Topic: Which watch you want less?
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #118,749 #1 BGD 5650-1CJF negative display
#2 BGD 5650-1JF Normal display Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago , 49 seconds later[^] [v] #1,303,491 Idk why but I'm switching back and forth here. Just like my sexuality.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 15 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,492 I think the negative display looks modern and cool
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 46 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,494 @previous (B)
It does. The drawback is that readability is reduced somewhat
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,495 @previous (A)
Just use your eyes and you'll be okay
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,496 @previous (B)
Maybe I don't have time to use my eyes, cause I'm trying not to run over people on a forklift
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,503 @previous (A)
Maybe you should get a talking watch, or keep on airpod in your left ear and ask Siri for the time when you need it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,526 @previous (B)
Airpods not allowed, besides, I need a watch that can take a vicious beating
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 25 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,531 I don't want either but negative display
dw !p9hU6ckyqw double-posted this 1 year ago , 22 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,532 @1,303,526 (A)
So you get one made of plastic??
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 46 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,542 Why wear a watch when you have a phone?
poof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 49 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,546 like get one with a COCK on it
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 14 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,550 @1,303,532 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
It has to be, all the ones with metal are for wrists that are like twice my size
@1,303,542 (D)
Because phone not practical, trust meh
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,552 We ALL carry cell phones. They do what a watch does and you can see bare nakkid ladies as well.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,578 @1,303,526 (A)
Maybe you can get a sundial put onto your truck
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 4 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,619 @1,303,496 (A)
Maybe you do have time but don't know it because you haven't checked your watch yet
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 20 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,622 @previous (G)
I can't argue with that 🤣
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 1 year ago , 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,708 @1,303,550 (A)
Just don't get a g shock
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,727 so like, they should make a pocket watch so I can feel sophisticated when I bring it out of a vest pocket
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,773 @1,303,708 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Know of any other hardy digital watches you recommend? Preferably solar?
@previous (boof )
If you want to be sophisticated, you should buy a watch with pockets.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,774 @previous (I)
I know the solution, but it's fairly radical. I'm not sure you're ready to hear it.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago , 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,775 @previous (B)
Let's hear it.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,780 @previous (I)
Instead of spending a lot of money on one digital watch with solar power that claims to be rugged and hardy (but which will eventually wear and break in a manual job), it's better to take that money and go onto Temu, and buy many cheap wind-up watches for a dollar each, and replace them if they become damaged. Each individual watch will break faster than the expensive watch, but for the same price the cheap watch will last much longer. Additionally, they look like super expensive designer watches and people will think they're cool.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago , 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,781 @previous (B)
You're a mad man! Are you insane!?!?? Jesus Christ that's ruthless radicalism if I ever saw it.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,793 @previous (I)
I know, it's shocking and modern. It may not be for everyone. But I am convinced, that once you buy 50 identical cheap mechanical watches for a dollar each and replace them when they become worn, you'll never spend $50 on a single watch again.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,797 LESS: BLACK PEOPLE
MORE: CHAIRS
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 1 year ago , 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,880 @1,303,773 (I)
No I just shitpost
↕