Topic: it's taken just two generations for the world to forget the lessons of WWII
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #119,069
fucking insanity
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,306,536
Yep. Republicans WANT a fascist dictatorship.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,541
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 39 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,543
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,564
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,585
The democrats are the party that decided to blame everything on one "privileged" group and use them as a patsy for everything.
What group is "the jews" for the Republicans? They don't claim trans people are running society, or that black people are rich.
What group is "the jews" for the Republicans? They don't claim trans people are running society, or that black people are rich.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,587
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,588
@previous (E)
The Nazis blamed all their problem on one group, and everyone in the party was on board with that.
The democrats do that, the republicans don't.
The Nazis blamed all their problem on one group, and everyone in the party was on board with that.
The democrats do that, the republicans don't.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,595
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,596
@previous (F)
It's tempting to dismiss the word altogether because people misuse it, but there really are signs of fascism that people should know and look out for.
The Democrats have been manically and psychotically trying to excuse starting a large scale war with Russia, including a campaign of demonizing and dehumanizing the citizens. The Democrats have pushed more and more for censorship under the principle of "not platforming hate" to silence any criticism of their ideology. The Democrats have organized large-scale trespassing and road-blocking in their anti-jewish demonstrations.
It's tempting to dismiss the word altogether because people misuse it, but there really are signs of fascism that people should know and look out for.
The Democrats have been manically and psychotically trying to excuse starting a large scale war with Russia, including a campaign of demonizing and dehumanizing the citizens. The Democrats have pushed more and more for censorship under the principle of "not platforming hate" to silence any criticism of their ideology. The Democrats have organized large-scale trespassing and road-blocking in their anti-jewish demonstrations.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 52 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,602
dw !p9hU6ckyqw double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,604
Isn't it inherent to a two party system to blame everything on the other group
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,605
@1,306,602 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
It's the democrats framing everything explicitly into racial and gender categories.
It's the democrats framing everything explicitly into racial and gender categories.
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 years ago, 23 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,606
@1,306,604 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Yes.
Claiming to be better than the alternative doesn't mean you need to make idpol your approach to politics. You could have two competing parties that both avoided idpol.
Yes.
Claiming to be better than the alternative doesn't mean you need to make idpol your approach to politics. You could have two competing parties that both avoided idpol.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,608
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,609
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 48 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,618
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
It's considered a republican thing by democrats projecting the feedback they get constantly.
It's considered a republican thing by democrats projecting the feedback they get constantly.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,708
@1,306,585 (D)
@1,306,596 (D)
@1,306,605 (D)
@previous (D)
Delusional brainrot. I truly fear for the future.
@1,306,596 (D)
@1,306,605 (D)
@previous (D)
Delusional brainrot. I truly fear for the future.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,728
@previous (A)
The party of the KKK wants to elect Biden as president despite him warning of a "racial jungle", and ignores accusations against him because they are inconvenient.
You're being delusional by ignoring everything to justify voting in a racist rapist.
The party of the KKK wants to elect Biden as president despite him warning of a "racial jungle", and ignores accusations against him because they are inconvenient.
You're being delusional by ignoring everything to justify voting in a racist rapist.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,787
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 37 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,791
boof replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,817
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,820
@1,306,728 (D)
What is the party of the KKK? Why would they want to elect Biden? Why would the KKK want a "racial jungle"? What legitimate accusations are ignored? Who is a racist rapist?
What is the party of the KKK? Why would they want to elect Biden? Why would the KKK want a "racial jungle"? What legitimate accusations are ignored? Who is a racist rapist?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,821
@1,306,728 (D)
> The party of the KKK wants to elect Biden as president despite him warning of a "racial jungle", and ignores accusations against him because they are inconvenient.
>
> You're being delusional by ignoring everything to justify voting in a racist rapist.
"racial jungle" is not a word anyone on the planet has ever said
> The party of the KKK wants to elect Biden as president despite him warning of a "racial jungle", and ignores accusations against him because they are inconvenient.
>
> You're being delusional by ignoring everything to justify voting in a racist rapist.
"racial jungle" is not a word anyone on the planet has ever said
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 49 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,828
@previous (I)
> "racial jungle" is not a word anyone on the planet has ever said
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-racial-jungle-quote/
> "racial jungle" is not a word anyone on the planet has ever said
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-racial-jungle-quote/
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,832
@previous (D)
> > "racial jungle" is not a word anyone on the planet has ever said
> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-racial-jungle-quote/
not clicking that cp link
> > "racial jungle" is not a word anyone on the planet has ever said
> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-racial-jungle-quote/
not clicking that cp link
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,834
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,838
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,842
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,844
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,845
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,849
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,852
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,853
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,861
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,873
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,306,887
@previous (C)
And yours said he wanted to fuck his own daughter when she was 13 and that he wanted to date her.
And yours said he wanted to fuck his own daughter when she was 13 and that he wanted to date her.