Topic: Your thoughts?
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #118,844
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,304,450
This makes you look like a pedophile
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,452
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,454
Can she call me Pappy? She like RVs and fishin'?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,455
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 29 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,461
Yeah. Depicting a 28 year old woman as about 60, and then a 40 year old man having sex with an 18 year old. You look like a gross creep
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,464
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,465
@1,304,461 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Yeah. Depicting a 28 year old woman as about 60, and then a 40 year old man having sex with an 18 year old. You look like a gross creep
whats wrong with that???
> Yeah. Depicting a 28 year old woman as about 60, and then a 40 year old man having sex with an 18 year old. You look like a gross creep
whats wrong with that???
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,471
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,474
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Because according to this logic, the man is Skeletor. It's fucking weird, incel shit
i dont understand how that makes it incel shit
> Because according to this logic, the man is Skeletor. It's fucking weird, incel shit
i dont understand how that makes it incel shit
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 31 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,475
Anonymous F double-posted this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,476
@1,304,471 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Weird that this way of thinking is so prevalent.
It's almost as if sex evolved to reproduce, and 40 year old men can have healthy offspring and older women can't.
All these women had the chance to lock down a man, but were too narcissistic and entitled to approve of anyone, and are now bitter they don't get the attention they used to.
Meanwhile the 40yo men never got such an easy option and had to grind their whole life for the opportunity to get a healthy mate.
Weird that this way of thinking is so prevalent.
It's almost as if sex evolved to reproduce, and 40 year old men can have healthy offspring and older women can't.
All these women had the chance to lock down a man, but were too narcissistic and entitled to approve of anyone, and are now bitter they don't get the attention they used to.
Meanwhile the 40yo men never got such an easy option and had to grind their whole life for the opportunity to get a healthy mate.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,481
@1,304,450 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Saying that makes you look like the pedophile. You were the one who saw two adults engaged in sexual activity and immediately thought about how old they both were 10 years ago or whatever. You imagined them together at those ages and manufactured your faux outrage.
Saying that makes you look like the pedophile. You were the one who saw two adults engaged in sexual activity and immediately thought about how old they both were 10 years ago or whatever. You imagined them together at those ages and manufactured your faux outrage.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,482
@1,304,476 (F)
There finding out that sperm doesn't age as well as previously thought. You can easily research this
Also, this is basically admitting that having father in a childs life isn't very important
There finding out that sperm doesn't age as well as previously thought. You can easily research this
Also, this is basically admitting that having father in a childs life isn't very important
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 28 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,483
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 1 year ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,484
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,487
@1,304,482 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> There finding out that sperm doesn't age as well as previously thought. You can easily research this
That doesn't change the fact that female fertility drops off much faster and causes more problems then males.
Why do you think men are more selective about age across the world then women?
> Also, this is basically admitting that having father in a childs life isn't very important
Not really, because most people that understand this would say it's better to have men and women marry in their 20s. It's the women putting it off and setting their standards so high only a man who's spent decades working on it meets those standards.
> There finding out that sperm doesn't age as well as previously thought. You can easily research this
That doesn't change the fact that female fertility drops off much faster and causes more problems then males.
Why do you think men are more selective about age across the world then women?
> Also, this is basically admitting that having father in a childs life isn't very important
Not really, because most people that understand this would say it's better to have men and women marry in their 20s. It's the women putting it off and setting their standards so high only a man who's spent decades working on it meets those standards.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,488
@1,304,483 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I can't help you with your perceptions
what the fuck are you talking about, i am asking you about YOUR perceptions
> I can't help you with your perceptions
what the fuck are you talking about, i am asking you about YOUR perceptions
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,489
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 10 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,490
@1,304,484 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Creeps
2 adults consenting to sex, you're calling it child sex, and you call Anon F and G creeps?
I see Dave is really grooming you.
> Creeps
2 adults consenting to sex, you're calling it child sex, and you call Anon F and G creeps?
I see Dave is really grooming you.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,491
@previous (C)
Radical feminists think social pressure will change men's behavior and let the low standards + high demand for women last forever.
