Topic: 35 years ago today, in Tiananmen Square...
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #118,362
...what happened?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 53 seconds later[^] [v] #1,300,699
Nothing happened. This date never even existed.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,703
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,705
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,706
The government, in loving service to the people, stopped a dangerous and violent revolution.
Eternal God Emperor Obama joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,735
Someone questioned my fellow dictator in China so i suggested they just go full Stalin on their ass. We nazi dictators stand together against the people.
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,740
@1,300,705 (D)
Facebook and Reddit will censor unapproved opinions, and Twitter did before it was purchased. The government was even working with Twitter to help decide which posts to filter.
It's different when it happens here, right?
Facebook and Reddit will censor unapproved opinions, and Twitter did before it was purchased. The government was even working with Twitter to help decide which posts to filter.
It's different when it happens here, right?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 36 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,748
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,762
@1,300,740 (G)
> Facebook and Reddit will censor unapproved opinions, and Twitter did before it was purchased. The government was even working with Twitter to help decide which posts to filter.
>
> It's different when it happens here, right?
Have you seen twitter lately? If you believe elons bullshit about “free speech absolutism” you are fucking delusional and should kill yourself as soon as possible
> Facebook and Reddit will censor unapproved opinions, and Twitter did before it was purchased. The government was even working with Twitter to help decide which posts to filter.
>
> It's different when it happens here, right?
Have you seen twitter lately? If you believe elons bullshit about “free speech absolutism” you are fucking delusional and should kill yourself as soon as possible
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,771
I have some misgivings about the governing authority in China
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,823
@1,300,762 (I)
He hasn't been a free speech purist, but most of the censorship is reversing what the left does.
It's not a bad strategy. It may look hypocritical, but if the left actually makes a big deal of letting opposing opinions on they open up the can of worms for every other social media platform.
Why should the right be expected to play fair when the left does this all the time?
He hasn't been a free speech purist, but most of the censorship is reversing what the left does.
It's not a bad strategy. It may look hypocritical, but if the left actually makes a big deal of letting opposing opinions on they open up the can of worms for every other social media platform.
Why should the right be expected to play fair when the left does this all the time?
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,832
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,833
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,836
@previous (G)
why should they, being beat all the hell by goons and going to prison for cornholing all those years, who can blame them for rising up and killing these nazi fucks
why should they, being beat all the hell by goons and going to prison for cornholing all those years, who can blame them for rising up and killing these nazi fucks
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 25 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,839
@previous (boof)
The left wants to disarm people, and the way every leftist policy is designed, it would disarm trans people for past suicide attempts, disarm the struggling men in their own ranks who are open about their anger to their therapists, and do nothing to the nazis who bottled it up or shared it with a priest instead.
The left wouldn't be blamed, because they self-sabotage and would never win that fight anyway. At best they can hope for a mob, which never does a good job of targetting any enemy that poses them a threat, but does destroy any development in their own communities.
No goons are beating up queers for cornholing, but there are a lot of woke rich kids getting the baton for trespassing, blocking walkways, and demonizing jews for self-defense.
The left wants to disarm people, and the way every leftist policy is designed, it would disarm trans people for past suicide attempts, disarm the struggling men in their own ranks who are open about their anger to their therapists, and do nothing to the nazis who bottled it up or shared it with a priest instead.
The left wouldn't be blamed, because they self-sabotage and would never win that fight anyway. At best they can hope for a mob, which never does a good job of targetting any enemy that poses them a threat, but does destroy any development in their own communities.
No goons are beating up queers for cornholing, but there are a lot of woke rich kids getting the baton for trespassing, blocking walkways, and demonizing jews for self-defense.
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,840
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 18 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,843
@1,300,839 (G)
Only one US president in history has said, "Let's take the guns first and worry about due process later." Want to guess which president that was?
Only one US president in history has said, "Let's take the guns first and worry about due process later." Want to guess which president that was?
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,853
@previous (E)
He had 4 years and never did it, and everyone in the other party talks about taking the guns away seriously.
One remark from a guy who has taken both sides on every issue doesn't mean anything. The Republicans have installed judges and backed legislation that has shown what side they take on the second amendment. The Democrats have shown over and over they hold the opposing stance.
It's a cheap gotcha, no one actually thinks the right is the side trying to grab all the guns.
He had 4 years and never did it, and everyone in the other party talks about taking the guns away seriously.
One remark from a guy who has taken both sides on every issue doesn't mean anything. The Republicans have installed judges and backed legislation that has shown what side they take on the second amendment. The Democrats have shown over and over they hold the opposing stance.
It's a cheap gotcha, no one actually thinks the right is the side trying to grab all the guns.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,861
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,300,906
@previous (K)
I never said you can't say mean things about people wearing red hats.
I did say the party opposed to gun ownership isn't going to be the side with the advantage in that fight.
I never said you can't say mean things about people wearing red hats.
I did say the party opposed to gun ownership isn't going to be the side with the advantage in that fight.