Topic: Gary Johnson
sluggy started this discussion 15 years ago #11,875
Why am I not hearing about him?
Can anyone say anything bad about him? He seems to have all the good qualities of Ron Paul without any of the deal breakers.
Is this seriously happening? Is the media keeping the only competent candidate from running?
Can anyone say anything bad about him? He seems to have all the good qualities of Ron Paul without any of the deal breakers.
Is this seriously happening? Is the media keeping the only competent candidate from running?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later[^] [v] #213,630
nobody gives about your autistic sweaty mess
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 21 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #213,631
He seems like a pretty square guy. He's a bit of a long shot right now, but I hope he sticks to it and we see him in the future.
sluggy (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #213,632
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #213,633
@previous (sluggy)
Yeah, he won't sell with the "family values" voters because he actually believes in keeping government out of that shit. I have a feeling that the Republicans don't want to embrace him because they fear losing the religious vote.
Yeah, he won't sell with the "family values" voters because he actually believes in keeping government out of that shit. I have a feeling that the Republicans don't want to embrace him because they fear losing the religious vote.
sluggy (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #213,650
@previous (C)
Fuck. He could beat Obama.
That isn't a bad thing. That's a good thing, but he isn't gonna get the nomination.
Fuck. He could beat Obama.
That isn't a bad thing. That's a good thing, but he isn't gonna get the nomination.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #213,654
@previous (sluggy)
The GOP may pick up a lot more of the young voters and dissatisfied democrats by supporting him. It's a shame they're not desperate enough to try that yet.
The GOP may pick up a lot more of the young voters and dissatisfied democrats by supporting him. It's a shame they're not desperate enough to try that yet.
sluggy (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #213,655
@previous (C)
It's a shame they're all retarded or playing up to the very stupid tea badgers cause all tea badgers are retards. No exception. Ignorant, small-minded retards unable to understand anything.
It's a shame they're all retarded or playing up to the very stupid tea badgers cause all tea badgers are retards. No exception. Ignorant, small-minded retards unable to understand anything.
sluggy (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #213,656
Those fucking badgers. I don't know why they gave them the right to vote. They're animals!
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #213,658
hamfist !!snnYcROO9 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #213,659
I agree completely OP
He has my vote, even if it is futile
He has my vote, even if it is futile
hamfist !!snnYcROO9 double-posted this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #213,662
Trufax: Gary Johnson is the only GOP nominee viewed favorably in his own state
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #214,040
1. What are the deal-breakers that Ron Paul possesses that Gary Johnston doesn't?
2. Are these deal-breakers that you have identified a logical conclusion of a holistic political philosophy that you are rejecting because to do so would require a paradigm shift in thinking?
2. Are these deal-breakers that you have identified a logical conclusion of a holistic political philosophy that you are rejecting because to do so would require a paradigm shift in thinking?
