Topic: King of Netherlands makes cruel dig at recovering Princess Kate after her photoshop drama

dw !p9hU6ckyqw started this discussion 1 year ago #116,885

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/26716949/king-willem-netherlands-cruel-dig-princess-kate-photoshop-drama/

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,289,291

Calling her a "malingering cunt" is very harsh. I didn't expect that from the Dutch king.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,293

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
I am 100% certain Willem does not know what malingering means

boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,315

an alternative translating reads "fucking cunt"

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 12 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,396

What was the original Dutch and can you translate it DreamWorks?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,421

@previous (D)
The translation is accurate

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,423

King Willem-Alexander leaves royal fans in stitches as he pokes fun at Kensington Palace over Kate's Mother's Day editing gaffe

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13202545/Moment-King-Willem-Alexander-Netherlands-leaves-royal-fans-stitches-pokes-fun-Kensington-Palace-Kate-Middletons-Mothers-Day-editing-gaffe-jokes-family-portrait-wasnt-Photoshopped.html

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,431

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

> King Willem-Alexander leaves royal fans in stitches

Couldn't believe it when he shanked that old woman with the Union Jack scarf. I didn't expect that from the Dutch king.

Erik !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,432

Funny that an irrelevant king needs to name drop to get any press.

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 28 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,438

@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Irrelevant kings are the saddest of all 21st century kings.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,478

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
What king?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,589

@1,289,432 (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Doesn't namedrop imply that he used a name

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,591

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Don't make me break out the "idiot" shtick again.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,592

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
What shtick?

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,594

@previous (G)
Precisely!

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 43 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,600

@1,289,591 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Do you find a lot of people care about what schtick you bring out

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,601

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Punctuate, my dear boy. We've been over this.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,603

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
why are you so selective in your punctuation standards

Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 49 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,606

@1,289,601 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Punctuate what?

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,608

@previous (G)
Anon G's mother is.

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc double-posted this 1 year ago, 25 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,609

@1,289,603 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
My dear boy, punctuate. We've been over this.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,612

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
We've been over what?

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 58 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,619

@previous (H)
Precisely!

Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,620

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Precisely what?

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,621

@previous (G)
Anon G's mother is.

Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,622

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Your mom is what?

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,624

@previous (G)
A fine and elegant lady. Bless you for the conversation friend! I shall now bid you ciao :)

Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,626

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> A fat and ugly lady. I shall now bid you ciao

Hahaha

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 54 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,632

@previous (G)
:)

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,708

@1,289,609 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Lazy

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,709

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Lui

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 48 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,710

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Liever lui dan moe?

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,712

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Zuig aan mijn zweterige ballenzak.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,714

@1,289,708 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

How could you say that?

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,718

@previous (I)
His wickedness observes no boundary.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,721

@1,289,712 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Gaat heb je Tourettes ofzo

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,289,991

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Wees stipt, mijn beste jongen. We hebben dit besproken.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 8 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,020

@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Stipt voor wat jij staatsmongool

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,029

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Onleesbaar gebrabbel.

Minichan