Of course it won't for two reasons: 1. People generally can't just choose to ignore something critically selected for by natural selection. 2. Even if they could, once demand was spread out like it is for men they'd get the same mediocre level of attention men are used to their whole life.
If feminists could be reasoned with they wouldn't be feminists.
Radical feminists think social pressure will change men's behavior and let the low standards + high demand for women last forever.
Of course it won't for two reasons: 1. People generally can't just choose to ignore something critically selected for by natural selection. 2. Even if they could, once demand was spread out like it is for men they'd get the same mediocre level of attention men are used to their whole life.
If feminists could be reasoned with they wouldn't be feminists.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 45 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,500
@1,304,487 (F)
Sperm is still a big factor in child retardation and autism. Pretending it's not is senseless
So maybe Op shouldn't be promoting an elderly man having children with a teen?
Sperm is still a big factor in child retardation and autism. Pretending it's not is senseless
So maybe Op shouldn't be promoting an elderly man having children with a teen?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 35 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,501
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 1 year ago, 26 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,502
Zupapa, dyslexic demon (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,504
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 23 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,505
@1,304,488 (E)
I think its very weird and incel behavior to depict a 28 year old woman as elderly, while also showing a man who is far older than her, having sex with a teen
In fact, I think obsessing over teens is very odd behavior on its own
I think its very weird and incel behavior to depict a 28 year old woman as elderly, while also showing a man who is far older than her, having sex with a teen
In fact, I think obsessing over teens is very odd behavior on its own
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 35 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,506
@1,304,504 (Zupapa, dyslexic demon)
But isn't it? Because you've used an elderly woman to depict a 28 year old
But isn't it? Because you've used an elderly woman to depict a 28 year old
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 1 year ago, 49 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,507
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 49 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,516
@1,304,450 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
First you said :
> This makes you look like a pedophile
Then you said:
@1,304,502 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I never said child sex
Does having sex with a child not make you a pedophile?
First you said :
> This makes you look like a pedophile
Then you said:
@1,304,502 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I never said child sex
Does having sex with a child not make you a pedophile?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,520
Op is based. Old used up roasties and trannies stay seething.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,521
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,524
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Implication of what? You have failed to state why you think OP posting that makes him look like a pedophile.
Implication of what? You have failed to state why you think OP posting that makes him look like a pedophile.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,526
@1,304,500 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Pretending it's not is senseless
I never pretended it was immune to aging, the only actual claim made was that it's relatively less than women, and that difference is significant.
>
> So maybe Op shouldn't be promoting an elderly man having children with a teen?
Why? Do you think sex is an icky thing? A bad thing men do to women?
You are undermining an adult woman's own choice, and if you had you way their consent wouldn't matter because men would be pressured out of it anyway.
You can't claim the moral high ground when you are taking choices away from women who reached an age where it's supposed to be their choice.
> Pretending it's not is senseless
I never pretended it was immune to aging, the only actual claim made was that it's relatively less than women, and that difference is significant.
>
> So maybe Op shouldn't be promoting an elderly man having children with a teen?
Why? Do you think sex is an icky thing? A bad thing men do to women?
You are undermining an adult woman's own choice, and if you had you way their consent wouldn't matter because men would be pressured out of it anyway.
You can't claim the moral high ground when you are taking choices away from women who reached an age where it's supposed to be their choice.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,528
@1,304,524 (C)
You're taking a man who is geriatric and implying a much younger woman is too old for him while also showing him have sex with a teen
You're taking a man who is geriatric and implying a much younger woman is too old for him while also showing him have sex with a teen
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 46 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,529
@1,304,526 (F)
We don't know how significant it is yet
No one has taken a choice away from anyone what a dumb comment
We don't know how significant it is yet
No one has taken a choice away from anyone what a dumb comment
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,530
@1,304,501 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
A large portion of the population doesn't understand consent, the people represented in the bottom, a group that includes you.
That is worth discussing.
A large portion of the population doesn't understand consent, the people represented in the bottom, a group that includes you.
That is worth discussing.
