Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Topic: Why you assholes still using proprietary software bullshit?
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago#11,707
Seriously, WTF? I could understand when Linux was a joke, but now it does 80%+ of all Windows can do. And it does it with greater security and greater stability provided you pick a decent distro. WTF? I don't get it. Do you want your children to be Borg?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,800
@210,797 (B)
Not F/OSS dumbass. Either your an idiot or an asshole.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,803
@previous (A)
I'm just an asshole who supports their freedom to withhold their source code.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,805
@previous (B)
So you'll gladly sacrifice your own freedoms to enrich others? Congratulations, you'll never be an Alpha male.
And BTW, Opera sucks! Not only is it functionally unnecessary, but politically irrelevant as well. Enjoy your nothing special!
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,808
@previous (A)
They have the freedom to do as they wish with their source code. This is not much different than buying a closed-source Coca-Cola. They have the right to keep their source code a secret (as they have no jurisdiction in the US, given the fact that Opera HQ resides in Norway). > And BTW, Opera sucks!
Cool opinion, bro. > Not only is it functionally unnecessary, but politically irrelevant as well.
Just like GNU Hurd.
Also, it works best on my Netbook, since open-source developers are incompetent and don't know how to optimize their code for low-power devices.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,809
@previous (B)
The question isn't about Opera. It's about you motherfucker. Why are YOU using proprietary software when it is not necessary to do so?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,810
@previous (A)
Why are YOU using open-source software when it is not necessary to do so?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,811
Clearly you have no grip on reality. Open-source developers consistently do more with less. That's far from incompetent.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,812
@210,809 (A) > The question isn't about Opera.
But your blind hate-filled attacks are. > Why are YOU using proprietary software when it is not necessary to do so?
Because I can.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 second later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,813
@210,810 (E)
Principle. It's a very simple concept once you get it.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,814
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,816
@210,811 (A) > Open-source developers consistently do more with less.
Is that why Opera uses LESS disk space than Firefox on install EVEN WITH all its bundled features? Or is that why Opera consistently uses LESS of my memory AND CPU even on JS-heavy Web sites (4chan with 4chan X)?
Anonymous B double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,819
@210,814 (A)
It's definitely better than using software from a foundation that was created by a mentally-handicapped and delusional marxist pedophile.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,820
@210,816 (B)
Dude, pretending Opera's good isn't going to get you anywhere with me. It's fucking invisible. It only has 2% of the market for fuck sakes. It's a God damn also-ran. No, in fact it's worse than an also ran, it's the fucking down-syndrome kid trying to run a race with fully functional athletes. Tell me you love Opera all you want. It's like telling me the nerdy girl in high school is hot. I just don't fucking care. That bitch is still ugly to me.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,821
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,824
@210,820 (A) > It's fucking invisible. It only has 2% of the market for fuck sakes. > popularity = good
Is that why CoDMW2 is the Greatest FPS ever made? Is that why /b/ is the best board on 4chan? Your logical fallacy won't work on me. > it's the fucking down-syndrome kid trying to run a race with fully functional athletes.
You trying to argue with me is like a fucking down-syndrome kid trying to run a race with fully functional athletes. > It's like telling me the nerdy girl in high school is hot. I just don't fucking care. That bitch is still ugly to me.
Like you wouldn't hit it, you desperate fuck.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,825
> now it does 80%+ of all Windows can do
Because most of the stuff I do falls into the other 20%
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,826
> Like you wouldn't hit it, you desperate fuck.
You really should try telling a woman NO once in your pathetic life. You'll come to find she'll only want you more. Maybe you'll learn something about what women really want.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,827
@previous (A)
What women really want: FOSS zealots.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,829
He skipped over my mentioning of games. Odd.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,830
@210,827 (B)
Women want men of principle. It matters not to them what the principle is, only that you have the balls to stand up for it.
Hear my words and enjoy pussy for life. Deny them and feel the bitter sting of rejection.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,832
@210,829 (E)
Obviously games on Linux suck. I'm not fucking retarded. I know what reality is. But games are a necessary sacrifice. Consoles are better for games anyway.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,833
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,834
@210,832 (A) > Consoles are better for games anyway.
You just blew your cover, troll.
Now you definitely won't be taken seriously.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,837
@210,832 (A) > Consoles are better for games anyway.
Consoles are the epitome of what you are against: closed-source proprietary wall gardens. And here I thought I was having a discussion with a "man of principles".
brie !OudrPWaUDQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 56 minutes after the original post[^][v]#210,838
PS3HASNOGAEMS
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#210,839
@210,837 (B)
Of course consoles are proprietary bullshit. But there is a difference between using proprietary bullshit for entertainment and trusting your most personal information to proprietary bullshit.
The Editor !FuckWtfW8M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#210,844
> this entire thread
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#210,864
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linuxâ€, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux†distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.
r04r joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,065
@OP
Simpler to use, more programs for it for non-power users. Of course if everyone would suddenly switch to unix systems these problems would solve themselves over time but most people don't like making that step or feel like it lasts too long.
Short story shorter, troll elsewhere k?
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,250
Open source can't into games. I refuse to sacrifice high quality PC gaming on a computer I built for shitty low quality console versions with shitty controls.
If linux could run battle field 3 and starcraft 2 on ultra settings, then maybe I'd be interested. Also, why do you want to trust your most personal information to strangers and ametures? Seems stupid. At least windows has some accountability. Do the programers of linux have the same level of personal responsibility when it comes to what they code?
I'll buy windows, at least I know what I'm getting. I'm not a computer scientist, so, I'll let the computer scientists handle it for me. I'll even pay them money because their work is worth it.
But fuck linux, i'm not trying to run a server.
dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,252
i don't pay attention to licences when i choose my software
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,253
@previous (dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46)
Do you just scroll down and click "accept" like I do? :')
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,255
Because proprietary software is inherently superior.
Anonymous P replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,258
@previous (Q)
It really is, windows 7 is pretty damn great, I gotta say. Fuck loads better than Vista, I can't believe it took me so long to upgrade from XP.
Oh, and does anyone even know of any open source games? Or are all the best games, just like operating systems, all closed source?
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,262
dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46 double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,264
@211,258 (P)
yeah i know of one open source crossplatform shooter, but it's utter shit, if you want classic-style jrpg's there's a bunch of them though
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,268
@211,258 (P)
Actually, Windows is a pretty poor example. 7 is probably the first version that was usable without a service pack.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous P replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,274
@previous (Q) > implying mac is an alternative for gaming
Windows is stable if you're not a stupid shit about it. Vista was just clunky and buggy. 7 is stable as fuck. I've only been able to make it crash once, and that was while benchmarking an overclock during a torture test (3.4 - 4.4 ghz) and that was totally my fault because I wasn't being terrible cautious. And thought it was a good idea to take a screen cap. It was not a good idea.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#211,279