Topic: Merrin here. The Pet Sematary prequel is nowhere near as shite as people say.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc started this discussion 1 year ago #116,815
Just watched it. Here's the thing: if you've read the book and liked it, you'll like most things about this film, because the best thing in the book is the character of Judd Crandall, the old geezer who befriends Louis Creed (and played wonderfully by Fred Gwynne in the first film adaptation). In the book Judd hints at an incident that happened to him as a kid that showed him the evil that exists beyond the Pet Sematary. Well, this film is basically that story. It follows Judd Crandall as a teenager and the 'Timmy Baterman' saga that is only teased in the novel.I think the shitty reviews come from the fact that if you've not read the novel or seen either of the films, you won't really have a clue what's going on here. The movie assumes you're already well versed in the original story and its characters.
It's well directed by a first time director who has only one other writing credit to her name, some Netflix thing I'd never heard of. The acting is very uneven but that's common with first timers who are sometimes afraid to tell an established actor they've done a bad take and need to do it again. There are small parts for David Duchovny and an unrecognisable Pam Greer. The last 20 minutes is dull slasher fare that lets down a far more interesting first hour.
Worth watching for fans of King's book and Mary Lambert's 1989 film.
6/10
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 23 minutes later[^] [v] #1,288,619
shut up faggot
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,620
> how many kids have you fucked
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 21 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,625
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,626
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 31 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,627
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,629
@1,288,625 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You're so weird for this
I tried to keep the sick pedophile bastards contained to Tinychan where they belong but unfortunately they followed me over here.
> You're so weird for this
I tried to keep the sick pedophile bastards contained to Tinychan where they belong but unfortunately they followed me over here.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,631
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,632
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 44 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,633
@1,288,629 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
You shouldn't pretend to be tgcomix. It encourages other people to be perverts
You shouldn't pretend to be tgcomix. It encourages other people to be perverts
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,634
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,640
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,641
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,675
Chuckle Brother 2 !ErY2TknG0w replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,677
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,680
@1,288,641 (G)
He said the girl he'd be with was a real-live girl. It was a real-life girlfriend, not some online girl.
He said the girl he'd be with was a real-live girl. It was a real-life girlfriend, not some online girl.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,688
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 50 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,697
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Please, just understand that even if you cut your dick off, you'll always be a male.
Please, just understand that even if you cut your dick off, you'll always be a male.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 24 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,704
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 37 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,706
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You're upset at the idea of kids being harmed and I don't think it's disgusting.
You're right I'm upset at the idea. You men wanting to be women encouraging male children to cut off their penis and be a woman is cruel. You should be ashamed of yourself.
> You're upset at the idea of kids being harmed and I don't think it's disgusting.
You're right I'm upset at the idea. You men wanting to be women encouraging male children to cut off their penis and be a woman is cruel. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 34 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,709
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 27 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,712
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm the pervert? Unlike you, I'm not going around telling little boys to cut off their penis and become a girl. It's wannabe women like you.
I'm the pervert? Unlike you, I'm not going around telling little boys to cut off their penis and become a girl. It's wannabe women like you.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,716
@OP
You'll have to describe that picture in words.
You'll have to describe that picture in words.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 32 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,725
@1,288,712 (C)
You randomly bring up raping kids and use disgusting, porny terms to do so
Why do you think about it that much?
Why do you mention kids genitalia so frequently?
You randomly bring up raping kids and use disgusting, porny terms to do so
Why do you think about it that much?
Why do you mention kids genitalia so frequently?
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 39 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,730
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,737
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 46 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,751
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,761
@1,288,730 (E)
I think Anon C would love it if Father Merrin were a child molester. Which is so weird
I think Anon C would love it if Father Merrin were a child molester. Which is so weird
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 1 year ago, 15 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,762
Anonymous E replied with this 1 year ago, 50 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,765
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 45 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,771
@previous (E)
Him randomly bringing up child molestation
(and using gross,porny terms to do it), and him making several replies referencing little boys genitalia. It's pretty obvious
Him randomly bringing up child molestation
(and using gross,porny terms to do it), and him making several replies referencing little boys genitalia. It's pretty obvious
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,772
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
How is him asking you why you want boys to cut off their junk, "porny"? There's nothing in his statements about child molestation.
