Topic: Absolutely delicious confrontation
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #117,812 So I'm trying to pass this guy on my truck in the banana house, thing is he's always in a bad mood so he's like "you should have asked me earlier" so I said the thing is he always says no, then I just ignored him while doing my job in front of him. He was going on and on about how I have to follow the rules like everyone else. But Stan was there and I waved and smiled at him he seemed to be way less tense as he smiled and nodded back.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,295,929 Ok
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 34 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,930 @previous (B)
It wasn't ok, ok?
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,931 @previous (A)
All I'm saying is, you made about as much sense as Biden does during a speech.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 36 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,933 Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 53 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,942 @previous (A)
It wasn't ok, ok?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,943 @previous (B)
All I'm saying is, you made about as much effort as.... someone who makes no effort
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 29 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,947 @previous (A)
Look bud, all I'm saying is, if you would have thought this out, you wouldn't of had to give it so much thought.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,949 @previous (B)
Oh I've looked, I've SEEN. The question is why can't you see that you don't see?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago , 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,952 Did he tally you banana?
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,953 @1,295,949 (A)
Oh I've looked, I didn't SEE. The question is how can I see what you see, when I can't see what you saw?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,956 @previous (B)
Oh I've seen, YOU DID SEE. The question is how can one see what they see, when one can't see what they see?
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,961 @previous (A)
Oh I see. You saw what you thought I saw. Then question is how do you know I saw what you saw?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,962 @previous (B)
Oh you see, you thought what you saw. When you saw what you thought you saw, it could be seen what was thought.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 33 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,968 @previous (A)
So, what I saw was thought, therefore, my thought was making me think I saw something only you could see.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 8 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,296,079 @previous (B)
Only so-so, what I saw wasn't what you saw and thought, but I saw the thought of what you saw.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 16 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,296,080 @previous (A)
But, the question is, if you saw the thought of what I saw, how come I can't see what you think I saw?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,296,081 @previous (B)
Well, the answer is, since I see the thought of what you saw, and see where you are seeing too, then I see both. You do not see both because it's not being seen as much as it's being thought.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,296,088 @previous (A)
Well, if I could see what you thought, then I would see what you saw. Afterwards, we can discuss what you seen.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago , 11 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,296,090 @previous (B)
Yes, if you only could see what I thought, then you could see what is to be seen instead of what is thought.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago , 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,296,098 @previous (A)
I thought I saw what you thought, but it turns out I only thought what you saw.
↕