Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,302,087
@1,302,081 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Was it relevant even? I thought it was text messages, maybe email I guess, that proved the timeline of him knowingly being on drugs and signing the paperwork saying he didnt, but idk I literally didn't watch the trial
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 24 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,302,093
It wasn't fair for Hunter, but what is the right supposed to do? Take each punch and turn the other cheek? Weaponizing the courts for politics was never going to be good for either side. Hush money payments don't matter, let the people decide in the polls. The DNC took Bernie off the ballot, and they want to take Trump off the ballot. Elites appointing their prepicked candidates.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,302,182
@previous (I)
Can't a geek be professional about their craft for once, I swear. I've unfucked a few computers in my day and you just ignore the internet aids they downloaded and get the damn thing fixed.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,302,194
@1,302,088 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Well it was obtained by a blind computer repair guy and was given to Tucker Swanson Carlson, why would that be real? Now that it is proven as a real thing, how is it relevant other than in this case and to possibly smear Joe Biden?
Once the data was obtained it was kinda a ritual for republican politicians to point out hunter bidens nudes that were leaked, and blame Joe Biden about it.
We don't need to rub facts in peoples faces unless they continue to rage that it was fake instead of irrelevant. Like the fact that trump lost. Everyone politely acknowledges that Biden is president unless someone is raging about trump actually winning, then the facts should be brought up over and over.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,302,258
@previous (M)
Ask the 60 court cases, most of whose judges were appointed by Trump, why they, in a court of law, decided that there was evidence of fraud as Trump claimed, then we'll talk. Thanks.