Minichan

Topic: How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #11,772

Headline says it all

Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #211,456

A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

The Editor !FuckWtfW8M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #211,457

ALL THE WOOD. All of it.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #211,460

If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would and should chuck wood. But if woodchucks can't chuck wood, they shouldn't and wouldn't chuck wood. Though were I a woodchuck, and I chucked wood, I would chuck wood with the best woodchucks that chucked wood.

(Edited 32 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #211,461

@previous (D)
That doesn't answer my question regarding the amounts of wood a woodchuck would chuck if the woodchuck could chuck wood

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #211,463

@previous (A)
Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation.

C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3 units of wood.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 11 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #211,464

@previous (D)
I'm sorry, but chuck norris' constant would clearly be 2

Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #211,465

They would chuck wood with the force of a thousand suns. Since suns are especially good at dealing with wood, they would be able to chuck dickloads of wood with a single peck.

hamfist !!snnYcROO9 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #211,468

unlimited shitfucks

orc !WBRXcNtpf. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #211,569

How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? Why, as much as he can!
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.