Topic: The globe is FLAT
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #118,702 Think about it. If the globe was round, why can you not fall off it if you stand upside down? Globerounders have had to come up with a complicated and convoluted theory about "gravity" when it's obvious that the globe is flat and we're all just on the top of it.
Eternal God emperor Obama joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,303,194 Please delete this post. The devil told me to hide flat earth proof.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 12 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,200 You should take one for the team! Go to the edge and jump off!
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 29 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,210 If gravity was so obvious why did it take until Newton (a man who drank mercury and pushed spoons into his eyes as experiments) to finally discover it?
A flat earth is the simplest explanation, Occam's razor demands curve-cultists explain the unnecessary complexity.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,212 @previous (D)
It's so obvious because it's been indoctrinated into us. Like a lot of true things are, along with other things.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 4 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,214 @1,303,210 (D)
Drop something and see what happens.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago , 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,217 @previous (F)
Ok I just did, and it didn't fly off the way it would if it were really on a spinning sphere.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago , 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,219 @previous (D)
Because of gravity. QED. Thanks.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago , 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,220 @previous (F)
If you got more than the GED you would know how centrifugal force works. Unattached objects will fly off a spinning object.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago , 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,221 @previous (D)
Clearly, for falling objects, the force of gravity is stronger than the centrifugal force.
Anonymous F double-posted this 2 years ago , 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,222 @1,303,220 (D)
Also, I have a PhD in physics from Harvard, so there’s that.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago , 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,227 @previous (F)
I have a PhD in physics from Harvard and spent 40 years doing intensive postdoctoral work in physical geology and astronomy.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago , 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,228 @previous (D)
Only 40 years? lmao
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago , 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,229 @previous (F)
Yes, only 40 years because it would have interfered with my new specialties: kinematics and aerospace engineering.
No serious scientist would ever support a model that put the earth as a sphere. Repeating the pseudoscience a smug black man in a vest said on tiktok does not make you sound credible.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago , 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,230 @previous (D)
I have multiple PhDs in all those fields, plus 60 years of award winning postdoctoral research and publications in each.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous F double-posted this 2 years ago , 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,231 @1,303,229 (D)
Oh, I’m also a NASA astronaut who has been to space 23 times. I’ve seen the Earth (a globe) with my own eyes.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago , 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,232 @previous (F)
You are a lying shill.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago , 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,235 @previous (D)
Typical personal attack reply when I’ve out-reasoned you.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 12 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,236 both of these motherfuckers are lying because we haven't actually been to space
source: me, a guy thats smart as fuck
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago , 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,237 @1,303,235 (F)
Take your NASA blood money and fuck off.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago , 51 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,238 @previous (D)
Just what a lying idiot would say LMAO
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago , 58 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,239 @previous (F)
You're telling on yourself, keep digging deeper.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 6 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,278 @1,303,219 (F)
A theory so convoluted and complex that it required Newton to "invent a new form of math" (aka make shit up) to describe it. Occam's razor suggests that the globe is flat and it falls down because down is down.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago , 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,303,282
↕