Anonymous F double-posted this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,537
@1,304,529 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> We don't know how significant it is yet
Any topic in science can always be researched further, but there is no question that women's aging has a bigger impact for two reasons:
Gamete age: women's gametes are as old as they are. Men's gametes are always new, it's the machinery making them that is decaying. A 40 year old cell is going to have less DNA integrity than a cell made by a 40 year old organ, the organ itself getting new cells to replace old ones.
Women carry the child: All the nutrients, oxygen, and immune support are coming from the woman. When those get reduced with aging it's only relevant for the mother, not the father.
>
> No one has taken a choice away from anyone what a dumb comment
Feminists are trying to create a culture where men are sanctioned for it. That's no different than having a "gay friendly society" where people still have to hide it so they don't get subtly punished by the community (despite no laws imprisoning them). A gay person in the south can't actually have a relationship if their small town will treat them like a pariah.
> We don't know how significant it is yet
Any topic in science can always be researched further, but there is no question that women's aging has a bigger impact for two reasons:
Gamete age: women's gametes are as old as they are. Men's gametes are always new, it's the machinery making them that is decaying. A 40 year old cell is going to have less DNA integrity than a cell made by a 40 year old organ, the organ itself getting new cells to replace old ones.
Women carry the child: All the nutrients, oxygen, and immune support are coming from the woman. When those get reduced with aging it's only relevant for the mother, not the father.
>
> No one has taken a choice away from anyone what a dumb comment
Feminists are trying to create a culture where men are sanctioned for it. That's no different than having a "gay friendly society" where people still have to hide it so they don't get subtly punished by the community (despite no laws imprisoning them). A gay person in the south can't actually have a relationship if their small town will treat them like a pariah.
Anonymous F triple-posted this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,541
@1,304,528 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
His age is irrelevant to who would make for a good partner.
The reason he's old is because men are pushed to get better until they meet certain standards. All these men would prefer to get it at 18 without having to put in the work, but that's not an option.
The reason the other woman is considered old is that women are past their prime. Any of them could have started a family, if they didn't it's because of their own choices.
Many guys don't even get to have a partner, or only get the illusion of it
His age is irrelevant to who would make for a good partner.
The reason he's old is because men are pushed to get better until they meet certain standards. All these men would prefer to get it at 18 without having to put in the work, but that's not an option.
The reason the other woman is considered old is that women are past their prime. Any of them could have started a family, if they didn't it's because of their own choices.
Many guys don't even get to have a partner, or only get the illusion of it
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,543
@1,304,530 (F)
@1,304,537 (F)
@previous (F)
Yeah,I'm definitely going to take advice on consent from a bitter, kissless incel
@1,304,537 (F)
@previous (F)
Yeah,I'm definitely going to take advice on consent from a bitter, kissless incel
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 43 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,544
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,545
Anonymous F double-posted this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,546
@1,304,544 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That's not what many say when they are polled. If there's any bias wouldn't men say they had 1-2 partners at that point?
Irrelevant anyway, because if it's a fling and she only stays around while she profits those men are going to keep trying and they won't suddenly gain an attraction to barren women because they themselves are older.
That's not what many say when they are polled. If there's any bias wouldn't men say they had 1-2 partners at that point?
Irrelevant anyway, because if it's a fling and she only stays around while she profits those men are going to keep trying and they won't suddenly gain an attraction to barren women because they themselves are older.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,550
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 15 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,551
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,553
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)Nearly a third say no sex in the past year.
Most of those that do are paying for it.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,575
@1,304,528 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> a man who is geriatric
40 is not geriatric you clown!
> have sex with a teen
Calling her "a teen", while technically accurate, is deliberately mischaracterising, and you know it. If you say "a teen" and not an adult (which she is legally) in most people's minds that translates as 13 to 17.
You are doing the very thing you are accusing OP of, and it makes YOU look creepy.
> a man who is geriatric
40 is not geriatric you clown!
> have sex with a teen
Calling her "a teen", while technically accurate, is deliberately mischaracterising, and you know it. If you say "a teen" and not an adult (which she is legally) in most people's minds that translates as 13 to 17.
