Topic: Just so we're clear
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #118,238 When does new material transition to shtick?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,299,738 Whenever Meta is butthurt.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,299,741 @previous (B)
You seem obsessed with this Meta fella.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,299,742 Criteria and Descriptors
1. Content Originality
Exceptional (4): The post provides new insights, ideas, or perspectives that are unique and original.
Good (3): The post offers some originality but includes familiar ideas or perspectives.
Fair (2): The post includes mostly unoriginal content, relying on common ideas or perspectives.
Poor (1): The post is entirely unoriginal, recycling well-known or clichéd ideas.
2. Purpose and Intent
Exceptional (4): The intent is clear and purposeful, adding meaningful value to the discussion.
Good (3): The intent is mostly clear, with some valuable contributions to the discussion.
Fair (2): The intent is somewhat unclear, with limited contributions to the discussion.
Poor (1): The intent is unclear or seems primarily designed to attract attention without adding value.
3. Engagement and Interaction
Exceptional (4): The post encourages thoughtful discussion and interaction, with multiple meaningful responses.
Good (3): The post generates some discussion and interaction, with a few meaningful responses.
Fair (2): The post prompts limited interaction, with few meaningful responses.
Poor (1): The post fails to engage others in meaningful discussion or interaction.
4. Humor and Entertainment Value
Exceptional (4): The post is genuinely humorous or entertaining in a way that enhances the discussion.
Good (3): The post is somewhat humorous or entertaining, adding some positive value to the discussion.
Fair (2): The post has limited humor or entertainment value, with minimal impact on the discussion.
Poor (1): The post attempts humor or entertainment but falls flat or detracts from the discussion.
5. Relevance to Topic
Exceptional (4): The post is highly relevant and directly related to the topic being discussed.
Good (3): The post is mostly relevant but may include some tangential content.
Fair (2): The post has limited relevance and may stray off-topic.
Poor (1): The post is largely irrelevant to the topic being discussed.
Scoring
16-20: The post is likely not shtick; it provides meaningful, original, and relevant content with clear intent.
11-15: The post may contain some elements of shtick but still offers value and relevance to the discussion.
6-10: The post shows clear signs of being shtick, with limited originality, unclear intent, or minimal relevance.
1-5: The post is highly likely to be shtick, primarily designed to attract attention without adding value.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 7 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,299,770 @OP enis
when it is filtered through the sheer inanity of your extistence.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,299,777 @previous (E)
You seem very grumpy.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago , 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,299,783 @previous (A)
you seem very homosexual
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,299,800 As long as I can walk away at any point, anything goes I guess.
It's different in real life though, at least once a year I'll be stuck behind the counter and chuckles will roll up and unload his comedy routine - bro, I'm on hour 37 of this week and the finish line is right in front of me; don't fuck this up.
Eternal God Emperor Obama joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 4 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,299,835 Whenever I say it is by decree.
↕