Topic: Which do you consider the most reliable news source? Reuters, Fox, BBC, CNN or...
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #117,334
...some knob-head on the internet?
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,292,380
I get all my news from OP. I don't trust anyone else. <3
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,381
Minichan News Network... Accurate, top news all the time!boof joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 14 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,385
a good rule of thumb is, the more it looks boring to children, the more legit it might be
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 17 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,389
i get my news from BET
Indie the Grate joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 18 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,472
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,473
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,474
Minichan is the most useful because it has multiple points of view... If I look between the views of people Fake anon, Svet, Bert, Kook, and so on, I must just get a glimpse at the truth...
(Edited 6 seconds later.)
boof replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,518
@1,292,473 (G)
is it possible for a news station to not be owned/run by someone active for specific political party influences? I would prefer that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Marshall_(investor)
is it possible for a news station to not be owned/run by someone active for specific political party influences? I would prefer that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Marshall_(investor)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,528
So, only one vote for some knob-head?
Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,531
Erik !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,547
@1,292,473 (G)
> Unironically a good station.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-MF_EqLQx60&pp=ygUSZ2IgbmV3cyBnb25lIHdyb25n
> Unironically a good station.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-MF_EqLQx60&pp=ygUSZ2IgbmV3cyBnb25lIHdyb25n
Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,551
@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Seems like a good lad having a laugh making the news. Sorry that soyboy video OP didn't like that.
Seems like a good lad having a laugh making the news. Sorry that soyboy video OP didn't like that.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,552
I’m the tax maaaan
boof replied with this 2 weeks ago, 14 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,588
@1,292,531 (G)
> Most people support a political party
lol no, not to the point of joining, working, and promoting it
I want better from a fucking general news station meant for the wide general public
> Most people support a political party
lol no, not to the point of joining, working, and promoting it
I want better from a fucking general news station meant for the wide general public
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,599
@previous (boof)
Very many people have joined a political party, and even more people support and even promote the policies of the party they support.
That the owner supports a political party isn't the condemnation you think it is. It's perfectly normal to do so.
Very many people have joined a political party, and even more people support and even promote the policies of the party they support.
That the owner supports a political party isn't the condemnation you think it is. It's perfectly normal to do so.
boof replied with this 2 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,644
@previous (G)
It is extremely problematic when the balance of power is with the one who has the money, power, and reach to deliver news. We have seen this all over the world with fewer and fewer independent news media giving way to a small number of politically affiliated companies.
It is extremely problematic when the balance of power is with the one who has the money, power, and reach to deliver news. We have seen this all over the world with fewer and fewer independent news media giving way to a small number of politically affiliated companies.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,657
@previous (boof)
It costs a lot of money to operate a TV station, therefore the TV station news is owned by the people who have money. I don't think that it is problematic for somebody to have political opinions, no matter the size of their bank balance. Especially in the modern age of citizenship media, where broadsheets and broadcasts have less monopoly on the news.
It costs a lot of money to operate a TV station, therefore the TV station news is owned by the people who have money. I don't think that it is problematic for somebody to have political opinions, no matter the size of their bank balance. Especially in the modern age of citizenship media, where broadsheets and broadcasts have less monopoly on the news.
boof replied with this 2 weeks ago, 43 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,661
Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 53 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,662
boof replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,756
@previous (G)
well it is a more recent phenomenon than the introduction of television -- more so the proliferation of cable (then satellite) entertainment stations making viewers think that they are getting a lot of news, when really the number of different stories is not much, and the programming day has glorified talk radio shitheads talking loard knows what
as for social media, I just don't use it but from I have heard, bad actors and public relations firms game that shit and make people retarded
well it is a more recent phenomenon than the introduction of television -- more so the proliferation of cable (then satellite) entertainment stations making viewers think that they are getting a lot of news, when really the number of different stories is not much, and the programming day has glorified talk radio shitheads talking loard knows what
as for social media, I just don't use it but from I have heard, bad actors and public relations firms game that shit and make people retarded
(Edited 2 minutes later.)