Minichan

Topic: Mifepristone won't be banned after unanimous decision by Supreme Court.

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #118,583

This is a big day for prostitutes who want to defraud men.

Any man trying to start a family will spend many years supporting his gf with time and money, with no idea whether he's being used.

It's not enough to support sex workers, the country has to uphold their right to drain the energy out of men without consent. They can just say "I don't know what I want teehee", and since getting a partner is hard enough a man will just roll the dice and hope for the best.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 23 minutes later[^] [v] #1,302,435

Its obvious you're never going to be in a relationship with someone so why would you care?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 32 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,302,436

@previous (B)
> Its obvious you're never going to be in a relationship with someone
Because I acknowledge that women take advantage of men?

> why would you care?
1. It matters whether the country is able to maintain it's population (whites dying off and being replaced by immigrants isn't a solution)
2. Defrauding anyone, even men, is wrong.
3. Anyone would prefer their romantic partner was honest about their intentions.

Eternal God emperor Obama joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,302,445

This is a victory for us tyrants. Next we will repeal the first amendment and second amendment. Joe Biden will enforce both using dogs with ak47s.

Nazism is the future.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,302,456

wait a minute, not banned? that's like, opposite to a nanny state action

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 32 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,302,461

It odd that you'd want it to be banned

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 55 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,302,484

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
What an odd comment.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 22 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,302,486

@1,302,456 (boof)
No one is going to be working as a nanny if we abort all the babies first.

Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,302,490

@1,302,445 (Eternal God emperor Obama)
👆🏻
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.