Topic: If you believe that "computers" are capable of true computation, then you are sorely mistaken.
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 year ago #116,598
These devices, with their discrete functions and physical limitations, simply cannot compare to the intricacies of the human brain. How does the process of mathematics travel from one end of a machine to another? It's not as if the answer magically floats through the air. Instead, it relies on simple switches flipping on and off, an inadequate imitation of true mathematical thought.Rather than placing your faith in mechanical contraptions, it is essential to recognize the inherent superiority of human computation. The delicate nuances and complexities involved in mathematical processes are simply beyond the capabilities of machines. To suggest otherwise is to ignore the fundamental principles of quantum physics, which govern the intricate workings of our minds.
Only through the ingenuity and intellect of human mathematicians can true mathematical thought be achieved. Let us not be deceived by the allure of artificial computation, but instead, celebrate the enduring power of human intellect.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,287,052
didnt read/dont care
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,053
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,058
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 30 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,082
Chat GPT
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,084
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 52 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,085
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 39 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,094
Anonymous C replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,103
@previous (boof)
Do you think if we connected enough squirrels, they could create a kind of "super-squirrel intelligence"
Do you think if we connected enough squirrels, they could create a kind of "super-squirrel intelligence"
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,107
@previous (C)With enough connected, it would display emergent behavior that matched human intelligence.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,113
@previous (A)
You have more bacterial cells in your intestines than you have in your body. We should really be talking about the collective bacterial intelligence of the earth, which far outnumbers all other lifeforms combined.
You have more bacterial cells in your intestines than you have in your body. We should really be talking about the collective bacterial intelligence of the earth, which far outnumbers all other lifeforms combined.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,116
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,121
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,123
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,125
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,127
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 8 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,193
@1,287,125 (B)
@previous (A)
The important thing to take away from this discussion is that for $1000 we can buy 1.2 digital mouse brains
@previous (A)
The important thing to take away from this discussion is that for $1000 we can buy 1.2 digital mouse brains
(Edited 1 minute later.)