Topic: Leftists: what happens when your government healthcare monopoly is pro-genocide?
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #117,653
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/30/nhs-sex-biological-landmark-shift-against-gender-ideology/
Brits have no right to reallocate their healthcare premiums to a competitor like the free people in USAmerica, they are forced to contribute to the state-backed monopoly regardless of quality.
Do you see any positives to the free marketplace in situations like this, or are you in favor of genocide?
Brits have no right to reallocate their healthcare premiums to a competitor like the free people in USAmerica, they are forced to contribute to the state-backed monopoly regardless of quality.
Do you see any positives to the free marketplace in situations like this, or are you in favor of genocide?
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #1,294,811
Typical right winger. Freedom is important until someone wants to do a genocide
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,294,824
Jorge !l6aiEdTxng joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,294,834
What healthcare premiums do the British pay? Here in the Amazon jungle, we source our medicine traditionally and our shaman applies remedies and poultices for free.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 23 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,294,836
The U.S. government never gave two flying fucks about giving the public good healthcare.
So, this doesn't mean shit.
So, this doesn't mean shit.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,294,837
If you accumulate medical debt after a few years they eventually just stop calling so idgaf
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,119
@1,294,836 (D)
In the US you don't have to worry about a state monopoly making bad healthcare decisions because you can pick the private entity you like best.
In the UK you must pay for the NHS even if they want to genocide you. If you want an alternative, you must pay a second time.
In the US you don't have to worry about a state monopoly making bad healthcare decisions because you can pick the private entity you like best.
In the UK you must pay for the NHS even if they want to genocide you. If you want an alternative, you must pay a second time.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,123
@previous (A)
> In the US
> you don't have to worry about a state monopoly making bad healthcare decisions
We just have to worry about a corporation that thinks it knows about healthcare.
> because you can pick the private entity you like best
You act like this is a common thing for 75% of Americans. This is really only for those who are rich.
> In the UK you must pay for the NHS
Okay.
> even if they want to genocide you
Elaborate more on this please?
> If you want an alternative, you must pay a second time.
So, basically sounds like the United States, where the rich pay for better medical insurance that allows for better access to doctors, nurses, procedures, etc. While the rest of America either has to go without or settle for shitty insurances via the Affordable Care Act.
> In the US
> you don't have to worry about a state monopoly making bad healthcare decisions
We just have to worry about a corporation that thinks it knows about healthcare.
> because you can pick the private entity you like best
You act like this is a common thing for 75% of Americans. This is really only for those who are rich.
> In the UK you must pay for the NHS
Okay.
> even if they want to genocide you
Elaborate more on this please?
> If you want an alternative, you must pay a second time.
So, basically sounds like the United States, where the rich pay for better medical insurance that allows for better access to doctors, nurses, procedures, etc. While the rest of America either has to go without or settle for shitty insurances via the Affordable Care Act.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,128
@previous (D)
> > In the US
> > you don't have to worry about a state monopoly making bad healthcare decisions
> We just have to worry about a corporation that thinks it knows about healthcare.
If you disagree, switch companies.
> > because you can pick the private entity you like best
> You act like this is a common thing for 75% of Americans. This is really only for those who are rich.
No, many more people can shop between plans on the healthcare marketplace.
> > In the UK you must pay for the NHS
> Okay.
> > even if they want to genocide you
> Elaborate more on this please?
NHS won't give lifesaving care to young transfolx.
> > If you want an alternative, you must pay a second time.
> So, basically sounds like the United States, where the rich pay for better medical insurance that allows for better access to doctors, nurses, procedures, etc. While the rest of America either has to go without or settle for shitty insurances via the Affordable Care Act.
No, that's not the same because you don't have to pay twice in America.
Disliking the options for companies is an entirely different problem than being forced to pay for one of those companies.
> > In the US
> > you don't have to worry about a state monopoly making bad healthcare decisions
> We just have to worry about a corporation that thinks it knows about healthcare.
