Minichan

Topic: FOA: Matt

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #118,415

In a straight choice between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, if you care about democracy, if you care about freedom, I don’t know how you could do anything other than vote for Donald Trump for precisely the reasons that you claim that you can’t.

You act as if a vote for Donald Trump is almost like you’re directly voting for Armageddon, like you see hysterical performances outside of courtrooms, endless MSNBC bombast. But I’m starting to think that no, a greater threat to democracy is this kind of technological feudalism, that tells you that it cares about you and that it’s protecting vulnerable people, all the while increasing censorship, increasing the funding of wars, increasing the division between ordinary Americans.

Please quit being a part of the problem.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,301,196

Matt is a Dixiecrat racist who is voting for Joe Biden because of his segregationist history.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 51 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,199

Matt will also vote for Bidumb so he can keep his food stamps, and continue to mooch off the government.

pew joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 33 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,205

still going cornel west
@previous (C)
if dems managed to bring back welfare id vote
but they didnt

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,243

Read Project 2025. That's why I cannot vote for Trump. It goes far beyond economy.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,268

This
> I don’t know how you could do anything other than vote for Donald Trump for precisely the reasons that you claim that you can’t.

Chuckle Brother 2 !ErY2TknG0w replied with this 1 year ago, 27 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,269

@previous (A)
Why are you citing yourself?

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,275

@1,301,243 (E)
Yeah I read he's also gonna Lock Her Up and make Mexico pay for the wall.

Oh and ban all Muslim immigration, and repeal and replace Obamacare, and...

(Edited 34 seconds later.)

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,285

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
He would if he could. This time, he has an army of enablers.

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,296

@previous (E)
> This time, he has an army of enablers.
Yeah remember when he won vast popular majorities over that Clinton lady and Biden in 2016 and 2020 respectively, right?

Oh wait that never happened 🤔

dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,329

> foa

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 21 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,330

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63851751

Anonymous E double-posted this 1 year ago, 21 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,331

@1,301,296 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I mean government officials that he will appoint. Again, read Project 2025.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 1 year ago, 33 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,332

@1,301,275 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Aren't those some of his main political ambitions

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,333

@1,301,275 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
He actually DID do a Muslim ban. The ONLY reason he did not repeal (and not replace) healthcare was that he could not get Congress to do it.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,346

@previous (E)
No he just banned certain shitty countries. He also blamed COVID on China and tried to restrict entries but libs cried about how racist he was for doing that and millions died.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,361

@OP
Don't worry, Matt's ready to polish Trump's knob at a moment's notice.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,400

Matt has hundreds of thousands in student loans that his rich cheapskate felon father won’t pay for so he’s desperate for Biden to give him free $$$

Imagine that, having all that debt to just work dead end community college jobs that pay like 30k a year LMAO

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 41 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,407

@previous (J)
Biden will wipe those loans and he'll be... still broke it sounds like.

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,430

@1,301,346 (H)
He did a Muslim ban.

Anonymous E double-posted this 1 year ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,431

@1,301,400 (J)
My student loans are 100% paid off. I did it 7 years ago. I think it's public record, so go look for yourself since you're so obsessed.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,434

@previous (E)
Why would we go check? Then you'd accuse everyone of stalking and obsession.

You didn't think that one through, did you berk?

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,437

@previous (C)
Because you are so sure of yourselves, but you are wrong.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,442

@previous (E)

> Because you are so sure of yourselves

Frankly, no one gives a shit. It's fun getting under your skin and watch you rage.

> but I am wrong.

We know you are, but you sure love digging yourself into a deeper hole.

Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,444

@previous (C)
No one gives a shit, 20 years and thousands of posts notwithstanding? lol

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,449

@previous (E)

> No one gives a shit

Exactly :)

> 20 years and thousands of posts I make about myself? lol

We know you're obsessed with yourself.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,462

@previous (C)
How old are you?

Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,465

@previous (L)
How old do you think I am?

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,467

@1,301,462 (L)

> How old are you?

He's 55.

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,468

@1,301,465 (C)

> How old do you think I am?

You slipped up you berk :) You were doing passably well up to that point, I was rooting for you!

Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,480

@1,301,430 (E)

Wrong.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,486

@1,301,467 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Is that older or younger than you?

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,495

@previous (N)
What I wouldn't give to be 55 again!

Tee Gee Comicksz joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,301,510

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)

> > Is that older or younger than you?

> What I wouldn't give to be 55 again!

An impertinent answer to a simple "older or younger" question.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.