Topic: I have made this thread a hundred times.
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #117,326
Why won’t she come back? 😭
(Edited 14 hours later by a moderator.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 51 minutes later[^] [v] #1,292,293
The skills you use in a biology lab are not the same skills you need to evaluate the psychological and economic impacts of a complete societal shutdown, or the long-term effects they will have on that society.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,294
I knows more than them pandemic experts!!!Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 38 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,297
Matt knows more than any of us forum users. He got his degree from a online university.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,301
A grubworm knows more than Fauci.
Jami !!1fFjfSYjI joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 23 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,302
Let me guess, you live in a Blue state?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,304
@previous (Jami !!1fFjfSYjI)
If Op is Matt, he does not live in a blue state
Also this is a weird thing to try and guess
If Op is Matt, he does not live in a blue state
Also this is a weird thing to try and guess
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,309
"i dont need no doctor to tell me wuts gud for me!!" - dipshit maga faggots before they die 4 seconds later of a preventable illness
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 48 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,313
At least Pfizer has owned up to their bullshit and trying to apologize to save face and their reputation. Fauci, pffft he has run off and hid.
Pfizer is fucked!
https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/media/cwvkqvyz/3741-case-report-28-march-2024.pdf
Pfizer is fucked!
https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/media/cwvkqvyz/3741-case-report-28-march-2024.pdf
Anonymous H replied with this 1 year ago, 53 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,325
@previous (E)
> At least Pfizer has owned up to their bullshit and trying to apologize to save face and their reputation. Fauci, pffft he has run off and hid.
>
> Pfizer is fucked!
> https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/media/cwvkqvyz/3741-case-report-28-march-2024.pdf
not clicking that cp link
> At least Pfizer has owned up to their bullshit and trying to apologize to save face and their reputation. Fauci, pffft he has run off and hid.
>
> Pfizer is fucked!
> https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/media/cwvkqvyz/3741-case-report-28-march-2024.pdf
not clicking that cp link
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,327
@1,292,313 (E)
lol did you even read the lawsuit? It's about explicit stories the French teacher was writing about his students.
lol did you even read the lawsuit? It's about explicit stories the French teacher was writing about his students.
(Edited 3 hours later by a moderator.)
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,330
@previous (A)
And it is very obvious to those who have read it that you haven't. Here let's outline it out for you and anyone else who hasn't the attention span to actually read the whole document. Also dumbass I NEVER said anything about the vaccine HARMING people now did I? Oh but that is your cry out!!! Just read the whole document or at least this outline from it. And then try and stay on topic.
Senior executives used social media to promote an “unlicensed” Covid vaccine.
Pfizer found to have breached the regulatory code five times,
Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA)
Pharmaceutical watchdog,
relates to a complaint about a message posted on twitter
November 2020 by senior Pfizer employees.
COMPLAINT
the complainant alleged that it turned out that such misbehaviour was even more widespread than they had thought, extended right to the top of their UK operation and was apparently continuing to this very day.
PANEL RULING
The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that on further investigation into this complaint four other Pfizer UK colleagues, including another senior colleague in the UK organization, had re-tweeted the same post.
The Panel queried whether a social media platform, such as Twitter was the appropriate forum to share such information.
The Panel noted the tweet contained limited information regarding the efficacy of the vaccine candidate with no safety information provided.
On the balance of probabilities, it was likely that the Pfizer UK employee’s connections would include UK members of the public as well as UK health professionals.
The Panel noted that the tweet clearly referred to the outcome of the Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine being developed to protect against COVID-19.
The Panel noted that Clause 3.1 prohibited the promotion of a medicine prior to the grant of its marketing authorisation.
They must not mislead either directly or by implication, by distortion, exaggeration or undue emphasis. Material must be sufficiently complete to enable the recipient to form their own opinion of the therapeutic value of the medicine.
It must not be stated that a product has no adverse reactions, toxic hazards or risks of addiction or dependency. The Panel noted the tweet made no reference to adverse events and was therefore concerned that important safety information relating to the vaccine candidate was not provided and ruled a breach of Clause 7.9 of the 2019 Code as acknowledged by Pfizer.