If you disagree, switch companies.
> > because you can pick the private entity you like best
> You act like this is a common thing for 75% of Americans. This is really only for those who are rich.
No, many more people can shop between plans on the healthcare marketplace.
> > In the UK you must pay for the NHS
> Okay.
> > even if they want to genocide you
> Elaborate more on this please?
NHS won't give lifesaving care to young transfolx.
> > If you want an alternative, you must pay a second time.
> So, basically sounds like the United States, where the rich pay for better medical insurance that allows for better access to doctors, nurses, procedures, etc. While the rest of America either has to go without or settle for shitty insurances via the Affordable Care Act.
No, that's not the same because you don't have to pay twice in America.
Disliking the options for companies is an entirely different problem than being forced to pay for one of those companies.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,141
@previous (A)
“Whatever changes are eventually introduced following the consultation need to be clear and workable for NHS staff, who should not expect to have to interpret ambiguous guidance at a local level.”
The eight-week consultation will be the first stage of a review of the constitution.
The Government will consider responses from everyone, including the public, clinicians and medical professionals, patients, carers and organisations representing patients and staff and health stakeholders, before publishing the consultation response and the new NHS constitution.
The eight-week consultation will be the first stage of a review of the constitution.
The Government will consider responses from everyone, including the public, clinicians and medical professionals, patients, carers and organisations representing patients and staff and health stakeholders, before publishing the consultation response and the new NHS constitution.
Anonymous F double-posted this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,148
@1,295,128 (A)
> > You act like this is a common thing for 75% of Americans. This is really only for those who are rich.
> No, many more people can shop between plans on the healthcare marketplace.
There are 3 options: 1. Be so very poor that you can claim medicare benefits (or your state's equivalent), 2. Try to earn a proper living, lose access to government benefits and pay for your own healthcare, while also being taxed to subsidize the impoverished's "health insurance plans" and maybe (just maybe) get a small tax credit towards your "marketplace approved" "insurance plan", or 3. Be "rich", choose your own doctor and also pay taxes to subsidize other people's "health insurance plans"
> No, that's not the same because you don't have to pay twice in America.
Yes, you do.
Also nothing in the ACA "marketplace" is healthcare, it's "insurance".
> > You act like this is a common thing for 75% of Americans. This is really only for those who are rich.
> No, many more people can shop between plans on the healthcare marketplace.
There are 3 options: 1. Be so very poor that you can claim medicare benefits (or your state's equivalent), 2. Try to earn a proper living, lose access to government benefits and pay for your own healthcare, while also being taxed to subsidize the impoverished's "health insurance plans" and maybe (just maybe) get a small tax credit towards your "marketplace approved" "insurance plan", or 3. Be "rich", choose your own doctor and also pay taxes to subsidize other people's "health insurance plans"
> No, that's not the same because you don't have to pay twice in America.
Yes, you do.
Also nothing in the ACA "marketplace" is healthcare, it's "insurance".
(Edited 15 minutes later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,295,150
@OP
> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/30/nhs-sex-biological-landmark-shift-against-gender-ideology/
>
> Brits have no right to reallocate their healthcare premiums to a competitor like the free people in USAmerica, they are forced to contribute to the state-backed monopoly regardless of quality.
>
> Do you see any positives to the free marketplace in situations like this, or are you in favor of genocide?
i continue to not give a fuck because you can still be a leftist and not support terrorism, and the best part is it will still cause you fuckers to cry
> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/30/nhs-sex-biological-landmark-shift-against-gender-ideology/
>
> Brits have no right to reallocate their healthcare premiums to a competitor like the free people in USAmerica, they are forced to contribute to the state-backed monopoly regardless of quality.
>
> Do you see any positives to the free marketplace in situations like this, or are you in favor of genocide?
i continue to not give a fuck because you can still be a leftist and not support terrorism, and the best part is it will still cause you fuckers to cry
