolute creep without police deciding to get involved
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,200
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You can be an absolute creep without police deciding to get involved
And you can also not be an absolute creep without the police deciding to get involved.
> You can be an absolute creep without police deciding to get involved
And you can also not be an absolute creep without the police deciding to get involved.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,201
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,204
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,206
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,209
@previous (B)
What we know is
1. Twitch saw whisper conversations he was having with a minor and banned him
2. Discord also banned him
3. Later, a twitch mod claimed he had been
caught having inappropriate conversations with a minor. 13 I think is the age they stated
4. Dr Disrespect made an oddly worded statement where he admitted he had engaged in conversations with a minor that veered into inappropriate territory or something similar
5. Dr Disrespects media company dropped him after they researched info on this
Also Dr Disrespect tries to edit the word minor out of his own statement and them added it back in after he found out that the site he was using had edit logs
What we know is
1. Twitch saw whisper conversations he was having with a minor and banned him
2. Discord also banned him
3. Later, a twitch mod claimed he had been
caught having inappropriate conversations with a minor. 13 I think is the age they stated
4. Dr Disrespect made an oddly worded statement where he admitted he had engaged in conversations with a minor that veered into inappropriate territory or something similar
5. Dr Disrespects media company dropped him after they researched info on this
Also Dr Disrespect tries to edit the word minor out of his own statement and them added it back in after he found out that the site he was using had edit logs
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,215
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Was he being a gooner goblin? Was he making roiland tier jokes? Was he making innuendos? Was he telling explicit stories about railing other people (which he was doing at the time)? There are many possibilities, it is presumptuous to say he was being a groomer.
Was he being a gooner goblin? Was he making roiland tier jokes? Was he making innuendos? Was he telling explicit stories about railing other people (which he was doing at the time)? There are many possibilities, it is presumptuous to say he was being a groomer.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,221
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,223
@1,307,201 (D)
> You can also be a great person and the police will still beat you or kill you. ACAB
Screenshot saved and sent to the FBI. I hope you think I'm fucking joking.
> You can also be a great person and the police will still beat you or kill you. ACAB
Screenshot saved and sent to the FBI. I hope you think I'm fucking joking.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 29 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,224
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,379
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,391
Catherinedraad.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,307,455
@1,307,379 (B)
I think a lot of what you typed could be considered grooming
I think a lot of what you typed could be considered grooming
(Edited 12 seconds later.)