The Panel noted Pfizer stated that the senior employee whose re-tweet was the subject of this complaint had completed the social media training module in October 2019.
Activity which was clearly outside of company policy had not been taken down or deleted.
‘Unlicensed medicine proactively disseminated’
“unlicensed medicine being proactively disseminated on Twitter to health professions and members of the public in the UK”.
Pfizer UK spokesman
“fully recognizes and accepts the issues highlighted by this PMCPA ruling”,
“deeply sorry”.
Pfizer
‘Accidental and unintentional’
Sixth time Pfizer has been reprimanded by the regulator over its promotion of the Covid-19 vaccine.
Ben Kingsley, UsForThem
“It’s astonishing how many times Pfizer’s senior executives have been found guilty of serious regulatory offences – in this case including the most serious offence of all under the UK Code of Practice.
“Yet the consequences for Pfizer and the individuals concerned continue to be derisory. This hopeless system of regulation for a multi-billion dollar life and death industry has become a sham, in dire need of reform.”
And it is very obvious to those who have read it that you haven't. Here let's outline it out for you and anyone else who hasn't the attention span to actually read the whole document. Also dumbass I NEVER said anything about the vaccine HARMING people now did I? Oh but that is your cry out!!! Just read the whole document or at least this outline from it. And then try and stay on topic.
Senior executives used social media to promote an “unlicensed” Covid vaccine.
Pfizer found to have breached the regulatory code five times,
Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA)
Pharmaceutical watchdog,
relates to a complaint about a message posted on twitter
November 2020 by senior Pfizer employees.
COMPLAINT
the complainant alleged that it turned out that such misbehaviour was even more widespread than they had thought, extended right to the top of their UK operation and was apparently continuing to this very day.
PANEL RULING
The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that on further investigation into this complaint four other Pfizer UK colleagues, including another senior colleague in the UK organization, had re-tweeted the same post.
The Panel queried whether a social media platform, such as Twitter was the appropriate forum to share such information.
The Panel noted the tweet contained limited information regarding the efficacy of the vaccine candidate with no safety information provided.
On the balance of probabilities, it was likely that the Pfizer UK employee’s connections would include UK members of the public as well as UK health professionals.
The Panel noted that the tweet clearly referred to the outcome of the Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine being developed to protect against COVID-19.
The Panel noted that Clause 3.1 prohibited the promotion of a medicine prior to the grant of its marketing authorisation.
They must not mislead either directly or by implication, by distortion, exaggeration or undue emphasis. Material must be sufficiently complete to enable the recipient to form their own opinion of the therapeutic value of the medicine.
It must not be stated that a product has no adverse reactions, toxic hazards or risks of addiction or dependency. The Panel noted the tweet made no reference to adverse events and was therefore concerned that important safety information relating to the vaccine candidate was not provided and ruled a breach of Clause 7.9 of the 2019 Code as acknowledged by Pfizer.
The Panel noted Pfizer stated that the senior employee whose re-tweet was the subject of this complaint had completed the social media training module in October 2019.
Activity which was clearly outside of company policy had not been taken down or deleted.
‘Unlicensed medicine proactively disseminated’
“unlicensed medicine being proactively disseminated on Twitter to health professions and members of the public in the UK”.
Pfizer UK spokesman
“fully recognizes and accepts the issues highlighted by this PMCPA ruling”,
“deeply sorry”.
Pfizer
‘Accidental and unintentional’
Sixth time Pfizer has been reprimanded by the regulator over its promotion of the Covid-19 vaccine.
Ben Kingsley, UsForThem
“It’s astonishing how many times Pfizer’s senior executives have been found guilty of serious regulatory offences – in this case including the most serious offence of all under the UK Code of Practice.
“Yet the consequences for Pfizer and the individuals concerned continue to be derisory. This hopeless system of regulation for a multi-billion dollar life and death industry has become a sham, in dire need of reform.”