You are doing the very thing you are accusing OP of, and it makes YOU look creepy.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,598
@1,304,528 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> with a teen
You are an adult at the age of 18. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
> with a teen
You are an adult at the age of 18. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 44 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,605
Kook is the women at the bottom lol
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,628
@1,304,575 (G)
It's geriatric when compared to the depiction of the woman at the bottom
She is a teen, thanks
It's geriatric when compared to the depiction of the woman at the bottom
She is a teen, thanks
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 44 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,629
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 1 year ago, 26 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,630
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC quadruple-posted this 1 year ago, 15 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,631
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,635
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 31 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,644
@1,304,630 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Shes still a teen
No, she's not. She is considered a legal adult. Jesus you're fucking stupid.
> Shes still a teen
No, she's not. She is considered a legal adult. Jesus you're fucking stupid.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,647
@1,304,631 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Although the example given was a 28 year old, what it actually represents is a woman who hit the wall.
Although the example given was a 28 year old, what it actually represents is a woman who hit the wall.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 23 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,648
@1,304,629 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Anyone can look around and see most relationships involve a man paying for his partner.
The exception is when women are post-wall, and can no longer demand men pay for it.
Anyone can look around and see most relationships involve a man paying for his partner.
The exception is when women are post-wall, and can no longer demand men pay for it.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,653
@1,304,644 (C)
Yes she is. You can't just change the meaning of words because something makes your cock twitch
Yes she is. You can't just change the meaning of words because something makes your cock twitch
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 17 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,654
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 1 year ago, 35 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,655
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC quadruple-posted this 1 year ago, 24 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,656
Chuckle Brother 2 !ErY2TknG0w replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,658
@1,304,653 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Found some info..
In the United States, the age of majority, or when someone is considered an adult, varies by state and is usually set at 18 years old. At this age, a person is generally considered to be in control of their actions and responsible for their decisions. Some rights and responsibilities that come with turning 18 include:
Voting
Joining the military
Signing contracts
Changing names
Jury duty
Applying for credit cards
However, some states have different age of majority requirements, including:
Alabama, Colorado, Maryland, and Nebraska: 19 years old
Indiana and Mississippi: 21 years old
Found some info..
In the United States, the age of majority, or when someone is considered an adult, varies by state and is usually set at 18 years old. At this age, a person is generally considered to be in control of their actions and responsible for their decisions. Some rights and responsibilities that come with turning 18 include:
Voting
Joining the military
Signing contracts
Changing names
Jury duty
Applying for credit cards
However, some states have different age of majority requirements, including:
Alabama, Colorado, Maryland, and Nebraska: 19 years old
Indiana and Mississippi: 21 years old
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,659
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,660
@1,304,655 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm glad that I can be of assistance in explaining why I am loling @ u.
I'm glad that I can be of assistance in explaining why I am loling @ u.
Chuckle Brother 2 !ErY2TknG0w replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,661
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,662
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,663
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 50 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,664
@1,304,662 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You were just provided with the facts, and you still want to play stupid... Carry on then retard.
You were just provided with the facts, and you still want to play stupid... Carry on then retard.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,665
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 20 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,666
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 6 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,667
@1,304,663 (I)
Don't tell him he's the woman on the bottom, or it'll make him happy you're referring to him as a woman.
Don't tell him he's the woman on the bottom, or it'll make him happy you're referring to him as a woman.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 30 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,668
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 21 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,669
@1,304,666 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Everyone knows all this. Why do you think they dont?
Then why do you refer to them as teens? Oh, I forgot, because you're retarded.
> Everyone knows all this. Why do you think they dont?
Then why do you refer to them as teens? Oh, I forgot, because you're retarded.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,670
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,672
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,680
If you think adult women should make their own choices you're a misogynist now
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,684
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 16 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,685
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,687
@1,304,684 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You clearly have a problem with it if you're trying to shame men into forgoing those relationships.
Does a gay person actually get to make their own decisions if their potential partner is scared of becoming a pariah in their small southern town?
