Jorge !l6aiEdTxng joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 34 minutes later[^][v]#1,295,959
I've read books and I know that the Romans were there to harsh their buzz not long after they got back from being conquered by Babylon, so they've been going at least that long.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 week later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,297,997
the israel of the bible and the israel of today are two completely unrelated things, this is most easily demonstrated by the name that the citizens of both use. bible uses israelite, whereass todays nigger state uses israeli, as if they are afraid of completely embracing their stolen identity.
Israelites are the descendants of the children of Israel, Israel (State) contains many non-Israelites. Therefore a new term is required to include non-Israelite citizens of Israel.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,298,115
Additionally they didn't and don't use either of those terms (which are English translation) in their language.
The modern Hebrew term for citizen of Israel is יִשְׂרְאֵלִים (Yīśre'ēlīm), meaning "[This one] Belongs to Israel", and the ancient Hebrew term for "Israelite" is בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל (Banēy Yīsrā'ēl), meaning "Children of Israel".
> Israelites are the descendants of the children of Israel, Israel (State) contains many non-Israelites. Therefore a new term is required to include non-Israelite citizens of Israel.
Yep, you’ve got Palestinians, Druze, and Samaritans who all live in Israel