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,333
@previous (E)
So they promoted a medicine that had not yet been approved. That's illegal and wrong, but it has nothing to do with your believe that vaccines harm people and that the COVID vaccine does not work, or whatever stupid conspiracy bullshit you believe.
So they promoted a medicine that had not yet been approved. That's illegal and wrong, but it has nothing to do with your believe that vaccines harm people and that the COVID vaccine does not work, or whatever stupid conspiracy bullshit you believe.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,335
@previous (A)
> So they promoted a medicine that had not yet been approved. That's illegal and wrong, but it has nothing to do with your believe that vaccines harm people and that the COVID vaccine does not work, or whatever stupid conspiracy bullshit you believe.
Where in the hell did I say it harms people??? Where? Conspiracy...sorry this is just facts you seem to try and take off topic and brush aside. I am saying here that this vaccine was rolled out to people by Pfizer illegally. And Fauci pushed it on the American people knowing it had not been fully tested to be safe. Was it safe? That is for you to decide for yourself. But at the time it was rolled out it was not licensed to be deemed safe!!
> So they promoted a medicine that had not yet been approved. That's illegal and wrong, but it has nothing to do with your believe that vaccines harm people and that the COVID vaccine does not work, or whatever stupid conspiracy bullshit you believe.
Where in the hell did I say it harms people??? Where? Conspiracy...sorry this is just facts you seem to try and take off topic and brush aside. I am saying here that this vaccine was rolled out to people by Pfizer illegally. And Fauci pushed it on the American people knowing it had not been fully tested to be safe. Was it safe? That is for you to decide for yourself. But at the time it was rolled out it was not licensed to be deemed safe!!
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,338
@1,292,333 (A)
You seem a bit out of control here and are looking a bit upset. You should shut up before you really start looking like the out of control fool you just might be.
You seem a bit out of control here and are looking a bit upset. You should shut up before you really start looking like the out of control fool you just might be.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,340
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,342
@previous (A)
I don't know. But even if it did, I think that the people should have been warned that this was an unlicensed drug, and that there could be adverse reactions to this medicine.
Now my question to you is. Why ask me a question? You just got done calling me a dunce, said I didn't read this document or understand it, and that I believe conspiracy bullshit. Maybe you should quit asking me questions and learn to do some serious research on your own.
I don't know. But even if it did, I think that the people should have been warned that this was an unlicensed drug, and that there could be adverse reactions to this medicine.
Now my question to you is. Why ask me a question? You just got done calling me a dunce, said I didn't read this document or understand it, and that I believe conspiracy bullshit. Maybe you should quit asking me questions and learn to do some serious research on your own.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,343
@previous (E)
People were warned. they clearly said that it was an emergency authorization from the FDA. I had to sign a long form to get it. It was on all the news stations.
People were warned. they clearly said that it was an emergency authorization from the FDA. I had to sign a long form to get it. It was on all the news stations.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,355
@previous (A)
People were warned about what? If this was so cut and dried and on the up and up it still seems fishy that Pfizer is fighting their 6th lawsuit over this. And apologizing publicly about withholding this vital information. You taking the vaccine makes no matter mind to me. I have seen no documentation on emergency authorization. I would not have cared about what the news said because I'm not to comfortable with how they report information over the last 10 years. They sure didn't report this medicine was unlicensed or mention the adverse side effects.
""The PMCPA had previously used the phrase ‘unique circumstances’ to describe the
conditions prevailing during the pandemic as an excuse to mitigate findings against
Pfizer. The complainant’s response had been to say that in such circumstances the
public had a right to expect higher, not lower, standards from the pharmaceutical
industry. This case illustrated yet again, not only the low standards prevailing at that
time, but when viewed in the context of the previous findings against Pfizer,
suggested a determined, coordinated and concerted effort to use the internet and
social media to actively promote their covid vaccine misleadingly and in advance of
the issue of any license or approval.""