How is him asking you why you want boys to cut off their junk, "porny"? There's nothing in his statements about child molestation.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 15 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,773
@previous (I)
Do you not know how to read or what? This is his first comment
1. @1,288,620 (C)
> >how many kids have you fucked
That's him bringing up child molestation unprovoked, and saying it in a disgustingly porny way
Then he types this
2. @1,288,706 (C)
> > You're upset at the idea of kids being harmed and I don't think it's disgusting.
>
> You're right I'm upset at the idea. You men wanting to be women encouraging male children to cut off their penis and be a woman is cruel. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Talking about little books penises
And this
3. @1,288,712 (C)
> I'm the pervert? Unlike you, I'm not going around telling little boys to cut off their penis and become a girl. It's wannabe women like you.
Talking about little boys penises
Do you not know how to read or what? This is his first comment
1. @1,288,620 (C)
> >how many kids have you fucked
That's him bringing up child molestation unprovoked, and saying it in a disgustingly porny way
Then he types this
2. @1,288,706 (C)
> > You're upset at the idea of kids being harmed and I don't think it's disgusting.
>
> You're right I'm upset at the idea. You men wanting to be women encouraging male children to cut off their penis and be a woman is cruel. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Talking about little books penises
And this
3. @1,288,712 (C)
> I'm the pervert? Unlike you, I'm not going around telling little boys to cut off their penis and become a girl. It's wannabe women like you.
Talking about little boys penises
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 16 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,774
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Do you not know how to read or what? This is his first comment
> 1. @1,288,620 (C)
> > >how many kids have you fucked
> That's him bringing up child molestation unprovoked, and saying it in a disgustingly porny way
Asking a "so called priest how many kids he's molested, is not "porny".
> Then he types this
> 2. @1,288,706 (C)
> > > You're upset at the idea of kids being harmed and I don't think it's disgusting.
> > You're right I'm upset at the idea. You men wanting to be women encouraging male children to cut off their penis and be a woman is cruel. You should be ashamed of yourself.
> Talking about little books penises
Talking about you wanting or being ok with castration on young "books", is hardly "porny". And I agree with him, you are disgusting for being ok with that.
> And this
> 3. @1,288,712 (C)
> > I'm the pervert? Unlike you, I'm not going around telling little boys to cut off their penis and become a girl. It's wannabe women like you.
> Talking about little boys penises
Talking about you wanting or being ok with castration on young boys, is hardly "porny".
Maybe you should quit playing dressing up like a woman, and go outside and touch grass.
> Do you not know how to read or what? This is his first comment
> 1. @1,288,620 (C)
> > >how many kids have you fucked
> That's him bringing up child molestation unprovoked, and saying it in a disgustingly porny way
Asking a "so called priest how many kids he's molested, is not "porny".
> Then he types this
> 2. @1,288,706 (C)
> > > You're upset at the idea of kids being harmed and I don't think it's disgusting.
> > You're right I'm upset at the idea. You men wanting to be women encouraging male children to cut off their penis and be a woman is cruel. You should be ashamed of yourself.
> Talking about little books penises
Talking about you wanting or being ok with castration on young "books", is hardly "porny". And I agree with him, you are disgusting for being ok with that.
> And this
> 3. @1,288,712 (C)
> > I'm the pervert? Unlike you, I'm not going around telling little boys to cut off their penis and become a girl. It's wannabe women like you.
> Talking about little boys penises
Talking about you wanting or being ok with castration on young boys, is hardly "porny".
Maybe you should quit playing dressing up like a woman, and go outside and touch grass.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,775
@previous (I)
The way they said it was porny and now I know you're a pervert too
Acting like I want young children to be castrated as an excuse to talk about little kids penises is perverted and you're a pervert for defending it
The way they said it was porny and now I know you're a pervert too
Acting like I want young children to be castrated as an excuse to talk about little kids penises is perverted and you're a pervert for defending it
Toilet Seat !ErY2TknG0w replied with this 1 year ago, 11 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,776
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
But yet, you keep responding and talking about it. Are you Dave's apprentice?
But yet, you keep responding and talking about it. Are you Dave's apprentice?