There's already feminists talking about raising the age of consent to 25 because "that's when the brain finishes developing".
Today it's deniable social pressures that aren't clearly written into the law. Tomorrow it's the state redefining rape to be any consenting relationship where the woman is still in her prime.
You clearly have a problem with it if you're trying to shame men into forgoing those relationships.
Does a gay person actually get to make their own decisions if their potential partner is scared of becoming a pariah in their small southern town?
There's already feminists talking about raising the age of consent to 25 because "that's when the brain finishes developing".
Today it's deniable social pressures that aren't clearly written into the law. Tomorrow it's the state redefining rape to be any consenting relationship where the woman is still in her prime.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,689
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,690
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 15 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,691
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,692
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I am totally Confucius about your reaction to OP's image. Yes there is an error re the older woman's age.
So why all the fuss?
I am totally Confucius about your reaction to OP's image. Yes there is an error re the older woman's age.
So why all the fuss?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,695
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,697
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,698
My fav thing about kook is that she will chastise someone for the stupidest fucking reasons and then when you ask her to explain her position it is essentially “because I said so”
Anonymous J replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,700
@1,304,695 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)Quality of the image is poor. The man and woman are of age. The older woman looks like Diana Keyton.
And not trying to pick a fight with you because I respect you. I just do not find it creepy.
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,701
@1,304,698 (K)
They all act like this because they think logic is a patriarchal invention meant to brainwash them.
They all act like this because they think logic is a patriarchal invention meant to brainwash them.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 11 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,702
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 29 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,703
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,706
@1,304,702 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
If you are being defensive about the woman in the bottom image, it sounds like you agree with the viewpoint.
If you actually respected the ability for adult women to make their own decisions you wouldn't see yourself in the bottom image, and you wouldn't be infantilizing the woman on top by calling it pedophilia.
If you are being defensive about the woman in the bottom image, it sounds like you agree with the viewpoint.
If you actually respected the ability for adult women to make their own decisions you wouldn't see yourself in the bottom image, and you wouldn't be infantilizing the woman on top by calling it pedophilia.
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,731
@1,304,628 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> She is a teen, thanks
So you keep saying, because it is a charged word that almost always implies "minor".
Do you deny that she is not a minor? Or in your universe is an "adult" strictly over the age of 20? Or is it perhaps 30?
> She is a teen, thanks
So you keep saying, because it is a charged word that almost always implies "minor".
Do you deny that she is not a minor? Or in your universe is an "adult" strictly over the age of 20? Or is it perhaps 30?
Anonymous J replied with this 1 year ago, 13 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,734
@1,304,703 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)Of course not. From OP's image I remember her in a movie with that expression. The older version was taken in 2016
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,740
@1,304,703 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Although the image uses "28" for meme purposes, the older woman represents a woman who has hit the wall.
Although the image uses "28" for meme purposes, the older woman represents a woman who has hit the wall.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,745
@1,304,731 (G)
Feminists think any woman under 25 is too underdeveloped to be entrusted with her own sexuality, and they think sex is a form of assault that can't be enjoyed by both people.
Feminists think any woman under 25 is too underdeveloped to be entrusted with her own sexuality, and they think sex is a form of assault that can't be enjoyed by both people.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 46 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,790
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 28 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,791
@1,304,731 (G)
I don't think she is a minor and never said she was. You were upset at calling a teen a teen
I don't think she is a minor and never said she was. You were upset at calling a teen a teen
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 1 year ago, 23 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,792
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC quadruple-posted this 1 year ago, 18 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,793
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 8 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,794
@1,304,740 (I)
If you know of any single women who have hit the wall in their late 20s - mid 30s please send them my way.
If you know of any single women who have hit the wall in their late 20s - mid 30s please send them my way.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,796
@1,304,792 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
If you understand it, then why are you preoccupied with anybody being exactly 28?
If you understand it, then why are you preoccupied with anybody being exactly 28?
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,804
@1,304,791 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I don't think she is a minor
Then why do you think the image depicts an act of pedophilia?