The FDA may have authorized it, but they did not approve it! Taking a drug that is not FDA approved to me isn't a very good idea. Just my opinion of course.
People were warned about what? If this was so cut and dried and on the up and up it still seems fishy that Pfizer is fighting their 6th lawsuit over this. And apologizing publicly about withholding this vital information. You taking the vaccine makes no matter mind to me. I have seen no documentation on emergency authorization. I would not have cared about what the news said because I'm not to comfortable with how they report information over the last 10 years. They sure didn't report this medicine was unlicensed or mention the adverse side effects.
""The PMCPA had previously used the phrase ‘unique circumstances’ to describe the
conditions prevailing during the pandemic as an excuse to mitigate findings against
Pfizer. The complainant’s response had been to say that in such circumstances the
public had a right to expect higher, not lower, standards from the pharmaceutical
industry. This case illustrated yet again, not only the low standards prevailing at that
time, but when viewed in the context of the previous findings against Pfizer,
suggested a determined, coordinated and concerted effort to use the internet and
social media to actively promote their covid vaccine misleadingly and in advance of
the issue of any license or approval.""
The FDA may have authorized it, but they did not approve it! Taking a drug that is not FDA approved to me isn't a very good idea. Just my opinion of course.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,356
@previous (E)
I'm just saying that it was clearly stated that it was an FDA emergency authorization to get it out more quickly.
I'm just saying that it was clearly stated that it was an FDA emergency authorization to get it out more quickly.
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,359
@previous (A)
And I'm saying I think that was a very bad idea for them to do that. And Fauci was leading the people into it. Now with the lawsuits starting to surface he is nowhere to be found and keeps his mouth shut. And I don't blame him.
As far as you go, look back up at the posts and see what you called me. Maybe you should pull your head out of your ass and pay more attention when someone speaks. Because now all you can say is
> it was clearly stated that it was an FDA emergency authorization to get it out more quickly.
Which again has nothing to do with what I posted about Pfizer lawsuit and Fauci earlier. But it's all you could bring to the table in a discussion besides calling me every name in the book.
And I'm saying I think that was a very bad idea for them to do that. And Fauci was leading the people into it. Now with the lawsuits starting to surface he is nowhere to be found and keeps his mouth shut. And I don't blame him.
As far as you go, look back up at the posts and see what you called me. Maybe you should pull your head out of your ass and pay more attention when someone speaks. Because now all you can say is
> it was clearly stated that it was an FDA emergency authorization to get it out more quickly.
Which again has nothing to do with what I posted about Pfizer lawsuit and Fauci earlier. But it's all you could bring to the table in a discussion besides calling me every name in the book.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,360
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,398
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,426
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,431
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,508
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 9 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,544
@1,292,335 (E)
> > So they promoted a medicine that had not yet been approved. That's illegal and wrong, but it has nothing to do with your believe that vaccines harm people and that the COVID vaccine does not work, or whatever stupid conspiracy bullshit you believe.
>
> Where in the hell did I say it harms people??? Where? Conspiracy...sorry this is just facts you seem to try and take off topic and brush aside. I am saying here that this vaccine was rolled out to people by Pfizer illegally. And Fauci pushed it on the American people knowing it had not been fully tested to be safe. Was it safe? That is for you to decide for yourself. But at the time it was rolled out it was not licensed to be deemed safe!!
Shut up you mentally ill faggot
> > So they promoted a medicine that had not yet been approved. That's illegal and wrong, but it has nothing to do with your believe that vaccines harm people and that the COVID vaccine does not work, or whatever stupid conspiracy bullshit you believe.
>
> Where in the hell did I say it harms people??? Where? Conspiracy...sorry this is just facts you seem to try and take off topic and brush aside. I am saying here that this vaccine was rolled out to people by Pfizer illegally. And Fauci pushed it on the American people knowing it had not been fully tested to be safe. Was it safe? That is for you to decide for yourself. But at the time it was rolled out it was not licensed to be deemed safe!!
Shut up you mentally ill faggot
(Edited 16 seconds later.)