> I don't think she is a minor
Then why do you think the image depicts an act of pedophilia?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,814
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 34 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,815
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,816
18 doesn't instantly make someone mature, it's just the arbitrary number for the age of consent. The brain doesn't stop developing till your 20's, raise the age of consent and stop sexualizing people who a day ago were considered underage
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,817
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,842
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,844
> 28 year old woman
> Wait! What about what I think?!
Nobody cares what you think unless you're rich, powerful or beautiful. Thanks.
> Wait! What about what I think?!
Nobody cares what you think unless you're rich, powerful or beautiful. Thanks.
Anonymous N double-posted this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,845
@1,304,698 (K)
> then when you ask them to explain their position it is essentially "because I said so"
That is the default position of every user on this board. Thanks.
> then when you ask them to explain their position it is essentially "because I said so"
That is the default position of every user on this board. Thanks.
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 29 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,846
@1,304,815 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Oh I don't. I think it makes Op and whoever created it, look like creepy pedophiles
OK, so to summarize:
- You don't think an 18 year old is a minor.
- You don't think the image depicts an act of pedophilia.
- You don't seem to have a problem with sex between two consenting adults.
- However, you think the person who made the image is a creepy pedophile... Got it.
> Oh I don't. I think it makes Op and whoever created it, look like creepy pedophiles
OK, so to summarize:
- You don't think an 18 year old is a minor.
- You don't think the image depicts an act of pedophilia.
- You don't seem to have a problem with sex between two consenting adults.
- However, you think the person who made the image is a creepy pedophile... Got it.
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,847
@1,304,474 (E)
> i dont understand how that makes it incel shit
This, on a board populated almost entirely by cucks, simps and incels. "Weird incel shit" is clearly an understatement.
> i dont understand how that makes it incel shit
This, on a board populated almost entirely by cucks, simps and incels. "Weird incel shit" is clearly an understatement.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,851
@1,304,845 (N)
No, the other side to this doesn't try to derail the conversation with personal attacks and can actually stay consistent to their principles.
Woke people will pretend to support "two consenting adults making their own choices" and then make undermining that one of their pet issues.
No, the other side to this doesn't try to derail the conversation with personal attacks and can actually stay consistent to their principles.
Woke people will pretend to support "two consenting adults making their own choices" and then make undermining that one of their pet issues.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,304,855
Anonymous N replied with this 1 year ago, 22 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,305,130
@1,304,851 (F)
The board is dominated by narcissistic white males with OCD and debilitating sexual issues. Given the demographics, weird incel shite is inevitable in any given conversation.
The board is dominated by narcissistic white males with OCD and debilitating sexual issues. Given the demographics, weird incel shite is inevitable in any given conversation.
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,305,132
@previous (N)
OCD incels will create manifestos and infographics explaining their positions, it's feminists that are opposed to logic and data.
It's not that "both sides" just take a position and refuse to defend it.
OCD incels will create manifestos and infographics explaining their positions, it's feminists that are opposed to logic and data.
It's not that "both sides" just take a position and refuse to defend it.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,305,133
@1,305,130 (N)
Meh we always have had oddballs. Incel shit is annoying but it can be cured by just getting laid and having a girlfriend for a month. I trust our users will be able to do that.
Meh we always have had oddballs. Incel shit is annoying but it can be cured by just getting laid and having a girlfriend for a month. I trust our users will be able to do that.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 17 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,305,232
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,305,441
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,305,442
@1,305,133 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Most of the world has views that would qualify as incel shit, it's the woke yuppies that are in the minority. Everytime I see some frustrated guy get a girlfriend it doesn't work out, because most guys want intimacy not a fling where they overpay to get off.
Most of the world has views that would qualify as incel shit, it's the woke yuppies that are in the minority. Everytime I see some frustrated guy get a girlfriend it doesn't work out, because most guys want intimacy not a fling where they overpay to get off.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,305,453
@1,305,441 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I'm pretty sure I remember you telling us on IRC about your gf and her enormous strap-on.
I'm pretty sure I remember you telling us on IRC about your gf and her enormous strap-on.